FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Trolling

Trolling

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place

One of the most important things the coalition is trying to do (for me personally )is to address the issue of trolling and updating the laws concerning online defamation to try to stop it.

Great idea and commendable they are at least trying ,but is it really possible and if so, what do you think the penalties should be for a convicted offenders. ?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

fingers chopped off

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iewMan  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Angus & Findhorn


"One of the most important things the coalition is trying to do (for me personally )is to address the issue of trolling and updating the laws concerning online defamation to try to stop it.

Great idea and commendable they are at least trying ,but is it really possible and if so, what do you think the penalties should be for a convicted offenders. ?"

if someone takes their life due to extreme trolling... manslaughter or something similar

otherwise fines and community service

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm not very familiar with the laws but the same as other sort of stalking or threats per phone, mail etc.

Great, that the UK is doing this. I hope Europe will follow!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *abioMan  over a year ago

Newcastle and Gateshead


"

if someone takes their life due to extreme trolling... manslaughter or something similar

otherwise fines and community service"

As well meaning as that may well be I am not sure if that would work.. You are going to have to define extreme trolling for a start...

If I was to say to _iew for example "fuck off and die!" and he was to commit suicide, would I be held responsible?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *iewMan  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Angus & Findhorn


"

if someone takes their life due to extreme trolling... manslaughter or something similar

otherwise fines and community service

As well meaning as that may well be I am not sure if that would work.. You are going to have to define extreme trolling for a start...

If I was to say to _iew for example "fuck off and die!" and he was to commit suicide, would I be held responsible?"

totally agree... very difficult to define but there needs to be different levels depending on degree of impact.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Though it's great that we're looking into doing this must remember the internet is a worldwide service so is something that needs to be done internationally.

With everything though there would have to be proof of substained trolling against an individual before they would take it to court.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *dwalu2Couple  over a year ago

Bristol


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on."

Of course it is. And also to distract people from real issues going on in the UK: health service privatised, disabled people victimised, young people ill educated and abandoned, etc, etc, etc.

Far easier to wield a big stick against some idiots on the internet and take people's mind off the way the country is being steadily wrecked.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rs Robinson1Woman  over a year ago

Chapel Row


"fingers chopped off "

or testicals removed with rusty scissors lol

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

Of course it is. And also to distract people from real issues going on in the UK: health service privatised, disabled people victimised, young people ill educated and abandoned, etc, etc, etc.

Far easier to wield a big stick against some idiots on the internet and take people's mind off the way the country is being steadily wrecked."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on."

If the general populace can't be trusted to use the internet properly then it has ot be regulated so that people can go online and not feel threatened. Extreme cases of trolling have ruined people's lives and spilled over into offline harassment.

All ISPs are required to keep data regarding which account is using a particular IP address at a given time and date and that info is matched to times and dates of offences committed. It's like leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a crime.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"One of the most important things the coalition is trying to do (for me personally )is to address the issue of trolling and updating the laws concerning online defamation to try to stop it.

Great idea and commendable they are at least trying ,but is it really possible and if so, what do you think the penalties should be for a convicted offenders. ?"

Call in Super (Bill) Goat Gruff.

Prevention is better than cure.

Sites need to be obliged by law to take responsiblity and stop trollers from posting.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *yrdwomanWoman  over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

Trouble is most forums and social networks are not run from the UK.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Gotta start somewhere?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *harax1985Man  over a year ago

Edlington

Ah yes, Trolling, the latest misused buzzword designed to provoke concerned faces and kneejerk reactions.

Trolling is "Being annoying on the internet", basically. That can range from just posting to start arguments all the way up to actual harassment and abuse.

Guess what? We have laws against harassment and abuse already, they're working just fine

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

There is a case or two going through the UK law system right now. We can wait and see what precedence it sets.

case 1

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2156031/Tory-MP-Louise-Menschs-Twitter-troll-Frank-Zimmerman-fails-turn-sentenced.html

case 2

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2156365/Nicola-Brookes-victim-internet-trolls-wins-High-Court-backing-reveal-identities-targeted-her.html

Banter and Micky taking is fine, part and parcel of life. The tolling, targeting someone and saying evil, libellous, lies, and following them around the web to continue the harassment is so wrong and should be similar to real world harassment, slander, stalking.

As a minimum they perpetrators should be outed.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I was wondering who would sensationalise this story only line today. On line bullys need stamping out and that often starts at home. If we all treat people right there would be no need for the defamation bill.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

will be good to see some of these trolls called up, named and shamed and punished for some of the stuff they post

ive read stuff at times that just leaves you gobsmacked. they have gotten away with it for too long

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Well theres a need for laws and i hope people will think twice about doing this to people. some over the years have even killed themselfs from nasty things on the net.. Thing is when you have it on the pc and keep it thay dont have a leg to stand on if your in the right .

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

If the general populace can't be trusted to use the internet properly then it has ot be regulated so that people can go online and not feel threatened. Extreme cases of trolling have ruined people's lives and spilled over into offline harassment.

All ISPs are required to keep data regarding which account is using a particular IP address at a given time and date and that info is matched to times and dates of offences committed. It's like leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a crime."

unfortunately its not that simple wishy ,if it were ,we would be regulated to death by now.

An ip number can be spun ,and or taken over by a third party to do evil deeds ,vpn's can be bought with no money trail ,encrypted onion skin servers can mask a trail no one can find.

Regarding the Trolling if its a group troll using zombie networks how can you ever identify the true perpetrator ,i just think its a great sentiment but unworkable tbh.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Trolling is a cowards way of insulting someone..lock them up

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

prison system is overcrowded as it is.

depending on what as posted i would impose a sentence based on that.

curfew,tagging and a ban on internet connection to the property of the offender would be reasonable.

if the offender moved address and did not inform the police then they go to prison.

also they would have to report to the police twice a week showing any recent utility bill to prove they are still at the address registered with the courts at time of sentencing.

placed on a register of companies who provide an internet service (mobile,fixed landline,cable etc) so there providers would be libel if found to be providing a service to the guilty party.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *urreyfun2008Man  over a year ago

East Grinstead

The best trolls actually do it by winding up people slowly, and the innocent flies off the handle.

While some cases are clearly extreme, most are no more than pubescent playground name calling and new laws could increase the workload for online forums.

Also the professional trolls already bounce off of VPN's and proxies to evade good site admins

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heWolfMan  over a year ago

warwickshire

Well, I like trolling, it's funny and entertaining, especially watching people who think they are clever get given the runaround, before being reeled in and clubbed by people who are infinitely cleverer. Pure comedy gold.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ezebelWoman  over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest


"Trolling is a cowards way of insulting someone..lock them up"

Can you get locked up for insulting someone face to face? Genuine question btw.

Dont know much about it but surely whatever is an offence face to face should be the same if someone is sat behind a keyboard, and the other way around...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The law differentiates between calling someone a dickhead online and impersonating someone with a _iew to completely disrupting their life. An MP has just had her case against such a troller upheld as this disgusting individual even threatened her kids if she didn't back off with her court case against him. He was a 60y/o 'man' in Glouc.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *U1966Man  over a year ago

Devon


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

If the general populace can't be trusted to use the internet properly then it has ot be regulated so that people can go online and not feel threatened. Extreme cases of trolling have ruined people's lives and spilled over into offline harassment.

All ISPs are required to keep data regarding which account is using a particular IP address at a given time and date and that info is matched to times and dates of offences committed. It's like leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a crime."

first time i have agreed with what wishy says

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *umourCouple  over a year ago

Rushden

I do have a problem with this kind of regulation. With the sensibilities of some on THIS forum, about 40% would get locked up! It is the thin edge of wedge..

Of course it is not nice when someone is stalked online (or otherwise) and it is not nice when "real" trolling happens, but we have to tread carefully when introducing laws like this. Next thing may well be.. "Pete & Les are swingers, that is morally corrupt! Not what we want in our cosy little society!" And believe me, they would know! (Maybe they do now )

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs


"

if someone takes their life due to extreme trolling... manslaughter or something similar

otherwise fines and community service

As well meaning as that may well be I am not sure if that would work.. You are going to have to define extreme trolling for a start...

If I was to say to _iew for example "fuck off and die!" and he was to commit suicide, would I be held responsible?"

Trolling was defined on the news this evening as defamatory and slanderous comments, they told a story of a women who was accused of being a pedo and other such comments on Facebook and it took a court order to find out who the perp was.

Also a young girl who was hounded out of school and forced to move from the south to the north east. Punishment its self! sorry couldn't resist! lol

It's like these sick b'tards who go on memorial sites and right disgusting comments!

Punishment should be as harsh as possible!

On another piece of good news I saw that 2 people suspected of taking the plaque commemorating the death of those young boys have been arrested! The plaque has been recovered in damaged!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs


"

if someone takes their life due to extreme trolling... manslaughter or something similar

otherwise fines and community service

As well meaning as that may well be I am not sure if that would work.. You are going to have to define extreme trolling for a start...

If I was to say to _iew for example "fuck off and die!" and he was to commit suicide, would I be held responsible?"

Trolling was defined on the news this evening as defamatory and slanderous comments, they told a story of a women who was accused of being a pedo and other such comments on Facebook and it took a court order to find out who the perp was.

Also a young girl who was hounded out of school and forced to move from the south to the north east. Punishment its self! sorry couldn't resist! lol

It's like these sick b'tards who go on memorial sites and right disgusting comments!

Punishment should be as harsh as possible!

On another piece of good news I saw that 2 people suspected of taking the plaque commemorating the death of those young boys have been arrested! The plaque has been recovered un damaged!!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *heWolfMan  over a year ago

warwickshire

The Govt are trying to define trolling under defamation laws, I don't think you have to be Sherlock Holmes to work out who might benefit from this. Maybe a bunch of useless cunts with their snouts in the trough? Yep, when the economy is going down the toilet, the depths of cosy relationships between media barons and politicians are being exposed, and things ain't going very well for them, what better than to declare war on an imaginary enemy of the people - so-called "Trolls"?

"Trolling" is obviously a new buzzword in Westminster, Ken Clarke was nearly cumming in his adult nappy today when he outlined how he was going to save the country from this "new" threat. What a twat!

Classic Trolling isn't abusing or threatening people, there's plenty of laws that deal with that already, it involves taking the piss out of people who are too stupid to see they are being mocked, or winding people up till they melt down.

(Like the geezer who posted up a long thread showing some baby bunny rabbits, detailed how he was feeding them after they were orphaned. For weeks he laid on the sugar, soooo many people were coo-ing and saying how sweet they were, it was sickly. He went quiet for a couple of days...then started another thread asking for good rabbit pie recipes. The board nearly caught fire! Now THAT'S trolling)

Trolling is posting stupid re_iews to Amazon about, oooh, let's see, products like Veet. Hilarious...unless you are the marketing director of Veet. You are taking the piss out of his serious business. Let's hope he doesn't get the sack and kill himself, eh?

The hounding of people until they kill themselves isn't trivial, but it doesn't need the Govt to get involved. If people didn't feel the need to post up every aspect of their life online, maybe they wouldn't become such easy targets.

Why legislate to "protect" people who have no common sense? Why not encourage them to switch the PC off if they can't handle what people are saying about them? Are the Govt going to define all the terms that might cause offence? Calling you a spastic might not be much of an insult, and much favoured by kids, but if you have a spastic in your family, you might be more sensitive. Perhaps it would be safer for all arguments and differences to be outlawed online, just to be on the safe side?

Life is tough, people are nasty to others, in real life and online. Toughen up and avoid becoming a target, simple as that.

If we have to use the law to "protect" people from bad words, then, like the person above said, it won't be long before the Govt comes riding in to save the moral majority from people like you (and me, of course) - dirty, filthy, immoral, adulterous scum, who will be burning in the Lake of Fire for Eternity etc etc...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

whether trolling is an online thing or not, its pretty indicative of our society...we like to slag off, make jokes about certain groups of people(those in the limelight of showbusiness), it naturally just starts to spill into normal lives and of course the internet.

the only people I think trolling should be of a high issue is with children.That comes with the responsibility of the adult granting them access in whatever form they have access.

I accept trolling isnt a nice thing, but I'm afraid as some have suggested above its about turning off if its causing offense(or relocating elsewhere online), the idea of forcing more laws and consequences I believe would be unmanageable.Focusing on real crime should still be higher on the agenda.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

The hounding of people until they kill themselves isn't trivial, but it doesn't need the Govt to get involved. If people didn't feel the need to post up every aspect of their life online, maybe they wouldn't become such easy targets.

Why legislate to "protect" people who have no common sense? Why not encourage them to switch the PC off if they can't handle what people are saying about them? Are the Govt going to define all the terms that might cause offence? Calling you a spastic might not be much of an insult, and much favoured by kids, but if you have a spastic in your family, you might be more sensitive. Perhaps it would be safer for all arguments and differences to be outlawed online, just to be on the safe side?

Life is tough, people are nasty to others, in real life and online. Toughen up and avoid becoming a target, simple as that.

"

So you're saying that its ok for people to cyber bully others? That it's the fault of the person for being dumb enough to be trolled? So people who get bullied in real life thats their own fault for leaving the house? Thats an attitude I just can't agree with sorry.

The government has just caught up these past few years with how big an impact the internet has on most peoples life. Not only that but how badly regulated it is. I bet you could think of anything that might be considered taboo, put it in a google search and find it. Some topics would probably get you a visit from the cops once they had tracked your IP. It might not be some old lady having her purse snatched but cyber crime is still crime.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yeah more back door regulation of the internet. The Arab spring and its use of the internet has got the establishment worried.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs

this about a persons right to know who it is publishing shite about them or even their business and their right to take them to task over allegations made...

if you disagree with this why are you here?

you have signed up to a web site that tells you too:

Don't badmouth other members or "name and shame":

as much as we all may want to name and shame from time to time we refrain because we wont to remain here.

like a lot of things in life we have to modify and change if we want to live in a civilised society and people who don't have the balls to give their names when trolling are cowards.

far to many don't engage the brains before posting...

and I would agree that to post every single detail about your life seems in my opinion strange but thats because I dont see the point; and I do value my privacy but i'm not going to start maligning them for it.

perhaps the internet should come with a health warning, after all you never know the state of someones mind and just because you think its clever or you believe your humour is funny and acceptable it doesn't automatically follow that others will.

at then end of the day if you wouldn't say it to their face why should you do it on the internet and not face any possible consequence.

an awful lot of companies will do a search on new recruits and some are looking to _iew your private photos and comments on google or the various social networks you are signed up to.

according to those who support trolling who think its a right to do it then it follows that companies also have the right to do this and if they find anything that they decide is against their policies or may bring them into disrepute they wont have to hire or they can fire...

we all have a right to privacy and not to be abused or abuse others..

you have a problem with someone then talk it through or shut the f**k up.

or have i got it wrong..

how many who troll would do it from their companies internet access? i suggest not many and they wait till they get home..

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trolling is a cowards way of insulting someone..lock them up"
not sure thay can lock everyone up but the ones who make peoples life hell and keep doing it and theres no let up need sorting out as can lead to all sorts of things if not stopped . I am glad theres going to be more help out there ... x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Surely if someone bullies/threatens someone by phone or post this would be taken seriously by the law if appropriate.

If someone plasters the neighbourhood with posters of you with the title 'I'm a pedophyle', surely you could go to the police and this will be investigated and the guilty person will be prosecuted.

But on the other hand it's ok to do this on the internet because you know what you signed up for if you access it? I'm sure someone threatened by phone was never told it's their own fault because they have a phone line?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place

Thinking about it, as there is no motive as such, except to do damage to a stranger ,surely this should be a mental health issue with sectioning for persistent offenders,just do not think you can catch and prove who it is, at the moment.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Thinking about it, as there is no motive as such, except to do damage to a stranger ,surely this should be a mental health issue with sectioning for persistent offenders,just do not think you can catch and prove who it is, at the moment."

offs pleasure please lol...having worked with people with mental health issues, its always been the case that those with 'actual' mental health problems fare less around those with shitfuck all wrong with them.

people can be cunts(possibly all their lives)....thats just the harsh truth

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Thinking about it, as there is no motive as such, except to do damage to a stranger ,surely this should be a mental health issue with sectioning for persistent offenders,just do not think you can catch and prove who it is, at the moment.

offs pleasure please lol...having worked with people with mental health issues, its always been the case that those with 'actual' mental health problems fare less around those with shitfuck all wrong with them.

people can be cunts(possibly all their lives)....thats just the harsh truth"

Hi am a cunt i like irritating people online...it makes me feel great annoying people...even to the point that they get so low that they possibly take their lives...its not my fault...Ive an illness..

I'm a trollopath

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ove2-shareCouple  over a year ago

South Gloucestershire

I think there needs to be education in schools about the effects and legal ramifications of trolling too

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

can I just clarify?

are we talking mild trolling, trolling, heavy trolling or extreme trolling here?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

soft trollers, full trollers, hardened trollers?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"can I just clarify?

are we talking mild trolling, trolling, heavy trolling or extreme trolling here?"

