FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Ratio..
Ratio..
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Some people don't judge people by their photos or first message. Some people seek more than superficial. Luckily this site is full of people to pick and choose individual compatibilities." Or people who give false compliments to get a fuck  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky." Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Some people don't judge people by their photos or first message. Some people seek more than superficial. Luckily this site is full of people to pick and choose individual compatibilities. Or people who give false compliments to get a fuck "Some of us are articulate enough to communicate beyond compliments. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky. Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x" Would you like to write what I put...you praised my cock.. i replied with a gentle compliment and a no thank you. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky. Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x"  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky. Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky. Just tested this theory. It took all of 10 seconds for you to reply hun x" Think your taxi has arrived Op!  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I said no thanks folks " But you rarely reply to a first message is what you claimed. Not that you rarely reply in a positive way to a first message. Ergo, I don’t care if you said no, you replied to a first message. You should be clearer if you are going to make statements. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"It really hasn’t I said no thanks. This fantasist fancies making me look bad haha. Can you screenshot on here and post? " No, private messages are not even supposed to be discussed on the forums. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I said no thanks folks "  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You replied to us too... not in a good way but you replied. To say you rarely ever reply to first messages. You’re two for two kiddo" I said no thanks not my type haha | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I judge by attitude and attributes, no point in having the body, face or knob if there isn't a lot going on between the ears with the lights on but no one's home Give me substance over superficial anyday" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 mind blown lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"You replied to us too... not in a good way but you replied. To say you rarely ever reply to first messages. You’re two for two kiddo I said no thanks not my type haha" You're not really helping yourself here lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol"You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha R | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol
You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha
R"We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it. In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"What’s your ratio on here? 1 in how many you would speak to? I must message 1 in every 1000 profiles I look at. I rarely reply to a first message as I need my woman to be in tight shape (just a preference - don’t lose your shit haha) I have very standards and I am a lot of things put me off. I feel some men don’t care about this and have a scattergun approach regardless of looks / profile content - must be close t 100% of profiles they look at the message - yucky." Oh god to actually speak to them... I only regularly speak to 2 people on here, not through choice tho. So can’t even put a number on it. I’d happily talk to more and not even in a meet for sex capacity. I just think women receive a lot of attention so can be selective with who new they let in. So I’d talk to a lot, but don’t get too, forums can be good for that tho. I’ve spoke with people on here that I can’t DM because I’m under the age limit etc lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol
You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha
R
We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it.
In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out."If the OP didn't bang on about himself and his cock all the time, while calling everyone else a soft cock, he might have had a gentler response. I doubt that he's particularly bothered by negative posts, are you mate? All publicity... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol
You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha
R
We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it.
In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out."Yeah I think his wording got hackles up and not his questions. And to answer the question. I have only sent messages to those I like the sound of on their profile. Pictures are here to show off our best sides so take them with a pinch of salt. So percentage I'd say about 10% of the profiles I've looked at. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think in terms of "ratios" or "hit rates" and any initial messages whether solicited or not aren't with a view to meeting, but getting to know someone to gauge if they are someone I'd like to meet, and they me of course. In fact I think the fastest I have gone from initial message to discussing meeting has been 3 or 4 weeks. In almost 5 years of this profile I have sent precisely six completely unsolicited cold messages to profiles I've had no interaction with on the forums. " Unsolicited ? You rascal | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol
You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha
R
We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it.
In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out."Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol
You think he's going to chat back and blow his theory out the water Haha
R
We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it.
In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out.
Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response. "Wooooa I’ve just learned you can do this haha! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"Wow this thread went on the attack very quick! We VERY rarely send a first message and even then it may not be that we want to meet the person but more to compliment something we see or to reply to an update status that we find amusing. Regarding the Op being choosy about who he messages and wants to meet, that’s his choice, a bit like not everyone uses Facebook the same way we all get what we need/want from the platforms we use. The only thing I find absolutely shocking is He said ‘no’ to Bucks couple!!! mind blown lol"Every thread I create goes that way - guys are jealous of me haha. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
"I don't think in terms of "ratios" or "hit rates" and any initial messages whether solicited or not aren't with a view to meeting, but getting to know someone to gauge if they are someone I'd like to meet, and they me of course. In fact I think the fastest I have gone from initial message to discussing meeting has been 3 or 4 weeks. In almost 5 years of this profile I have sent precisely six completely unsolicited cold messages to profiles I've had no interaction with on the forums. Unsolicited ? You rascal "I know...the cheek of it  | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" We don’t need him to reply to our post, it’s a general response. Unlike others we aren’t trying to catch him out to ‘bring his attitude down a peg or 2’ which seems to be the goal for some ... don’t get it. In the forums men are always getting slagged off for just saying what they want to get a shag. Here is someone trying to say he wants a bit more to actually want to meet (certainly could have articulated in more gentle nature so some don’t get offended). We don’t feel his overall question has even been addressed yet as most are just wanting to catch him out." This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
" Maybe green arrow the Op and you’ll maybe understand why he’s got this response. " We don't need to look at other threads to answer a question on this thread. This is why there is mayhem on the forum at times because people just won't move on, it ends up looking like a pack mentality attacking one person | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |||
