FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Chivalry
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m very chivalrous and a bit of a Kind and Gentle Soul. Most women have been very pleasant and said thank you and gave me a big Smile. I’ve only had one or two remarks from Women who I’ve held the door open for, or when let them through first. I’ve hear things along the lines of : ‘Get Lost’ ‘I can open my own door thank you very much’ This won’t stop me from carrying on being chivalrous though, because those few were ‘the Bad Eggs’." my daughter wouldnt say it out loud but she does think the " I can open my own door" she says it's as bad as wolf whistles I have tried to argue the plus sides but accept she thinks differently. Thankfully she now doesnt see it as creepy just a different way of being | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own." I'm inclined to agree with this. I appreciate why other people like it but it doesn't float my boat. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be honest, I’ll hold the door open and even run to help someone open the door if I see them carrying something heavy, or have their hands full, regardless of their Sex, Race, etc" I appreciate this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own." Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too." What's the difference between chivalry and respect? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't think chivalry is dead, and it's something I practice often, but as others have said, it's not a deed, but a mindset and really it's just being poilte. But OP, I can kind of see where your daughter is coming from. In an age where gender equality is a cause of the times, how did you explain to your daughter that a man holding a door open, when she is more than capable herself is acceptable. Do we live in a time where we should stop using the word chivalrous and instead refer back to it as common manners and politeness, where men and women can hold the door or carry the shopping for one another. BTW, for anyone reading, I hold doors, and carry shopping, I'm a chivalrous guy. But I am also the dad of two daughters living in a world that is very gender inbalanced. How can we tell our daughters they can do anything, but that it's ok to let guys hold doors for them? is that not an oxymoron? It's an interesting topic OP and I would love to see what others think." I hold doors and offer seats based on need (and sometimes older/elderly men get really upset with me!). I'm very much about respect and manners - I think "chivalry" has too much baggage. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too." Agree with that. And I think it's lovely, respect, kindness, chivalry there can never be enough of it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect?" Chivalry and Respect are the same thing to me x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do we live in a time where we should stop using the word chivalrous and instead refer back to it as common manners and politeness, where men and women can hold the door or carry the shopping for one another. BTW, for anyone reading, I hold doors, and carry shopping, I'm a chivalrous guy. But I am also the dad of two daughters living in a world that is very gender inbalanced. How can we tell our daughters they can do anything, but that it's ok to let guys hold doors for them? is that not an oxymoron? It's an interesting topic OP and I would love to see what others think." I think to do away with the term is the thin edge of the wedge. To not challenge kids viewpoints (challenge being explain, question) on such things gradually erodes things like good manners, politeness etc. Small things I know, but small things grow bigger and eventually you're living in a society that is on the whole self centered, wanting to know what's in it for them before they'll do things. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can see why some see it as outdated as men’s and women are now seen as more equal than ever (though still progress to be made in many ways). I love it, though not to the extemes- I dated a guy who would literally jump out of the car and race around to open my door, it pissed me off. Holding doors, carrying heavier items, offering a coat etc. I don’t NEED them, but if it’s done in a genuine way then I appreciate it and it speaks volumes about their personality IMO." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It kinda irks me when holding a door open is used as an example. " yes, it's not a great example, but the most easily accessible to all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect?" My definition is that that chivalry recognises the fundamental differences between genders, whereas respect sometimes equalizes without regard. Both are good. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? My definition is that that chivalry recognises the fundamental differences between genders, whereas respect sometimes equalizes without regard. Both are good." If we use that definition then I find chivalry offensive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its nice as long as women don't think their entitled to it and men don't feel like they have to do it. Works both ways, men deserved to be looked after too " I loved ironing his shirt and then watching him put it on as we got ready to go out.... phwoar | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? My definition is that that chivalry recognises the fundamental differences between genders, whereas respect sometimes equalizes without regard. Both are good. If we use that definition then I find chivalry offensive." How very modern of you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? My definition is that that chivalry recognises the fundamental differences between genders, whereas