 |
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
yes he will and if I was him, I would forego my payoff and with a personal fortune of £100million he can afford to, then I would let rip at the government past and present, the FSA and the Bank of England.
all carry some accountability for another banking issue.
and then re_iew end to end where the actual issue sits and then sack them and possible criminal charge.
there will be divisional managing directors/directors all with their finger in this till.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
"There is a bit of me that thinks they ought to appoint him to carry out the full investigation, pro bono. The poacher turned gamekeeper knows all the old tricks, after all."
 very true |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Something just not right about politicians taking the moral high ground , do they honestly sit there thinking we have all forgotten about expenses shit.
It's like the sun having a go at someone for telling lies |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
"Something just not right about politicians taking the moral high ground , do they honestly sit there thinking we have all forgotten about expenses shit.
It's like the sun having a go at someone for telling lies "
I couldn't take the one with the hairpiece seriously... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not a very 'select' select committee... no answers and no clue on how to get answers. How could a Parliamentary Enquiry do any better?"
It won't.
Atendee's to Parliamentry select comittee's are not required to tell the truth and cannot be charged with purgury if they don't.
Formal Equiries are entirely diferent and the atendee's are sworn in, are examined by a Barister, before a judge and can be charged with purgery if they lie. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplits OP Woman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"Not a very 'select' select committee... no answers and no clue on how to get answers. How could a Parliamentary Enquiry do any better?It won't.
Atendee's to Parliamentry select comittee's are not required to tell the truth and cannot be charged with purgury if they don't.
Formal Equiries are entirely diferent and the atendee's are sworn in, are examined by a Barister, before a judge and can be charged with purgery if they lie."
Which is why the Government is pressing for a Parliamentary rather than Judicial Enquiry... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not a very 'select' select committee... no answers and no clue on how to get answers. How could a Parliamentary Enquiry do any better?It won't.
Atendee's to Parliamentry select comittee's are not required to tell the truth and cannot be charged with purgury if they don't.
Formal Equiries are entirely diferent and the atendee's are sworn in, are examined by a Barister, before a judge and can be charged with purgery if they lie.
Which is why the Government is pressing for a Parliamentary rather than Judicial Enquiry..."
Innit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think in this case it might be worth a Royal Comision to come up with proposals to properly regulate the Banking industry.
They take a hell of a long time to come back with results, but are very dificult to ignore when they return....... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
