 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu 
How would you implement that?"
Not a clue...
It's impossible...such a shame. It might decrease some of the butthurt twat bags who can't take rejection in our inbox  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
Not a clue...
It's impossible...such a shame. It might decrease some of the butthurt twat bags who can't take rejection in our inbox "
Maybe there should be better use of filters to stop unsolicited messages? And better ways of communicating exactly what people want rather than the sender needing a degree of guess work if it’s not clear or contradictory info |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Longer videos
Is there a time limit? As a non-supporter I’m not able to see them
Yes, 1 minute max"
I didn’t realise that. Yes, longer videos would be good |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
Not a clue...
It's impossible...such a shame. It might decrease some of the butthurt twat bags who can't take rejection in our inbox
Maybe there should be better use of filters to stop unsolicited messages? And better ways of communicating exactly what people want rather than the sender needing a degree of guess work if it’s not clear or contradictory info"
The answer to this is always filters.
We're interested in some man, why prevent them all from messaging because SOME can't be arsed to read?
Our profile is perfectly clear and even if it weren't, we're allowed to simply not be interested.
My one change would be for people to read the profile before messaging. Unfortunately there's no way to in force that...our block list will continue to grow...   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
Not a clue...
It's impossible...such a shame. It might decrease some of the butthurt twat bags who can't take rejection in our inbox
Maybe there should be better use of filters to stop unsolicited messages? And better ways of communicating exactly what people want rather than the sender needing a degree of guess work if it’s not clear or contradictory info
The answer to this is always filters.
We're interested in some man, why prevent them all from messaging because SOME can't be arsed to read?
Our profile is perfectly clear and even if it weren't, we're allowed to simply not be interested.
My one change would be for people to read the profile before messaging. Unfortunately there's no way to in force that...our block list will continue to grow... "
I feel your pain. Mine is growing too |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?"
There could be a test about the person before you message them 
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
There could be a test about the person before you message them
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start "
Ooh brutal xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
There could be a test about the person before you message them
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start
Ooh brutal xx"
Because it is so selfish of them! Just looking at updates for about 10 minutes yesterday I reported and blocked about 20 people... and they'll be back soon still trying to meet |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
There could be a test about the person before you message them
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start "
Yes!!!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
Not a clue...
It's impossible...such a shame. It might decrease some of the butthurt twat bags who can't take rejection in our inbox "
agree with you there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
There could be a test about the person before you message them
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start
Ooh brutal xx
Because it is so selfish of them! Just looking at updates for about 10 minutes yesterday I reported and blocked about 20 people... and they'll be back soon still trying to meet"
The filter to stop meets clearly isn’t working then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
How would you implement that?
There could be a test about the person before you message them
I'd like to see anybody trying to meet now punished. Their computer to explode and a horrible STD for a start
Ooh brutal xx
Because it is so selfish of them! Just looking at updates for about 10 minutes yesterday I reported and blocked about 20 people... and they'll be back soon still trying to meet
The filter to stop meets clearly isn’t working then"
Definitely doesn't stop some |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"My one thing would have to be that all users were verified by the site to use the site
But still free-to-use?"
Might be but more importantly it cuts out the fake accounts which spoil the site and additional work needed for clearing this mess plus better control site would have and more to enjoy about this lovely site because it only takes a few that can make a huge difference which can be putting off even for a new users |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Individual filters for each sex
So I can filter out all the fab straight guys and only have bi guys contact me
But still allowing for straight and bi woman to contact me
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Not being able to change date of birth, surely everyone knows theirs & only change it to get around filters.
Being able to rearrange photos in different orders without having to reupload them (that way keeping the original date of first posting).
Have a filter for location.
Filter for both of the couple being in the age range you're looking for.
Not being able to message if photos are in friends or private & not hide them until message sent is read, again so not to get around filters. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"My one thing would have to be that all users were verified by the site to use the site
But still free-to-use?
Might be but more importantly it cuts out the fake accounts which spoil the site and additional work needed for clearing this mess plus better control site would have and more to enjoy about this lovely site because it only takes a few that can make a huge difference which can be putting off even for a new users"
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Individual filters for each sex
So I can filter out all the fab straight guys and only have bi guys contact me
But still allowing for straight and bi woman to contact me
"
That should be easy to implement provided people don’t chop and change their sexuality to suit themselves and change like the wind like some lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I would like the facility to be online but not show as online, and the ability to turn off friends requests being sent."
Another simple but effective one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not being able to change date of birth, surely everyone knows theirs & only change it to get around filters.
Being able to rearrange photos in different orders without having to reupload them (that way keeping the original date of first posting).
Have a filter for location.
Filter for both of the couple being in the age range you're looking for.
Not being able to message if photos are in friends or private & not hide them until message sent is read, again so not to get around filters."
Couples confuse things so much lol (especially speaking as a guy) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not being able to change date of birth, surely everyone knows theirs & only change it to get around filters.
Being able to rearrange photos in different orders without having to reupload them (that way keeping the original date of first posting).
Have a filter for location.