respect sometimes equalizes without regard. Both are good. If we use that definition then I find chivalry offensive. How very modern of you." Nah. I'm postmodern and deconstructing the paradigm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its nice as long as women don't think their entitled to it and men don't feel like they have to do it. Works both ways, men deserved to be looked after too I loved ironing his shirt and then watching him put it on as we got ready to go out.... phwoar " yes I like things like this too and more recently. I really enjoyed making sure his dinner was cooked and ready for when he got home from a rather hard shift.. then flashed him a stocking top. He had never experienced that apparently..and it made me think mmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From my experience and observation, women who most have issues with these gestures of common decency are feminists who see the "patriarchy" around every corner. " Kyriarchy. Do keep up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From my experience and observation, women who most have issues with these gestures of common decency are feminists who see the "patriarchy" around every corner. Kyriarchy. Do keep up." Apologies. I'm not woke enough | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From my experience and observation, women who most have issues with these gestures of common decency are feminists who see the "patriarchy" around every corner. Kyriarchy. Do keep up. Apologies. I'm not woke enough " Well, evidently. It's only a 30-odd year old paradigm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From my experience and observation, women who most have issues with these gestures of common decency are feminists who see the "patriarchy" around every corner. Kyriarchy. Do keep up. Apologies. I'm not woke enough Well, evidently. It's only a 30-odd year old paradigm." Points to you for such profound knowledge | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own." Jesus wept | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think much of the difficulty is born out of the word itself, as it conjures up images of knights, maidens and dragons and Sir Walter Raleigh covering puddles with his cape. The word is heteronormative and implies the norm of heterosexual courtship and coupling. However the actions associated are good deeds and have no need to be gender specific. Our use of the word clings to outmoded assumptions about thoughtful and kind human behaviour and as such constrains our thinking. We need a world with more thoughtfulness, kindness and mutual caring." I do think that the word does it mo favours but then I'm enjoying having a man that Pampers me like a princess do perhaps I'm a tad biased lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think much of the difficulty is born out of the word itself, as it conjures up images of knights, maidens and dragons and Sir Walter Raleigh covering puddles with his cape. The word is heteronormative and implies the norm of heterosexual courtship and coupling. However the actions associated are good deeds and have no need to be gender specific. Our use of the word clings to outmoded assumptions about thoughtful and kind human behaviour and as such constrains our thinking. We need a world with more thoughtfulness, kindness and mutual caring." I emphatically agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think much of the difficulty is born out of the word itself, as it conjures up images of knights, maidens and dragons and Sir Walter Raleigh covering puddles with his cape. The word is heteronormative and implies the norm of heterosexual courtship and coupling. However the actions associated are good deeds and have no need to be gender specific. Our use of the word clings to outmoded assumptions about thoughtful and kind human behaviour and as such constrains our thinking. We need a world with more thoughtfulness, kindness and mutual caring. I do think that the word does it mo favours but then I'm enjoying having a man that Pampers me like a princess do perhaps I'm a tad biased lol" I enjoy being pampered too. It’s not a one way street | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think much of the difficulty is born out of the word itself, as it conjures up images of knights, maidens and dragons and Sir Walter Raleigh covering puddles with his cape. The word is heteronormative and implies the norm of heterosexual courtship and coupling. However the actions associated are good deeds and have no need to be gender specific. Our use of the word clings to outmoded assumptions about thoughtful and kind human behaviour and as such constrains our thinking. We need a world with more thoughtfulness, kindness and mutual caring. I do think that the word does it mo favours but then I'm enjoying having a man that Pampers me like a princess do perhaps I'm a tad biased lol I enjoy being pampered too. It’s not a one way street " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I enjoy being pampered too. It’s not a one way street " I think most of us do. Normally for me it has always been a one way thing from me to them though. So enjoying it both ways | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I enjoy being pampered too. It’s not a one way street I think most of us do. Normally for me it has always been a one way thing from me to them though. So enjoying it both ways " I’m all for mutual pampering | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect?" One is code of conduct the other one based on others feeling. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? One is code of conduct the other one based on others feeling. " I think blanket rules applied to all people is suboptimal. Why not base behaviour on perceived need and desire? Like I help guys carry heavy things, but back off if they get grouchy that a woman would help. It's not rocket surgery. