 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards."
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message"
Get stuffed.none.
Fuck off.a few more.
A reply is still a reply. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message
Get stuffed.none.
Fuck off.a few more.
A reply is still a reply."
So if you went too a club or sociable event you burnt your Bridges..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message
Get stuffed.none.
Fuck off.a few more.
A reply is still a reply."
How does that prove that women prefer bastards?
Is your main aim to get responses? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message
Get stuffed.none.
Fuck off.a few more.
A reply is still a reply."
So what you are saying OP is you would rather have a reply telling you to "fuck off", than to have a message deleted and blocked which as per FAB "rules" means the other person just isn't interested?
Think that says more about you than it does about them.
If someone isn't interested I accept it and move on.
Hope your luck improves. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Posted something along those lines in two different thread over the last week
One was about the hi hows you messages
Saying no point in doing a personal message they just get read delete any way
Next was one on how woman prefer a gentleman
Witch I disagree with one’s agin because I am and don’t get anywhere mostly with woman
It’s simple facts that the massive have proven |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *isaB45Woman
over a year ago
Fabville |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards."
OP..
1. Read the site rules. No-one owes you a reply.
2. You might think that you meet their paremameters, but they obviously don't.
3. Site users can block who they want to, and do not have to justify themselves to you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards."
Your verifications all day you’re an arsehole, too! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Methodology is flawed how many told you to get stuffed when they replied from the negative message
Get stuffed.none.
Fuck off.a few more.
A reply is still a reply.
So what you are saying OP is you would rather have a reply telling you to "fuck off", than to have a message deleted and blocked which as per FAB "rules" means the other person just isn't interested?
Think that says more about you than it does about them.
If someone isn't interested I accept it and move on.
Hope your luck improves."
I reply Saying F off is better than spending 20 minutes reading a profile and then spending a nother 30-40 minutes typing out a personal witty message including things off they profile for it just to be binned truthfully |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So on week 1 I messaged 50 random women whose parameters I fitted.
Attached a face pic.
Was courteous and respectful.
Result.
37 instant deletes.
7 read no reply.
5 unread.
1 reply.
16 blocks.
Week 2.
I messaged 50 random women whose parameters i didnt fit with a picture of my cock to those who requested not to receive one.
Was abrasive and disrespectful.
37 replies.
11 read no reply
2 instant deletes.
5 blocks.
Conclusion.
Women prefer bastards.
Your verifications all day you’re an arsehole, too! "
You wouldn't have thought he'd have published those....
But a veri is a veri, I suppose  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
2 billion people on this planet may, on paper, match my parameters for interest. Even with my low standards, just a few thousand might be people I'd actually meet, with fewer that I'd actually shag.
Step 1 for happiness here, especially if you are a single man, is to set realistic expectations for yourself, understanding how things are here.
Did your ancestors, during the Spanish flu epidemic, have presumptions about shagging around as widely as they could? Perhaps their DNA passed down has influenced your beliefs about what people have made their priorities during this devastation today?
Assume most people that you think are perfect won't feel that mutually. Likewise, most people who you do chat with will not progress to become people who you meet and shag.
People have expertise in understanding what they want and have lots of choice to be able to get fulfilment.
Your challenge is to improve your skills in the identification of people who you like and who will share a mutual interest. If you are going to research anything here, that may be wiser use of your time and effort |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
