FabSwingers.com > Forums > London > Group Social
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Sounds good. When you thinking " No idea yet want to see what interest there is 1st. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Sorry I’m too young to attend, hopefully it’s a great night " Will have to try arrange a private social with you. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s all hot air nothing will happen " Nice of you to comment then block us. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can’t it be up to 44 " maybe for you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx " We would be interested and would love to meet other locals but sadly we’re blocked | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx We would be interested and would love to meet other locals but sadly we’re blocked " Turns out you was no idea why. We’ve never spoken to you so can’t see why. Unblocked now though | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can’t it be up to 44 maybe for you" Pretty please | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? " Really? Are you really asking that? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can’t it be up to 44 maybe for you Pretty please " I never got to meet you at the last social so you can definitely come. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I can host tomorrow night? Park Plaza hotel in Westminster. " Good for you but this is a thread for a social | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can’t it be up to 44 maybe for you Pretty please I never got to meet you at the last social so you can definitely come. " Thanks see you at the next one | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s all hot air nothing will happen Nice of you to comment then block us. " I think you’ll find u blocked me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s all hot air nothing will happen Nice of you to comment then block us. I think you’ll find u blocked me " Clearly we made a good choice then. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx " Why have you set an age limit? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Why have you set an age limit?" Why should we not have? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x " Let me get this right you want us to organise a social for over 40’s? There are plenty of socials around London that people over 40 can go too. We was trying to organise a social for the younger crowd in London. As a lot of the socials you will find the attendees are over 40 and not really what we want to play with or drink with. No other socials have been aimed at the younger crowd. Unfortunately the abuse we’ve been getting via private messages from people over 40 has put us off from doing this. Sorry everyone. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x Let me get this right you want us to organise a social for over 40’s? There are plenty of socials around London that people over 40 can go too. We was trying to organise a social for the younger crowd in London. As a lot of the socials you will find the attendees are over 40 and not really what we want to play with or drink with. No other socials have been aimed at the younger crowd. Unfortunately the abuse we’ve been getting via private messages from people over 40 has put us off from doing this. Sorry everyone. " . Stag & Vixen I am sorry to hear that you have been getting abuse from people over the age of 40 who really should know better.It’s your social and you organise it as you see fit you have set a criteria so stick with it.I am sure it will be a great success as it looks like you are targeting age group that perhaps are comfortable attending other socials with people nearer their age group as opposed say to my age group.Best of luck with everything. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x Let me get this right you want us to organise a social for over 40’s? There are plenty of socials around London that people over 40 can go too. We was trying to organise a social for the younger crowd in London. As a lot of the socials you will find the attendees are over 40 and not really what we want to play with or drink with. No other socials have been aimed at the younger crowd. Unfortunately the abuse we’ve been getting via private messages from people over 40 has put us off from doing this. Sorry everyone. . Stag & Vixen I am sorry to hear that you have been getting abuse from people over the age of 40 who really should know better.It’s your social and you organise it as you see fit you have set a criteria so stick with it.I am sure it will be a great success as it looks like you are targeting age group that perhaps are comfortable attending other socials with people nearer their age group as opposed say to my age group.Best of luck with everything." And this is exactly what we was trying to do but have had nothing but grief since suggesting it. It’s fine for other socials to ignore younger people but put an age limit on and we are in the wrong. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x Let me get this right you want us to organise a social for over 40’s? There are plenty of socials around London that people over 40 can go too. We was trying to organise a social for the younger crowd in London. As a lot of the socials you will find the attendees are over 40 and not really what we want to play with or drink with. No other socials have been aimed at the younger crowd. Unfortunately the abuse we’ve been getting via private messages from people over 40 has put us off from doing this. Sorry everyone. . Stag & Vixen I am sorry to hear that you have been getting abuse from people over the age of 40 who really should know better.It’s your social and you organise it as you see fit you have set a criteria so stick with it.I am sure it will be a great success as it looks like you are targeting age group that perhaps are comfortable attending other socials with people nearer their age group as opposed say to my age group.Best of luck with everything. And this is exactly what we was trying to do but have had nothing but grief since suggesting it. It’s fine for other socials to ignore younger people but put an age limit on and we are in the wrong. " . Most of the socials I have attend there hasn’t been many under 40’s about so I can understand where you are coming from and what you are trying to do.I think what you are trying to do is good for the age group you are trying to attract.The social may start of small but in time may grow and develop | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that?" Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that? Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try...." Must be fairly thick if you think at 48 you would of been invited to a 25-40 social. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hi everyone Putting the feelers out to see if there is interest for a social with us and like minded fabbers ages 25-40 Date and Location not set yet but will be local to Croydon/Bromley Stag and Vixen xxx Would def be interested sadly I'm 46 so guess that's me out I see there's a lot of us over 40 replied cud we not extend the boundaries or maybe organise another social for us old people lol x Let me get this right you want us to organise a social for over 40’s? There are plenty of socials around London that people over 40 can go too. We was trying to organise a social for the younger crowd in London. As a lot of the socials you will find the attendees are over 40 and not really what we want to play with or drink with. No other socials have been aimed at the younger crowd. Unfortunately the abuse we’ve been getting via private messages from people over 40 has put us off from doing this. Sorry everyone. " I totally respect what your saying was simply asking the question wasn't expecting you to organise a separate social for us older people was just putting the idea out there and was not criticising you in anyway my apologies if it came over that way and I certainly don't condoned people being rude to you it's your social you invite whom ever you wish. We all get older and we were all younger once to tastes change as do opinions and likes dislikes x age should be just a number I think now but prob if asked when I was younger I'd say different as prob you will when your nearer 50 than 40 anyway hope you have fun and find what you desire I wish you both well xx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that? Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try.... Must be fairly thick if you think at 48 you would of been invited to a 25-40 social. " Sorry!!!!!!!! What was that about people being abusive to you? A simple, sorry but 48 os out of age range, would have done the trick. I was going to say sorry you had got abusive emails and then say do t give up. But, nahhhhhh, beat give up guys. Suits everyone | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that? Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try.... Must be fairly thick if you think at 48 you would of been invited to a 25-40 social. Sorry!!!!!!!! What was that about people being abusive to you? A simple, sorry but 48 os out of age range, would have done the trick. I was going to say sorry you had got abusive emails and then say do t give up. But, nahhhhhh, beat give up guys. Suits everyone" Shouldn’t really need to point that fact out that your over the age limit but then again you should have seen the age limit and not even bothered posting. We have given up bothering to host a social due to people like yourself. Thinking your self entitled to ignore and disrespect what people are looking for. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that? Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try.... Must be fairly thick if you think at 48 you would of been invited to a 25-40 social. Sorry!!!!!!!! What was that about people being abusive to you? A simple, sorry but 48 os out of age range, would have done the trick. I was going to say sorry you had got abusive emails and then say do t give up. But, nahhhhhh, beat give up guys. Suits everyone Shouldn’t really need to point that fact out that your over the age limit but then again you should have seen the age limit and not even bothered posting. We have given up bothering to host a social due to people like yourself. Thinking your self entitled to ignore and disrespect what people are looking for. " All I know is that I am not rude .... Unlike yourself. End of... No more even bothering reading this one anymore. So feel free to be rude and abusive to me... I wont be looking x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"at 48, would I be too old? Really? Are you really asking that? Yes I really am asking.. I gotta try.... Must be fairly thick if you think at 48 you would of been invited to a 25-40 social. Sorry!!!!!!!! What was that about people being abusive to you? A simple, sorry but 48 os out of age range, would have done the trick. I was going to say sorry you had got abusive emails and then say do t give up. But, nahhhhhh, beat give up guys. Suits everyone Shouldn’t really need to point that fact out that your over the age limit but then again you should have seen the age limit and not even bothered posting. We have given up bothering to host a social due to people like yourself. Thinking your self entitled to ignore and disrespect what people are looking for. " . Stag & Vixen don’t give up on trying to host a social for the 25 - 40 group if that is what you want.Forgot the older ones who have been rude & abusive to you if you really want to do it give it a go.You have hit upon a good idea it seems a shame not to follow it through.Best of luck with whatever you decide. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I feel sooo old. " One of us feels that way but doesn’t act it. Say hello? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Count me in please. Although I am 41 ? Ade x" You are too old, they said 40 max. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x" You're too old for them! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them!" What is your problem? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem?" I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. " A lucky escape, methinks | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. " She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. " I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. " I think she made a statement not a question. She was just pointing out to the person that they were too old. I don’t think she would have been questioning why you are excluding older. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. " Actualy, this is a public forum, and and I asked a simple question. It shouldn't result in a tirade of abuse. I'm stepping out now, since I have nothing further to say. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age " And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common" That’s more understandable than saying younger people tend not to want to mingle with all the old folk | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I've been to a few socials, none have had an age limit and everyone has mixed well and enjoyed themselves. Obviously I'm too old to attend, but I would be put off by any social which discrimated on age, race, sezuality or anything else" Again that’s totally fine. But socials and clubs do themed nights. BdSm/BBW/ cubs and cougars and so on. We are tailoring a social to our preference and have had a lot of interest in it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common" I'm sorry, but speaking from my vast experience on fab that is rubbish! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I think she made a statement not a question. She was just pointing out to the person that they were too old. I don’t think she would have been questioning why you are excluding older. " Look further up the thread where she asked a question. Her sentence finished with a question mark generally that signifies a question. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. Actualy, this is a public forum, and and I asked a simple question. It shouldn't result in a tirade of abuse. I'm stepping out now, since I have nothing further to say. " What’s a tirade of abuse? Please explain | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common I'm sorry, but speaking from my vast experience on fab that is rubbish! " Darling that’s your opinion and you are entitled to it....I think you are saying it’s rubbish that people of a similar age range tend to have more in common, but from our experience that has been the case....naturally there are exceptions. We attend other socials and mix with all ages,But our wants and needs are different as a couple to yours as a single female. We are allowed preferences as is anyone else on fab | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"this has now become a free for all sooo, I’m coming. Don’t care if I’m not wanted " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"this has now become a free for all sooo, I’m coming. Don’t care if I’m not wanted " You know your welcome to stay at ours again. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"this has now become a free for all sooo, I’m coming. Don’t care if I’m not wanted You know your welcome to stay at ours again. " Well duhhh, who else with be my maps and feed me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common I'm sorry, but speaking from my vast experience on fab that is rubbish! Darling that’s your opinion and you are entitled to it....I think you are saying it’s rubbish that people of a similar age range tend to have more in common, but from our experience that has been the case....naturally there are exceptions. We attend other socials and mix with all ages,But our wants and needs are different as a couple to yours as a single female. We are allowed preferences as is anyone else on fab " Please don't patronise me, I am not your darling. I was under the impression that group socials were about meeting new people generally and not an opportunity for the organisers to vet possible new play partners. You obviously have your own agenda and I wonder if you'll be asking for face and body pictures next | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"this has now become a free for all sooo, I’m coming. Don’t care if I’m not wanted You know your welcome to stay at ours again. Well duhhh, who else with be my maps and feed me " And get up in the morning to go buy you a toothbrush so you don’t have banging breath | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I’m 22 so would be too young anyway, even if I was anywhere near ya. But I wouldn’t mind socialising with anyone of any age And that’s totally fine as it’s your preference. This is our preference. You like older men, we personally don’t. We was aiming a social at people in our age range as you tend to have more in common I'm sorry, but speaking from my vast experience on fab that is rubbish! Darling that’s your opinion and you are entitled to it....I think you are saying it’s rubbish that people of a similar age range tend to have more in common, but from our experience that has been the case....naturally there are exceptions. We attend other socials and mix with all ages,But our wants and needs are different as a couple to yours as a single female. We are allowed preferences as is anyone else on fab Please don't patronise me, I am not your darling. I was under the impression that group socials were about meeting new people generally and not an opportunity for the organisers to vet possible new play partners. You obviously have your own agenda and I wonder if you'll be asking for face and body pictures next" Oh calling someone darling isn’t patronising actually, but oh well. It’s not about vetting play partners, we do plenty well in the play department. You’ve missed my point. What’s the difference between ours and a bbw/BdSm/cubs and cougars social? The answer is nothing. You don’t know us, you’ve no idea what we’re about....let alone to imply we have an agenda. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"this has now become a free for all sooo, I’m coming. Don’t care if I’m not wanted You know your welcome to stay at ours again. Well duhhh, who else with be my maps and feed me And get up in the morning to go buy you a toothbrush so you don’t have banging breath" That is true.. can’t ask for more | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Whatever, good luck with your social I'm off to deal with my verruca " See you later. Thanks for your input. Your many years of experience on fab has really helped in this situation. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Wow people can be so rude just because they don't fit a preference. Here I was thinking this was a place for grown ups but reading some comments it's like playground bs. OP you do you and just ignore the haters and don't give them your voice by replying to their nonsense Have a great Easter weekend " I do believe rudeness have come from both sides not just people who don’t fit into the criteria. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. " it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. " Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions." Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here " There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. " If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Wow people can be so rude just because they don't fit a preference. Here I was thinking this was a place for grown ups but reading some comments it's like playground bs. OP you do you and just ignore the haters and don't give them your voice by replying to their nonsense Have a great Easter weekend I do believe rudeness have come from both sides not just people who don’t fit into the criteria. " I didn't read everything as too much to read | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. " If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. " Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. " Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x" Please ignore the moaner below your post. She is nothing to do with the social. Just a bitter person. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. " Explain what we are inconsistent with | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with" I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. " We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. " Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. " Wouldn’t of asked you anyway so please don’t flatter yourself thinking we would. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. Wouldn’t of asked you anyway so please don’t flatter yourself thinking we would. " I really wasn’t, it was tongue in cheek. I’m emotionally distraught and can’t contain myself. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. Wouldn’t of asked you anyway so please don’t flatter yourself thinking we would. I really wasn’t, it was tongue in cheek. I’m emotionally distraught and can’t contain myself. " Calm down have a cup of tea and some biscuits. Can recommend hobnobs. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. Wouldn’t of asked you anyway so please don’t flatter yourself thinking we would. I really wasn’t, it was tongue in cheek. I’m emotionally distraught and can’t contain myself. Calm down have a cup of tea and some biscuits. Can recommend hobnobs. " Oh good god no, ugh. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It’s quite amusing to see an OP defend their preference of age setting (fair enough) and be bolshy to anyone that asks if there’s flexibility (one can say sorry but no without being so arsey) but the best bit is the fact that the entitled bolshy attitude is a farce when earlier up the thread they already flexed their age preferences for a 44yr old female, and can’t see that that might also mean others will ask the question ignoring the age stipulation as the OP has already demonstrated it’s not fixed in stone (for some). By all means run your own social how you want to, but check your attitude when you yourself are inconsistent with what you say. it’s becoming quite boring talking about all of this all the time. Yes someone of 44 has been told they can come....it’s someone that one half of us have met before briefly at another social....not that we need to explain. I am sure your replies may come across arsey if you had been the one receiving abuse via private messages about this but your not. Our attitude is not for you to decide on to be honest. Au contraire. I’m perfectly entitled to make a judgement and decision on what I deem your attitude is, darling. Sorry to shatter your illusions. Oh sweetie I am ever so sorry.....I made a mistake....I should of said that despite what you decide on our attitude....it will have zero impact on us and it will not change.....nothing shattered here There’s a great quote from Shakespeare that springs to mind; “methinks the lady doth protest too much”... Anyway, thanks for making me chortle. Good luck with your social, you’ve every right to have your fun however you want. If you read the thread you will see we have only said no to one person. We haven’t rejected anyone else. If you read my comments can you show me where I’ve said otherwise? Very odd. I have no issue with you saying no to anyone, just found it amusing how indignant and incredulous you were as to the audacity of anyone outside of the age range even asking or coming on the thread when you yourself changed your mind on the same thread. Again, I have no problem with you saying yes or no to anyone, just the level of projected butt-hurt you were giving out whilst simultaneously chastising anyone else who asked a question was hypocritical and ahem, demonstrative of a very immature attitude. Apt really. But of course, you’re not bothered with anyone expressing their thoughts. So not bothered you’ve posted another thread. Seriously, I do wish you well. You’ve genuinely delighted me. Wouldn’t of mentioned the other thread if it didn’t bother you. Fairly pathetic you keep coming back. You are just giving us untold entertainment while we do our garden. Cheers. Stop plagiarising my points! Find your own jokes. Explain what we are inconsistent with I already have. I’m not sure how to put it more simply. Also Lisa isn’t bitter at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part, and rude. Again. We aren’t rude at all. That’s subjective and unsubstantiated speculation on your part. Not quite sure you’re getting this. Bless. But I do think trying to imitate my points (even incorrectly) is a form of flattery and I must, for the sake of clarity, say thank you but no thank you. No mixed messages from me. Wouldn’t of asked you anyway so please don’t flatter yourself thinking we would. I really wasn’t, it was tongue in cheek. I’m emotionally distraught and can’t contain myself. Calm down have a cup of tea and some biscuits. Can recommend hobnobs. Oh good god no, ugh. " Was it the hobnobs? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs?" Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs? Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. " Glad you don’t want | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs? Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. Glad you don’t want " Why? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs? Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. Glad you don’t want Why?" You don’t like hobnobs. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I think she made a statement not a question. She was just pointing out to the person that they were too old. I don’t think she would have been questioning why you are excluding older. " She did, further up the thread | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Hey... count me in x You're too old for them! What is your problem? I think what Lisa was trying to point out, was that 1978 was the wrong year to be born. She’s also questioning why we put an age limit on. To be blunt it’s none of her business why we put an age limit on. We shouldn’t need to justify to anyone why we was having an age limit. Most young people don’t really want to go to socials with the older crowd so we thought we would try and cater for the younger side of fab. I think she made a statement not a question. She was just pointing out to the person that they were too old. I don’t think she would have been questioning why you are excluding older. She did, further up the thread" I know. I didn’t read that far up until after it was said. I only saw the biting comment today. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs? Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. Glad you don’t want Why? You don’t like hobnobs. " Ahhh, I didn’t follow your syntax, I inferred another meaning. Biscuits are funny things aren’t they, I had a nice shortbread at a training event the other day and it dawned on me I just never buy them for home. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Oh good god no, ugh. Was it the hobnobs? Nods. I cannae stand a hobnob. Glad you don’t want Why? You don’t like hobnobs. Ahhh, I didn’t follow your syntax, I inferred another meaning. Biscuits are funny things aren’t they, I had a nice shortbread at a training event the other day and it dawned on me I just never buy them for home. " I don’t drink hot drinks or eat biscuits. Am I missing out? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |