Shakespeare was never a long term manager, it was another situation where there was a bump in form after the sacking of the old manager and the owners felt they had to give it to him.
Theres a good squad there though and if they can get the right manager in they'll do well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Shakespeare was never a long term manager, it was another situation where there was a bump in form after the sacking of the old manager and the owners felt they had to give it to him.
Theres a good squad there though and if they can get the right manager in they'll do well."
Agreed. Ruthless as it is, they shouldn't be in the bottom three with the relative quality of their squad |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ohng69Man
over a year ago
athenry |
"Shakespeare was never a long term manager, it was another situation where there was a bump in form after the sacking of the old manager and the owners felt they had to give it to him.
Theres a good squad there though and if they can get the right manager in they'll do well.
Agreed. Ruthless as it is, they shouldn't be in the bottom three with the relative quality of their squad"
It's not surprising at all. He's a very good coach but not good enough to manage a premier league club |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