Filter for both of the couple being in the age range you're looking for.
Not being able to message if photos are in friends or private & not hide them until message sent is read, again so not to get around filters."
This plus being able to switch off friend requests
Body type filters too some like bigger women some dont for example. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not being able to change date of birth, surely everyone knows theirs & only change it to get around filters.
Being able to rearrange photos in different orders without having to reupload them (that way keeping the original date of first posting).
Have a filter for location.
Filter for both of the couple being in the age range you're looking for.
Not being able to message if photos are in friends or private & not hide them until message sent is read, again so not to get around filters.
This plus being able to switch off friend requests
Body type filters too some like bigger women some dont for example. "
Preferences seems to be a big theme here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Individual filters for each sex
So I can filter out all the fab straight guys and only have bi guys contact me
But still allowing for straight and bi woman to contact me
That should be easy to implement provided people don’t chop and change their sexuality to suit themselves and change like the wind like some lol "
Good god tell me about it they try that one all ready I get a kick out off it when they contact me and I look at they profile and thay then change it like it’s going to make a difference should have had it set to that before messageing in the first place lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea! "
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Individual filters for each sex
So I can filter out all the fab straight guys and only have bi guys contact me
But still allowing for straight and bi woman to contact me
That should be easy to implement provided people don’t chop and change their sexuality to suit themselves and change like the wind like some lol
Good god tell me about it they try that one all ready I get a kick out off it when they contact me and I look at they profile and thay then change it like it’s going to make a difference should have had it set to that before messageing in the first place lol "
This! Bi couples are amongst the worst for chopping and changing their preferences depending who messages them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
A pre message from fab where if someone contacts you from a forum thread you can choose wether to engage or not. Some forum threads get very nasty and people send abuse privately so a message saying ‘x wants to reply privately to you from x forum thread’ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The ability to filter out messages based on sexuality and likes x
I know people Would just get round it though by changing theirs, but it’s just the same with the amount of single guys that set up fake women’s / couples profiles x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"A pre message from fab where if someone contacts you from a forum thread you can choose wether to engage or not. Some forum threads get very nasty and people send abuse privately so a message saying ‘x wants to reply privately to you from x forum thread’ "
Good one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start."
What if people don’t want to display face pics for anonymity purposes? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The ability to filter out messages based on sexuality and likes x
I know people Would just get round it though by changing theirs, but it’s just the same with the amount of single guys that set up fake women’s / couples profiles x"
This is definitely a common theme |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'd limit the number of messages allowed to new people. That way guys would read profiles carefully before messaging and be more likely to check to see if they're well matched, women would get fewer and be flattered when we get them, so they'd actually get read and probably replied to.
It would feel less harassing, and men would get far more replies. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Have some sort of auto reply one click reply so messages get replies for e.g sorry not interested or no thanks. Would stop the ignoring and blocking."
This |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start.
I'll vote for those"
What do you suggest for people who don’t want to display a face pic? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start.
I'll vote for those"
Or if a new member joins they need to be photo verified within 24 hours or get removed and any profile not photo verified same applies to them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start.
I'll vote for those
What do you suggest for people who don’t want to display a face pic? "
Photo verification stays hidden and you can still hide your face and if one asks for a face pic send from private |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start.
I'll vote for those
What do you suggest for people who don’t want to display a face pic?
Photo verification stays hidden and you can still hide your face and if one asks for a face pic send from private "
That’s the case now isn’t it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Wider range of filters... height, orientation, min max, lots of stuff like that.
Local updates to more closely match your own profile.
Everyone to be photo verified.
Messages to those on friends list to get priority in your inbox. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Wider range of filters... height, orientation, min max, lots of stuff like that.
Local updates to more closely match your own profile.
Everyone to be photo verified.
Messages to those on friends list to get priority in your inbox."
Some good ones there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea!
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it?"
Not sure about how much (programming) would be involved or if there is an appetite for it but... we are already doing our own selection by asking readers to put a particular word in their message to ensure they have read the message.
I know some get round this by scanning the bottom lines of the profile but it does offer some filtering.
In short, I would love to see that as so many people just don't bother reading profiles. I am at a point where I no longer reply to people who clearly have not read any of mine.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea!
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it?
Not sure about how much (programming) would be involved or if there is an appetite for it but... we are already doing our own selection by asking readers to put a particular word in their message to ensure they have read the message.
I know some get round this by scanning the bottom lines of the profile but it does offer some filtering.
In short, I would love to see that as so many people just don't bother reading profiles. I am at a point where I no longer reply to people who clearly have not read any of mine.
"
Do you think a password for private messaging could be introduced somehow? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *phroditeWoman
over a year ago
(She/ her) in Sensualityland |
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea!
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it?
Not sure about how much (programming) would be involved or if there is an appetite for it but... we are already doing our own selection by asking readers to put a particular word in their message to ensure they have read the message.
I know some get round this by scanning the bottom lines of the profile but it does offer some filtering.
In short, I would love to see that as so many people just don't bother reading profiles. I am at a point where I no longer reply to people who clearly have not read any of mine.