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From my experience and observation, women who most have issues with these gestures of common decency are feminists who see the "patriarchy" around every corner. Kyriarchy. Do keep up. Apologies. I'm not woke enough Well, evidently. It's only a 30-odd year old paradigm. Points to you for such profound knowledge " To be fair Swing is knowledgeable in a lot of aspects and often offers great advice and perspectives about all sorts of things. its not unknown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? One is code of conduct the other one based on others feeling. I think blanket rules applied to all people is suboptimal. Why not base behaviour on perceived need and desire? Like I help guys carry heavy things, but back off if they get grouchy that a woman would help. It's not rocket surgery." Totally agreed, this is why we moved from chivalry to simple respect. The op used a old fashioned concept which upset her daughter because it’s based on the gender. A woman can’t be chivalry as it’s from the concept of chevalier, men knights. I am happy for you to carry my bags or opening a door for me anytime I won’t be grouchy about it... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. Chivalry is not just a man's domain, women are perfectly capable of being chivalrous too. What's the difference between chivalry and respect? One is code of conduct the other one based on others feeling. I think blanket rules applied to all people is suboptimal. Why not base behaviour on perceived need and desire? Like I help guys carry heavy things, but back off if they get grouchy that a woman would help. It's not rocket surgery. Totally agreed, this is why we moved from chivalry to simple respect. The op used a old fashioned concept which upset her daughter because it’s based on the gender. A woman can’t be chivalry as it’s from the concept of chevalier, men knights. I am happy for you to carry my bags or opening a door for me anytime I won’t be grouchy about it... " I'm absolutely with you. I'm all about respect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In essence, chivalry was a code of ethics and practice, of which good manners, courtesy, kindness, generosity and respect are paramount. A lot of which is still relevant today, and embraced by the modern gentlemen, of which I would consider myself. While it doesn’t have to be gender biased, it typically manifests itself in such ways to be seen as such. I can understand why this may upset the modern feminist, with whom I can sympathise, even if I don’t fully agree. While I celebrate and support the feminist ideal, at heart I’m also an incurable romantic. So yes, at times I am conflicted." Because you won’t open a car door to a man, ask to carry his bag if you see he’s struggling, open a door and let him pass you, all based on the assumption she’s weaker than you or not able to do it herself. I am not feminist but I first guess their answers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In essence, chivalry was a code of ethics and practice, of which good manners, courtesy, kindness, generosity and respect are paramount. A lot of which is still relevant today, and embraced by the modern gentlemen, of which I would consider myself. While it doesn’t have to be gender biased, it typically manifests itself in such ways to be seen as such. I can understand why this may upset the modern feminist, with whom I can sympathise, even if I don’t fully agree. While I celebrate and support the feminist ideal, at heart I’m also an incurable romantic. So yes, at times I am conflicted." I have a strong romantic streak, but maybe we need to be increasingly creative in how we display romanticism, rather than unawarely perpetuating archaic practices. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care." Such a noble sentiment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you need to adapt depending the woman and never presume all women want chivalry/gentleman. " Absolutely! And I can appreciate a kind intention (even if I still ask someone to stop if I think it's going to keep happening) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care." oxymoron, I left oxy just because I care | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care." 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you need to adapt depending the woman and never presume all women want chivalry/gentleman. Absolutely! And I can appreciate a kind intention (even if I still ask someone to stop if I think it's going to keep happening)" Thanks Also I do like how you do your courtesy-22/04 pic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective." So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think you need to adapt depending the woman and never presume all women want chivalry/gentleman. Absolutely! And I can appreciate a kind intention (even if I still ask someone to stop if I think it's going to keep happening) Thanks Also I do like how you do your courtesy-22/04 pic " Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I dislike it and find it outmoded. I (before anyone criticises me) am polite when people do those things, but if it's likely to repeat I'll ask them not to. I prefer respect and consideration, not on gendered grounds. But it's a matter of personal preference and to each their own. I'm inclined to agree with this. I appreciate why other people like it but it doesn't float my boat." I'm in this club too. I am fine with offering assistance, such as holding a door open, to any gender, but doing certain things just because I'm a woman? No, thank you. I have a different perspective too. Using a wheelchair out and about, a lot of people (of all genders) assume I need lots