 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"
What's your opinion based upon?"
Less deference today.
‘Me me me’ culture.
More aware generally and not just accepting that their elders know better. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I would.
I actually applied to join the army a few years ago, unfortunately something in my past stopped me getting in. "
A past indiscretion should not be automatic rejection, second chance, redemption an all that.
Would an indiscretion rule someone out of conscription? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Perhaps the question is more would there be a point? If you got to the point of conscription, you are looking at a major war where a professional army would be more effective, and then the weapons would be capable of doing the sort of damage that would make conscription irrelevant. Yes, I know, sound like an armchair general  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
What's your opinion based upon?
Less deference today.
‘Me me me’ culture.
More aware generally and not just accepting that their elders know better."
The generation born after the war was literally called the "me" generation, so this is peak projection.
If you want the young to fight for you then stop taking every chance you can get to make them hate you. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"That involved the UK and conscription was enacted.
Would the young fight?
I think a significant minority would not."
You assume the UK would be on the moral side
I could not make that assumption sorry |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *.D.I.D.A.SMan
over a year ago
London/Essex... ish... Romford to be exact |
Anti war sentiment is far stronger with the younger generation. With globalisation I'm not sure national identity/pride can be compared to past generations. Some of us have parents who weren't born here meaning our connection isn't as deep rooted. I think it would largely depend on whether the reasoning for war resonated with people. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think many people are now more questioning about things, quite rightly so. It's not cowardice, just about deciding on whether they're ready to lay down their life, physical and mental well-being for a decision made by a government often with Parliamentary majority. While fighting the Nazis in 1939 might have been a clearer choice, more recent conflicts have cast doubt on the wisdom and moral judgements of governments. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Would you OP? Given levels of fitness and health have improved, if they needed to they'd be across all age ranges"
Trully I dont know. It would depend on the reason, for example I would not fight for Hong Kong residents to come to the UK. I would perhaps defend home soil.
I probably am to old though may be okay for captain Mainwarings home guard.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If conscription was enacted now then it would have to be some massive conflict where modern weapons of war were not having an effect.
Some believe the Third World War has already started and is being fought digitally in cyberspace. If an 'enemy' crippled our seriously infrastructure then it would be more a fight for survival rather than anything else. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