Extreme trolling with robson green....its really about fishing tho

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *umourCouple  over a year ago

Rushden

As an update to my earlier comment, there was a lady on BBC Breakfast who was a victim of "Trolling". Before I saw this piece, I would have said that people should grow thicker skins and lets just have the laws we have now.. However...

This lady, in a gentle way, stuck up for someone in a forum about X-Factor. (No it's not her fault for being so silly as to be on an X-Factor forum! ). Over the next weeks and months, her facebook profile was duplicated and people were commenting on "her" timeline. They said she was a peodophile and was a danger to children. There were multiple profiles, all with pictures of her.

Facebook have now been told to supply the information of those responsible, but it may be that this will not happen in full...

I shall have an even bigger smile on my face now, when someone on here accuses others of trolling, they don't know the half of it if they get upset by any of the comments on here...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *umourCouple  over a year ago

Rushden


"Thinking about it, as there is no motive as such, except to do damage to a stranger ,surely this should be a mental health issue with sectioning for persistent offenders,just do not think you can catch and prove who it is, at the moment."

That is such a good idea, we can then give them benefits! Put em on long term sick as well...

They are NOT sick, they are trouble makers! They are people who are brave behind a keyboard and think they can't be found! Keyboard Warriors, short and simple!

You posts are normally what some would call "avant garde". Sometimes it even looks like a bit of lightweight trolling, but this one is just daft!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As an update to my earlier comment, there was a lady on BBC Breakfast who was a victim of "Trolling". Before I saw this piece, I would have said that people should grow thicker skins and lets just have the laws we have now.. However...

This lady, in a gentle way, stuck up for someone in a forum about X-Factor. (No it's not her fault for being so silly as to be on an X-Factor forum! ). Over the next weeks and months, her facebook profile was duplicated and people were commenting on "her" timeline. They said she was a peodophile and was a danger to children. There were multiple profiles, all with pictures of her.

Facebook have now been told to supply the information of those responsible, but it may be that this will not happen in full...

I shall have an even bigger smile on my face now, when someone on here accuses others of trolling, they don't know the half of it if they get upset by any of the comments on here... "

yes thay was on about this on my local radio .... now i love x-factor and yes some dont but theres no need for them to do that ..... this is going to open up all sorts ... i am sure we will be seeing it in papers and news .. some have killed themselfs over stuff on net .... its has to have some sort of control.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

If the general populace can't be trusted to use the internet properly then it has ot be regulated so that people can go online and not feel threatened. Extreme cases of trolling have ruined people's lives and spilled over into offline harassment.

All ISPs are required to keep data regarding which account is using a particular IP address at a given time and date and that info is matched to times and dates of offences committed. It's like leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a crime."

But it should be the ISP's job to regulate and controll the input from the user. If someone is being harrased by someone else, the ISP should be able to block use from the person who is harrasing.......... I don't agree with regulating the internet user......

I agree with the comment that it is a distraction from the real calamity unfolding in front of us.........

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Trolling is a cowards way of insulting someone..lock them up

Can you get locked up for insulting someone face to face? Genuine question btw.

Dont know much about it but surely whatever is an offence face to face should be the same if someone is sat behind a keyboard, and the other way around..."

Yes, I believe you can..... I forget which section it is is, but there was a young man who was arrested because he made a comment about a police horse. The copper arrested him and he was held in remand untill the magistrate dismissed the charge........ There is a big group of policio's trying to get that act ammended......

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

We already have laws covering this we don't need more. If its illegal to do in everyday life it's already illegal on the Internet.

The word trolling is being misused. What the cases in the news are is bullying and harassment and not trolling. Trolling is essentially annoying someone with stupid questions and statements, not being threatening.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ushroom7Man  over a year ago

Bradford


"We already have laws covering this we don't need more. If its illegal to do in everyday life it's already illegal on the Internet.

The word trolling is being misused. What the cases in the news are is bullying and harassment and not trolling. Trolling is essentially annoying someone with stupid questions and statements, not being threatening."

Run that by me again will yer? Ta.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"We already have laws covering this we don't need more. If its illegal to do in everyday life it's already illegal on the Internet.

The word trolling is being misused. What the cases in the news are is bullying and harassment and not trolling. Trolling is essentially annoying someone with stupid questions and statements, not being threatening.

Run that by me again will yer? Ta. "

See your getting the hang of it

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ushroom7Man  over a year ago

Bradford


"We already have laws covering this we don't need more. If its illegal to do in everyday life it's already illegal on the Internet.

The word trolling is being misused. What the cases in the news are is bullying and harassment and not trolling. Trolling is essentially annoying someone with stupid questions and statements, not being threatening.

Run that by me again will yer? Ta.

See your getting the hang of it"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"Thinking about it, as there is no motive as such, except to do damage to a stranger ,surely this should be a mental health issue with sectioning for persistent offenders,just do not think you can catch and prove who it is, at the moment.

That is such a good idea, we can then give them benefits! Put em on long term sick as well...

They are NOT sick, they are trouble makers! They are people who are brave behind a keyboard and think they can't be found! Keyboard Warriors, short and simple!

You posts are normally what some would call "avant garde". Sometimes it even looks like a bit of lightweight trolling, but this one is just daft! "

That's funny i was thinking the same of many of your posts,must be that thing we call opinion

i think we both know that at no time did i advocate, treating these people with kid gloves.

However to clarify,you seem to resent the support people with mental illness get,how can you say THEY are this and THEY are that, how many do you know ,how many have you studied,

psychoanalyzed ,are you even qualified ?

I have no sympathy at all for what troller's do, believe me i have witnessed the results, but remember Homosexuality used to be classed as a mental illness until we found out better.

You may well be right about Troller's, but I like to keep an open mind ,preferring to form an opinion based on facts rather than knee jerk opinion.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

Of course it is. And also to distract people from real issues going on in the UK: health service privatised, disabled people victimised, young people ill educated and abandoned, etc, etc, etc.

Far easier to wield a big stick against some idiots on the internet and take people's mind off the way the country is being steadily wrecked."

Spot on!!

Just as with the £billions being spent to get all of our data from the internet - the new law the tories are pushing in, which we the taxpayer are now going to have to pay, when apparently there was no money to pay for anything else, hence the cuts!

It's largely smokescreens being set-off, so that people are distracted through losing their liberties and all the wonderful institutions we have which are being degraded so much. Goebels et al knew all the tricks to mass propaganda, and we're being tricked with more of it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

Trolls are people who disrupt internet chat, taking things off course, they're not the people who spew hatred etc and hound people.

Any intimidation, bullying etc is just plain wrong, and should be constrained. The internet's probably so global and free that I don't think governments will have much success with stopping chat being railroaded by trolls though. Seems more like a right wing Republican type of stunt to push this through, or appeasement of daily mail readers.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *phroditeWoman  over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"Trolls are people who disrupt internet chat, taking things off course, they're not the people who spew hatred etc and hound people.

Any intimidation, bullying etc is just plain wrong, and should be constrained. The internet's probably so global and free that I don't think governments will have much success with stopping chat being railroaded by trolls though. Seems more like a right wing Republican type of stunt to push this through, or appeasement of daily mail readers."

That was my understanding of "trolling" also but it seems there is either a grey area or people have different concepts. Either way, intimidation, bullying, harrassment and stalking are wrong and should be dealt with. I am not sure that doing so in practice is as easy as we would like it to be.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

If the general populace can't be trusted to use the internet properly then it has ot be regulated so that people can go online and not feel threatened. Extreme cases of trolling have ruined people's lives and spilled over into offline harassment.

All ISPs are required to keep data regarding which account is using a particular IP address at a given time and date and that info is matched to times and dates of offences committed. It's like leaving a fingerprint at the scene of a crime.

But it should be the ISP's job to regulate and controll the input from the user. If someone is being harrased by someone else, the ISP should be able to block use from the person who is harrasing.......... I don't agree with regulating the internet user......

I agree with the comment that it is a distraction from the real calamity unfolding in front of us........."

I agree with you ,it should be the ISP's job ,but they can not do it. If you encrypt traffic coming from your pc and route it via a virtual private network ,bounce it on to one of the many underground black networks (as many serial trollers) do now, its impossible for your ISP to find out what that traffic is, also to find them and prove it was them, even worse if they use a zombie network or hack an individual account ,the innocent can be accused.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"whilst an admirable sentiment, I think this is a smokescreen to slowly introduce the idea of a "regulated internet" -ie everything is spied on.

Of course it is. And also to distract people from real issues going on in the UK: health service privatised, disabled people victimised, young people ill educated and abandoned, etc, etc, etc.

Far easier to wield a big stick against some idiots on the internet and take people's mind off the way the country is being steadily wrecked.

Spot on!!

Just as with the £billions being spent to get all of our data from the internet - the new law the tories are pushing in, which we the taxpayer are now going to have to pay, when apparently there was no money to pay for anything else, hence the cuts!

It's largely smokescreens being set-off, so that people are distracted through losing their liberties and all the wonderful institutions we have which are being degraded so much. Goebels et al knew all the tricks to mass propaganda, and we're being tricked with more of it."

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ushroom7Man  over a year ago

Bradford

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *phroditeWoman  over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

"

You just been hiding under pd's bridge?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

"

Its a good point mushy, but the high profile cases are pretty sick ,by design of course...

The emotions must be massive and difficult to cope with, if you set up a memorial page for a departed family member or close friend as part of the healing process and some one verbally craps all over it.

The BP must go through the roof ,

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

well seems my argument(s) against whatever its called(we all actually know what we mean, lets not nitpick on its terminology eh??)was pretty much ignored.

its not mental illness(though thats not to say there isnt trollers with mental health issues)

its the DONT GIVE A FUCK society- which is mainly bred from horrible people(u cant cure this)

time and time again, I've read there are reasons behind the breakdown in society, slum estates etc etc etc...the truth???- soe people just have that lack of empathy for others, unless it happens right on their own doorstep...it doesnt really matter to them.

my main feeling is the vulnerable groups targeted, which I would mainly say I'd be worried about are children and those in bereavement(which I believe was one of the main cases)

in extreme cases , yes....there is LAW in place as lots have suggested.

there are people who can simply switch off to over the keyboard comments

and we certainly cant let every comment of a trollish nature be brought up to authorities.....people have personal responsibility...take that away from them and they'll want help tying shoelaces...bloddy pee-thebeds.

(please delete my last trollish pee-thebed remark...I dont mean to belittle anyone here who has or had problems pishing the bed)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *phroditeWoman  over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

Its a good point mushy, but the high profile cases are pretty sick ,by design of course...

The emotions must be massive and difficult to cope with, if you set up a memorial page for a departed family member or close friend as part of the healing process and some one verbally craps all over it.

The BP must go through the roof ,"

I have been trying to troll this thread and not been successful I hate being ignored, not just you but Mushy too...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ellAndBobCouple  over a year ago

Farnborough


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

"

But that would be sensible. Can't have people being sensible. Our whole way of life would come crashing down.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *leasureDome OP   Man  over a year ago

all over the place


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

Its a good point mushy, but the high profile cases are pretty sick ,by design of course...

The emotions must be massive and difficult to cope with, if you set up a memorial page for a departed family member or close friend as part of the healing process and some one verbally craps all over it.

The BP must go through the roof ,

I have been trying to troll this thread and not been successful I hate being ignored, not just you but Mushy too... "

we know you are

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *phroditeWoman  over a year ago

(She/ her) in Sensualityland


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

But that would be sensible. Can't have people being sensible. Our whole way of life would come crashing down.

"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

its the DONT GIVE A FUCK society- which is mainly bred from horrible people(u cant cure this)

"

Its more akin to why people from good backgrounds and good jobs joined the looting and rioting last year. Physical anonymity makes people behave in ways they might not normally do so. After a bit of searching I found this "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_disinhibition_effect" which also explains why people troll.

This suggests that the way to stop it is remove people's anonymity.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

its the DONT GIVE A FUCK society- which is mainly bred from horrible people(u cant cure this)

Its more akin to why people from good backgrounds and good jobs joined the looting and rioting last year. Physical anonymity makes people behave in ways they might not normally do so. After a bit of searching I found this "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_disinhibition_effect" which also explains why people troll.

This suggests that the way to stop it is remove people's anonymity....."

or burn the word 'TROLL' on their forehead

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs

[Removed by poster at 15/06/12 11:12:29]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs

[Removed by poster at 15/06/12 11:16:11]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *john121Man  over a year ago

staffs


"

How long would trolls last if.....

people simply ignored the bait and moved on?

"

While simple in design you're talking about emotions, which I'm sure everyone will agree are not always that easy to ignore.

You should also consider the damage this could do to the idividuals personal and proffesional lives and reputations.

A troll is written as being an ugly creature and I consider trolling as an ugly act. Trolls hide in caves and these people hide behind that anonymity of the Internet.

The guardian has an interesting article "what is an Internet troll" dated 12/6

The trolls will still be able to post their 'comments' but now the bullied/victim will be able to trace them and prosecute.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0937

0