of help. Actually, I don't. The reason I have the chair is because it enables me to be independent. I can do all sorts of things in/from my chair. I certainly do not need anyone to put my trolley back or put bags in the car, etc. Even more than anything, do NOT touch my chair. Do not. Touching my chair and trying to push me where you think I should go is tantamount to assault in my eyes. You wouldn't seize someone on foot by the elbow and drag them around, so please don't push my chair. If I look like I'm struggling, I might be, but to date, there's been nowhere and nothing I've not managed to fathom out. I'd rather struggle and get there on my own, thank you (however odd that might sound). Mr KC has been openly criticised by random people in the street for standing aside and letting me struggle up a gravel path, for example. But that's what I want and he knows that. I got up in the end. We didn't need "advice" or people trying to touch me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In essence, chivalry was a code of ethics and practice, of which good manners, courtesy, kindness, generosity and respect are paramount. A lot of which is still relevant today, and embraced by the modern gentlemen, of which I would consider myself. While it doesn’t have to be gender biased, it typically manifests itself in such ways to be seen as such. I can understand why this may upset the modern feminist, with whom I can sympathise, even if I don’t fully agree. While I celebrate and support the feminist ideal, at heart I’m also an incurable romantic. So yes, at times I am conflicted. I have a strong romantic streak, but maybe we need to be increasingly creative in how we display romanticism, rather than unawarely perpetuating archaic practices." This, what YeOldWitchDoctor said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? " No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. " I’d call that being helpful, not chivalry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. " Yes, but the whole argument here - except for those who are equivocating - seems to be about gendered patterns of behaviour. Men doing it for women in particular ways. I hold doors when appropriate, help people lift things, etc. (And back off if asked to) I think everyone should if they can and they haven't been asked not to. On the basis of need, not gender | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Do you think it's an outdated notion...obviously not talking knights in shining armour etc. The holding doors open, offering a seat,a coat of your cold, carrying bags. My new partner is very chivalrous and it prompted a conversation with my teenager.. she said its insulting to women. Personally I find it lovely... He will often open the car door before I get in it. Always will grab the basket, bags to carry or gives me the lighter ones. Will open doors for me etc and when we were out and I was still cold offered me his coat ( I refused and I already had my coat and jumper ) When we were out he held a door open for a lady and she commented how lovely it was but then the next day a woman tutted.. ( to be fair he holds doors open for men too not just women) So is it outdated or still lovely " He sounds lovely. Sadly it is becoming a rarity. It's polite, it's good manners, it's treating your partner with respect and care. Not sure why anyone would make it seem offensive. There's enough in this world to be offended by without making being a gentleman one of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. Yes, but the whole argument here - except for those who are equivocating - seems to be about gendered patterns of behaviour. Men doing it for women in particular ways. I hold doors when appropriate, help people lift things, etc. (And back off if asked to) I think everyone should if they can and they haven't been asked not to. On the basis of need, not gender " Perhaps that's lost on me because I don't draw a distinction whether I am doing it for a man or a woman. If the discussion is about whether men do it for women because they are women or for some ulterior motive, then that's a whole other tiresome subject.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To be honest, I’ll hold the door open and even run to help someone open the door if I see them carrying something heavy, or have their hands full, regardless of their Sex, Race, etc" This / Freya | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. Yes, but the whole argument here - except for those who are equivocating - seems to be about gendered patterns of behaviour. Men doing it for women in particular ways. I hold doors when appropriate, help people lift things, etc. (And back off if asked to) I think everyone should if they can and they haven't been asked not to. On the basis of need, not gender Perhaps that's lost on me because I don't draw a distinction whether I am doing it for a man or a woman. If the discussion is about whether men do it for women because they are women or for some ulterior motive, then that's a whole other tiresome subject.." That's what's being hashed out here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can't help myself, and if someone finds it offensive I really don't care. 'manners maketh man', and it's not gender specific or selective. So you'll do something even if someone asks you not to? No, of course not, but I never ask a stranger beforehand, 'would you like me to hold this door for you or let it slam in your face?' Just last week at the tip I saw two men struggling to get a large mattress into a skip. The older guy dropped his end and I instinctively helped them with it. Manners are part of what makes us human. Yes, but the whole argument here - except for those who are equivocating - seems to be about gendered patterns of behaviour. Men doing it for women in particular ways. I hold doors when appropriate, help people lift things, etc. (And back off if asked to) I think everyone should if they can and they haven't been asked not to. On the basis of need, not gender Perhaps that's lost on me because I don't draw a distinction whether I am doing it for a man or a woman. If the discussion is about whether men do it for women because they are women or for some ulterior motive, then that's a whole other tiresome subject.. That's what's being hashed out here" Have fun with that one then. I'm out. It's ok, I can get the door myself.