Do you think a password for private messaging could be introduced somehow? "
How would you suggest this could work? Pictures (some) available and then? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea!
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it?
Not sure about how much (programming) would be involved or if there is an appetite for it but... we are already doing our own selection by asking readers to put a particular word in their message to ensure they have read the message.
I know some get round this by scanning the bottom lines of the profile but it does offer some filtering.
In short, I would love to see that as so many people just don't bother reading profiles. I am at a point where I no longer reply to people who clearly have not read any of mine.
Do you think a password for private messaging could be introduced somehow? "
Why would you want a password introduced for messaging? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"All to be photo verified no sillouette and ban fake account through ip line be a good start.
I'll vote for those
Or if a new member joins they need to be photo verified within 24 hours or get removed and any profile not photo verified same applies to them"
This. Will get rid of the fakes and single guys posing as cpls |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Fab’s pretty basic in most of its functions, and that’s just how I like it.
You don’t use shit loads of data , or need the latest phone and it still functions with minimal signal.
I can find my way round most of it and I’m pretty IT illiterate so it suits me fine the way it is.
If you made the site more complex I think you’d loose that ease of use and they’d probably charge you more for the privaledge. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A pre message from fab where if someone contacts you from a forum thread you can choose wether to engage or not. Some forum threads get very nasty and people send abuse privately so a message saying ‘x wants to reply privately to you from x forum thread’ "
And this ^ please |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd make it impossible to message someone without reading their profile in full.
Lu
Great idea!
Do you have any suggestions about how to implement it?
Not sure about how much (programming) would be involved or if there is an appetite for it but... we are already doing our own selection by asking readers to put a particular word in their message to ensure they have read the message.
I know some get round this by scanning the bottom lines of the profile but it does offer some filtering.
In short, I would love to see that as so many people just don't bother reading profiles. I am at a point where I no longer reply to people who clearly have not read any of mine.
Do you think a password for private messaging could be introduced somehow?
Why would you want a password introduced for messaging? "
Where you would need to be given someone’s password before you’re able to message them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Simply being able to hide your online status.
So being able to log on and have no one know.
It's not a problem with our couples profile but Mrs gets messages almost instantly when she logs on her hotwife profile.
If this was optional I'm pretty sure that alot of women would use this feature. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If a single man hadn't had a verified meet within 12 months a random local single lady, who matches all his preferences, is selected for a supervised social meet! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If a single man hadn't had a verified meet within 12 months a random local single lady, who matches all his preferences, is selected for a supervised social meet! "
Jeeze that sounds a bit Victorian.
Would said single man be wheeled round on a sack barrow in a mask Hannibal lector style? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If a single man hadn't had a verified meet within 12 months a random local single lady, who matches all his preferences, is selected for a supervised social meet!
Jeeze that sounds a bit Victorian.
Would said single man be wheeled round on a sack barrow in a mask Hannibal lector style?"
Why not, that's how us single blokes are viewed on here anyway!
PS, unless you've worked it out, it was a tongue in cheek joke! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Individual filters for each sex
So I can filter out all the fab straight guys and only have bi guys contact me
But still allowing for straight and bi woman to contact me
That should be easy to implement provided people don’t chop and change their sexuality to suit themselves and change like the wind like some lol
Good god tell me about it they try that one all ready I get a kick out off it when they contact me and I look at they profile and thay then change it like it’s going to make a difference should have had it set to that before messageing in the first place lol
This! Bi couples are amongst the worst for chopping and changing their preferences depending who messages them "
Not all cpls. We blocked all single guys from the start. We might one day change our minds about meeting them in the future. But to many stroppy guys and ones who wont take no for an answer put us off bigtime. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Simply being able to hide your online status.
So being able to log on and have no one know.
It's not a problem with our couples profile but Mrs gets messages almost instantly when she logs on her hotwife profile.
If this was optional I'm pretty sure that alot of women would use this feature."
Very good idea. Simular to incognito mode for your browser. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
For the first three months after signing up, you must read rules and profiles.
You must sit a test at the beginning of the fourth month and need a seventy five per cent result in order to message someone.
You must then keep up an attentive conversation for another three months before being allowed to speak on the phone
Then a further three months before meeting in a coffee bar
Then a further three meets before seeing a booby ........ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I would only allow people one week before they had to become a site supporter to stay on. I know they could delete and rejoin but we all know both this site and fabguys are plagued by timewasting idiots who suddenly disappear without trace at no cost to themselves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Green arrow links to forum postings on the profile.
And a magic summons button allowing you to portal someone immediately into your bed. "
I’m up for that second one We all need that button  xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Adding additional filters.
Make it easier for bi males and straight only guys to find what they are looking for.
Ie straight only seeking like minded couples. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Green arrow links to forum postings on the profile.
And a magic summons button allowing you to portal someone immediately into your bed. "
First one is an excellent idea. I’d also like to see a ban on duplicate profiles by the same person - one profile only! Too many duplicitous profiles here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
