FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Is it double standards when...
Is it double standards when...
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
What someone has on their profile and what they’re looking for on here can be different.
A man can have numerous dick pics and say he’s not interested in pussy pics.
It’s his choice  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "
I love your terminology haha.
But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?
Just pondering your thoughts  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.
I love your terminology haha.
But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?
Just pondering your thoughts "
Read it again beaut, I said the chuff ones aren't like that for the most part.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "
With that in mind, may I ask which language mine is speaking? Worth keeping or hiding away again? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.
I love your terminology haha.
But can you explain why a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo has more thought behind a spunk drizzled disembodied banjo?
Just pondering your thoughts
Read it again beaut, I said the chuff ones aren't like that for the most part. "
I read it again again actually and didn't really explain well 
I meant most fanjo photos aren't disembodied foofs, most are thought out as in...
On a made bed with clean sheets, maybe some flowers or other decorative items, or perhaps a nod to whatever kink they may have. The underwear even if not covering said chuff has been selected rather than whatever they threw on that morn.
Ya with me? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.
With that in mind, may I ask which language mine is speaking? Worth keeping or hiding away again?"
See yours, yours is one that I say, 'yes maaaate' THAT is how to take a pic containing a penis. You can see care has been taken, it has feeling and a 'moment attached to it, rather than a flop it out and snap |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No she is just observing her own filters. If you choose not to accept mail from ladies with pussy shots then that would in turn be your filter. I tend to have less initial filters so I can in turn learn more about the person than by making snap judgements. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"A females profile says anyone with dick pics as a profile pic that messages me will be blocked, when her profile pic is of her pussy? 
Hmmmm  "
Yes it is. It's not the only double standard either. But what ya gonna do? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No she is just observing her own filters. If you choose not to accept mail from ladies with pussy shots then that would in turn be your filter. I tend to have less initial filters so I can in turn learn more about the person than by making snap judgements. "
You mean to say you actually have women message you? Where did you learn this wizardry?!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A females profile says anyone with dick pics as a profile pic that messages me will be blocked, when her profile pic is of her pussy?
Hmmmm "
To be fair, I’ve never seen a profile say that and then they’ve had a close up of their quim as an avatar. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
I don't think it's double standards as such - people are entitled to have whatever they want associated with their profile whether that be what they display themselves, or what they ask not to be sent to them.
I think a lot of the time when ladies request no cock pics they do so because they've been sent so many and most of them "whip it out and snap a pic of it" close ups that really don't do a great deal for either recipient or sender.
It all kind of ties in with the volume of messages women get compared to men, and the number of men who think sending an unsolicited cock pic is ok, compared to the number of women who do the same in reverse.
I don't think "double standards" is the right phrase though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *oggoneMan
over a year ago
Derry |
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a . They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "
"spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo"
I read that in Nigella Lawson's voice.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a . They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages.
spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo
I read that in Nigella Lawson's voice.
"
Haha so did I now  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *edeWoman
over a year ago
the abyss |
"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....! "
That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!
That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that "
No no always swallow please |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *edeWoman
over a year ago
the abyss |
"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!
That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that
No no always swallow please "
Obviously |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well I’m not posting a dick pic mine looks like a slug wearing a bowler hat.....!
That imagery nearly had me spitting my tea out - but that would be wasteful so can't have that
No no always swallow please
Obviously "
Lol were you been all my life ??  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm gonna offer up my thoughts, of course I am, that's why I'm posting.
So... ish, perhaps, maybe depending on how you look at it.
There are of course exceptions to both, and many exceptions however...
Photo "standard" shall we call it. An awful lot if cock pics are just that. A cock. A fuck awful photo taken with zero care or thought that screams "look at my man meat, that's all ya need right?"
On the other hand (and remember, I have stated there are exceptions) an awful lot of poontang pics aren't just a spunk drizzled disembodied fanjo. They're thought out, the picture has been taken with care.
The two things, tho seemingly similar on the surface are speaking completely different languages. "
Absolutely spot on Peach |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I would say yes ... cock shots for me are a total no no but my photos aren’t explicit either it’s what I like - tease rather than sleaze (until I know you of course)
But at someone else said it’s all about context an artt photo in which someone happens to be nude is erotic ...... genitals in all their glory spread or erect over a toilet just all kinds on no. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