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Know it's perfectly ok that threads get repeated (and am absolutely not saying it's not ok) but my first instinct on seeing the OP was "not this hoary old chestnut again" because I knew immediately which issues would get raised and comments made. If the OP had posted a thread called "Common Decency And Respect For Others" in which she had championed the notion of holding doors open for people, and generally being "aware" of the potential needs of others, and showing small kindnesses to those others while out and about, then I suspect the thread may well have taken a somewhat different tangent. I also find it curious that those that espouse the "be kind" mantra often on threads, have difficulty with applying that same mantra when it comes to some of the random acts of kindness mentioned in the OP, that others do for others just because the thread subject is seen to be a "male thing" - because that is essentially what they are, people going out of their way to "be kind" by holding a door open, offering a seat etc Personally I will always offer to help others that appear to be in need, regardless of gender, sometimes the "offer" will be an assumptive action like holding a door open, others it will simply be an offer of help to be accepted or declined (hopefully with the some good grace with which it was made), and would certainly not force that offer on someone if they declined it. Whether you call that offer "chivalrous", "being a gentleman" or simply "doing what is right, decent, courteous and thoughtful" I really don't care, and shan't be changing the way I act either - frankly if someone has a problem with me acting like a decent human being then the problem is not mine." Well said, why can't we do things for others for kindness sakes and accept that for ourselves without question when it happens, not everyone has an agenda and it's so rude to not accept to tell them why you don't like it, crikey it is 2 seconds of your life and someone thought they were being nice I have a theory of 'pay it forward' I accept with grace the intention, with a view to passing it on to others | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically." Snap | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Know it's perfectly ok that threads get repeated (and am absolutely not saying it's not ok) but my first instinct on seeing the OP was "not this hoary old chestnut again" because I knew immediately which issues would get raised and comments made. If the OP had posted a thread called "Common Decency And Respect For Others" in which she had championed the notion of holding doors open for people, and generally being "aware" of the potential needs of others, and showing small kindnesses to those others while out and about, then I suspect the thread may well have taken a somewhat different tangent. I also find it curious that those that espouse the "be kind" mantra often on threads, have difficulty with applying that same mantra when it comes to some of the random acts of kindness mentioned in the OP, that others do for others just because the thread subject is seen to be a "male thing" - because that is essentially what they are, people going out of their way to "be kind" by holding a door open, offering a seat etc Personally I will always offer to help others that appear to be in need, regardless of gender, sometimes the "offer" will be an assumptive action like holding a door open, others it will simply be an offer of help to be accepted or declined (hopefully with the some good grace with which it was made), and would certainly not force that offer on someone if they declined it. Whether you call that offer "chivalrous", "being a gentleman" or simply "doing what is right, decent, courteous and thoughtful" I really don't care, and shan't be changing the way I act either - frankly if someone has a problem with me acting like a decent human being then the problem is not mine." I think the important distinction to make which, in a way you have done in this, is the difference in being helpful based on perceived needs or making gestures based on gender. Chivalry is an outmoded concept based on a different set of assumptions to being courteous and thoughtful. Language is important because it conveys meaning, allowing us to distinguish between subtle differences and that can reduce misunderstanding. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically." Fuck yes. And if you're a woman and you dig it, rock on. You do you. I don't like it and I'll ask anyone to stop if I think it's likely to happen again. (The only person I've ever been rude to about it, ever, is my FWB, but we're forever ripping into each other, it's fun banter) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically." I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically. I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. " I don't know the answer to the first question: If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Only you do. The point being that if I'm out and about and a chap holds a door open, that's fine. I don't question his motives. If he makes a point of saying something along gender lines (which happens), then that's how I know he's doing it out of some sort of sense of chivalry. Basically, if you held the door open for me but let it shut on the guy behind me, I'd have an issue. I'm not a bra burning feminist, but I am a very independent woman who has been brought up to know I can look after myself and do everything anyone else can do. The "do everything anyone else can do" got a bit kiboshed 4 years ago, so actually for me personally, I really value doing seemingly trivial things for myself. I can't run, skip, jump, climb mountains, so I want to keep a tight hold of what I CAN do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically. I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. I don't know the answer to the first question: If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Only you do. The point being that if I'm out and about and a chap holds a door open, that's fine. I don't question his motives. If he makes a point of saying something along gender lines (which happens), then that's how I know he's doing it out of some sort of sense of chivalry. Basically, if you held the door open for me but let it shut on the guy behind me, I'd have an issue. I'm not a bra burning feminist, but I am a very independent woman who has been brought up to know I can look after myself and do everything anyone else can do. The "do everything anyone else can do" got a bit kiboshed 4 years ago, so actually for me personally, I really value doing seemingly trivial things for myself. I can't run, skip, jump, climb mountains, so I want to keep a tight hold of what I CAN do." Holding the door open is often the one used in this argument as it can and is frequently done without being gender specific. However, opening a car door for a woman, giving up your seat to a woman on public transport, pulling back her seat in a restaurant and holding her coat while she puts it on, are more common chivalrous gestures and I think those are the ones, when there isn’t an obvious need, that are likely to be greeted with varying degrees of displeasure by women who hold feminist beliefs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically. I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. I don't know the answer to the first question: If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Only you do. The point being that if I'm out and about and a chap holds a door open, that's fine. I don't question his motives. If he makes a point of saying something along gender lines (which happens), then that's how I know he's doing it out of some sort of sense of chivalry. Basically, if you held the door open for me but let it shut on the guy behind me, I'd have an issue. I'm not a bra burning feminist, but I am a very independent woman who has been brought up to know I can look after myself and do everything anyone else can do. The "do everything anyone else can do" got a bit kiboshed 4 years ago, so actually for me personally, I really value doing seemingly trivial things for myself. I can't run, skip, jump, climb mountains, so I want to keep a tight hold of what I CAN do." And that was kind of my point - I've had comments, frowns and glares for the simple act of holding a door open for a lady or offering her my seat, no comment accompanying the offer, just simply either holding the door open or "Would you like to sit down?" - where the distinction has been made for me, that I am doing it for the wrong reasons. Perhaps if people just accepted that other people are perfectly capable of being nice without there having to be any hidden meaning it would all be so much easier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Holding the door open is often the one used in this argument as it can and is frequently done without being gender specific. However, opening a car door for a woman, giving up your seat to a woman on public transport, pulling back her seat in a restaurant and holding her coat while she puts it on, are more common chivalrous gestures and I think those are the ones, when there isn’t an obvious need, that are likely to be greeted with varying degrees of displeasure by women who hold feminist beliefs." Totally agree and I personally wouldn't expect any of those things to be done for me. It helps that I bring my own chair to restaurants though | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically. I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. I don't know the answer to the first question: If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Only you do. The point being that if I'm out and about and a chap holds a door open, that's fine. I don't question his motives. If he makes a point of saying something along gender lines (which happens), then that's how I know he's doing it out of some sort of sense of chivalry. Basically, if you held the door open for me but let it shut on the guy behind me, I'd have an issue. I'm not a bra burning feminist, but I am a very independent woman who has been brought up to know I can look after myself and do everything anyone else can do. The "do everything anyone else can do" got a bit kiboshed 4 years ago, so actually for me personally, I really value doing seemingly trivial things for myself. I can't run, skip, jump, climb mountains, so I want to keep a tight hold of what I CAN do. And that was kind of my point - I've had comments, frowns and glares for the simple act of holding a door open for a lady or offering her my seat, no comment accompanying the offer, just simply either holding the door open or "Would you like to sit down?" - where the distinction has been made for me, that I am doing it for the wrong reasons. Perhaps if people just accepted that other people are perfectly capable of being nice without there having to be any hidden meaning it would all be so much easier." Would you have offered me your seat? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" And that was kind of my point - I've had comments, frowns and glares for the simple act of holding a door open for a lady or offering her my seat, no comment accompanying the offer, just simply either holding the door open or "Would you like to sit down?" - where the distinction has been made for me, that I am doing it for the wrong reasons. Perhaps if people just accepted that other people are perfectly capable of being nice without there having to be any hidden meaning it would all be so much easier." With things like giving up seats on public transport, when I was a fully AB woman, I probably would have found it odd for a guy to offer his seat, because I had no specific need. I'd presume it was gender based and would probably just have politely declined and that's that. I used to offer my seat to older people who looked wobbly, anyone on crutches or with arms in casts etc, people with small children who couldn't safely stand or "babe in arms" type situation. My offer would be based on need, not gender. These days, it's not something I can do anymore (I'm not offering my wheelchair!) and I do get very pissed off when AB people occupy the disabled area of buses/trains and refuse to move. I've tipped over backwards on a bus before because I had to "sit" in the aisle. There's a reason the disabled area is designed as such | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm happy if people - men AND women - have manners. If I'm struggling to carry something/do something, I'd like to think someone would offer to help, much as I would. I'd feel embarrassed with car door opening/pulling my seat out in a restaurant. I wouldn't take it as an insult, as it's meant well and the gentleman obviously means respect, but after I got to know them, I'd suggest they not. I once had a partner who insisted on walking on the roadside of the pavement all the time, as his dad had told him to do that. That just used to piss me off, as we walked rather a lot & he was always swapping sides! " That's where I am too. I'd only be offended if they continued after I asked them to stop, or they did it in an overtly gendered (little lady, ladies first) sort of way. A gesture is a gesture, I'm always polite the first time, and I assume it's well intentioned (even if I say no) until I get pushback. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Guess it is a much bigger divider than I thought... " It is a divide because some people are so obsessed with ideology that they interpret decent and kind gestures that men might make towards a woman as either condescending or filled with an ulterior motive. Some gestures are clearly contrived and over the top but i'd assume they can be spotted easily and reprimanded. Far cry from lumping it all into outdated behaviour which is what *some* women do nowadays. Most i've met appreciate them when they come across as genuine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Guess it is a much bigger divider than I thought... It is a divide because some people are so obsessed with ideology that they interpret decent and kind gestures that men might make towards a woman as either condescending or filled with an ulterior motive. Some gestures are clearly contrived and over the top but i'd assume they can be spotted easily and reprimanded. Far cry from lumping it all into outdated behaviour which is what *some* women do nowadays. Most i've met appreciate them when they come across as genuine." Because some of us don't believe that the patriarchy are an evil organisation that's out to get us, and can understand that people often do things just to be courteous, or are simply behaving in the way that they have been raised to be with no ulterior motive or nefarious intentions | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age " My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman " And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him?" Well luckily both parents agreed so we didn't have to face it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. That’s so nice to see this you must be so proud of your son that’s impressive So proud to have raised a gentleman " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him?" Blessings are different to permission. I'd never ask her parents for permission. However their blessing yes. It is a sign of respect to the parents. If they don't give their bkesseng well tough shit to them because it is not their choice and they are the ones putting a downer on what their daughter wants. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age " my son has asked his gfs dad permission to marry her. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry I'm old fashioned and I was brought up to be polite and be a gentleman to ladies, good manners cost nothing! " Exactly we’ll said I couldn’t of put it better my self | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age my son has asked his gfs dad permission to marry her." I hope he said yes I haven’t had to ask I was in a long relationship but never got married and at my age now probably never will but it’s all good | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. That’s so nice to see this you must be so proud of your son that’s impressive So proud to have raised a gentleman " Thank you, he's pretty awesome | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him? Blessings are different to permission. I'd never ask her parents for permission. However their blessing yes. It is a sign of respect to the parents. If they don't give their bkesseng well tough shit to them because it is not their choice and they are the ones putting a downer on what their daughter wants. " That's it exactly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him? Well luckily both parents agreed so we didn't have to face it" That's