FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > If you was to put a person on the sexual richter scale
If you was to put a person on the sexual richter scale
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"JennieTV is a 10 
Hang on. If 2 is stunning, what's 10?
Is the scale running backwards?
If so that makes sense.
Will need to Google Richter scale!
I'm confused  "
Me too.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ad NannaWoman
over a year ago
East London |
"JennieTV is a 10
Hang on. If 2 is stunning, what's 10?
Is the scale running backwards?
If so that makes sense.
Will need to Google Richter scale!
I'm confused
Me too.
"
2 is a mild earthquake and 8 is the worse. I think that would make you a 2 because you don't want a strong earthquake so 2 is good?
I think.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"JennieTV is a 10
Hang on. If 2 is stunning, what's 10?
Is the scale running backwards?
If so that makes sense.
Will need to Google Richter scale!
I'm confused
Me too.
2 is a mild earthquake and 8 is the worse. I think that would make you a 2 because you don't want a strong earthquake so 2 is good?
I think.
"
Thank you x
I think x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Just to make things slightly more confusing perhaps, I was involved in earthquake engineering at one point... so basically 4 on the Richter scale is 10 times bigger than a 3. Likewise, 5 is ten times bigger than a 4. So a 5 on the Richter scale is 100 times bigger than a 3 and so on..... this is why massive earthquakes (say 9 on the Richter scale) are so rare....
It’s too early - I know.... I’m sorry! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