good, but isn't always the case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Guess it is a much bigger divider than I thought... It is a divide because some people are so obsessed with ideology that they interpret decent and kind gestures that men might make towards a woman as either condescending or filled with an ulterior motive. Some gestures are clearly contrived and over the top but i'd assume they can be spotted easily and reprimanded. Far cry from lumping it all into outdated behaviour which is what *some* women do nowadays. Most i've met appreciate them when they come across as genuine. Because some of us don't believe that the patriarchy are an evil organisation that's out to get us, and can understand that people often do things just to be courteous, or are simply behaving in the way that they have been raised to be with no ulterior motive or nefarious intentions " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. That’s so nice to see this you must be so proud of your son that’s impressive So proud to have raised a gentleman Thank you, he's pretty awesome" Your welcome you did an amazing job of bringing your son up to be a gentleman not many around these days just a few of us left haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Also many years ago the man would ask the father of the daughter for his blessing to marry her you don’t see it in this day and age My son did this, his fiance's parents aren't together but he asked both Mum and Dad for their blessing. So proud to have raised a gentleman And if her parents said no, but she wanted to marry him? Blessings are different to permission. I'd never ask her parents for permission. However their blessing yes. It is a sign of respect to the parents. If they don't give their bkesseng well tough shit to them because it is not their choice and they are the ones putting a downer on what their daughter wants. " I'm glad that the "blessings" of parents wouldn't take precedence over what I'd presume would be a serious relationship between two adults (if one is seeking to get engaged etc). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think a lot of us are trying to make the distinction between "helping anyone, of any gender, because it seems appropriate" vs "making a point to treat women differently, just because they're women". I have zero issues with the former - I'm an excellent door-stop, for example. But I do have an issue with the latter. I don't want special treatment because I'm female, basically. I think the problem however comes down to who makes the distinction between the two - to use an example. If I hold a door open for a lady am I doing so because I "help anyone regardless of gender" or because it's a woman? Now I know that it's because I'd do it for anyone, yet the people that seem to have an issue with the notion of it are the ones likely to suggest I was doing so because it was a woman. " And you have an ulterior motive... Such a bastard chauvinist, how very dare you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today " Damn. Feminists really are destroying society | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today " How so? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Has this descended into the usual chaos yet. " It would seem? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Has this descended into the usual chaos yet. " Yes. I'm destroying society by having preferences again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today Damn. Feminists really are destroying society " A joke about someone losing their job? Nice | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today How so?" Yes, same question...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today " Good lord, how did that happen? I don't see how reading through an online forum in your own time can be anything to do with your employer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry I'm old fashioned and I was brought up to be polite and be a gentleman to ladies, good manners cost nothing! " Good manners are wonderful, PP. But I'd rather you showed me respect because I'm a human, not just because I'm female. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today " So. You know the time when a joke about being a doorman backfires....? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today So. You know the time when a joke about being a doorman backfires....? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today So. You know the time when a joke about being a doorman backfires....? " Men. Don't even have the basic chivalry to know what's appropriate and what's not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today So. You know the time when a joke about being a doorman backfires....? Men. Don't even have the basic chivalry to know what's appropriate and what's not." Probably funnier that the actual joke tbh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today So. You know the time when a joke about being a doorman backfires....? " You needed winky emoji's | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Has this descended into the usual chaos yet. " it has... who would have thought men behaving as gentleman would cause such uproar | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry I'm old fashioned and I was brought up to be polite and be a gentleman to ladies, good manners cost nothing! Good manners are wonderful, PP. But I'd rather you showed me respect because I'm a human, not just because I'm female. " Same. Preferences are grand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I got sacked because of this thread today Damn. Feminists really are destroying society A joke about someone losing their job? Nice " I recognised the joke. And I thought being nice was bad... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |