 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Curious or am I asking for a friend 
I often read in the papers or online that female students or young girls looking to make some extra cash for whatever they need have a sugar daddy or 2. Has anyone here ever heard of sugar mommies in Ireland? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *3nsesMan
over a year ago
Dublin |
If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why would a woman pay for sex with men, it's not exactly difficult to come by? Unless it's a power thing I suppose
Because I’m worth it…..  "
I'll toss ya a tenner |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *indenMan
over a year ago
Naas which is South West of Dublin |
"Why would a woman pay for sex with men, it's not exactly difficult to come by? Unless it's a power thing I suppose
Because I’m worth it…..
I'll toss ya a tenner "
Thanks you madam, and don’t forget your chance, €8.28.
Please cum again soon……..  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work."
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone."
Yes exactly as I was thinking for sugar mommies it's more of a relationship on the side or a relationship tailored to her needs without the commitment of an actual girlfriend/boyfriend relationship |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Curious or am I asking for a friend
I often read in the papers or online that female students or young girls looking to make some extra cash for whatever they need have a sugar daddy or 2. Has anyone here ever heard of sugar mommies in Ireland? "
Think you mean Diabetes Momma |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Nothing wrong with using what your momma (or daddy) gave you to earn a few quid as long as all are consenting and done with safety as a priority. It needs to be REALLY clear exactly what is being purchased with these gifts though (if anything) because nobody wants to get into a misunderstanding with someone who thinks that he/she is owed some service that was never intended by the other party. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Forget sugar mammy ..what about the tinder swindlers 
I was saying this to a friend last night, I never would have swiped right on him in the first place... one of his pics had him wearing shoes with no socks"
Lol same |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *3nsesMan
over a year ago
Dublin |
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone."
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone.
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about. "
I never denied it was transactional, but it's not just sex. It's putting in time, being there for someone, listening to them etc.
And nobody ever said there was anything wrong with sex work by the way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *3nsesMan
over a year ago
Dublin |
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone.
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about.
I never denied it was transactional, but it's not just sex. It's putting in time, being there for someone, listening to them etc.
And nobody ever said there was anything wrong with sex work by the way."
Alot of sex workers have to put the time in, be there for someone(often more than one), listen to them etc as well.
I would describe a "sugar daughter"(I don't even know if that's the term) who puts in the time to be there, listens etc as someone who is very good at there job and willing to go above and beyond.
The same way an office manager who puts the time or energy into getting to know their staff and is willing to go above and beyond is good at their job, or better than the equivalent who doesn't bother doing any of that.
But the reality is for both of them, if they weren't receiving a financial payment they wouldn't be in that situation and if that financial payment was to stop they would both leave.To me that is the difference between the "relationship" and the "sex worker" label.
I do appreciate nobody said there was anything wrong with sex work as well. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone.
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about.
I never denied it was transactional, but it's not just sex. It's putting in time, being there for someone, listening to them etc.
And nobody ever said there was anything wrong with sex work by the way.
Alot of sex workers have to put the time in, be there for someone(often more than one), listen to them etc as well.
I would describe a "sugar daughter"(I don't even know if that's the term) who puts in the time to be there, listens etc as someone who is very good at there job and willing to go above and beyond.
The same way an office manager who puts the time or energy into getting to know their staff and is willing to go above and beyond is good at their job, or better than the equivalent who doesn't bother doing any of that.
But the reality is for both of them, if they weren't receiving a financial payment they wouldn't be in that situation and if that financial payment was to stop they would both leave.To me that is the difference between the "relationship" and the "sex worker" label.
I do appreciate nobody said there was anything wrong with sex work as well. "
Sugar and daughter on a forum like this do not go together no matter what you are trying to draw up |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone.
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about.
I never denied it was transactional, but it's not just sex. It's putting in time, being there for someone, listening to them etc.
And nobody ever said there was anything wrong with sex work by the way.
Alot of sex workers have to put the time in, be there for someone(often more than one), listen to them etc as well.
I would describe a "sugar daughter"(I don't even know if that's the term) who puts in the time to be there, listens etc as someone who is very good at there job and willing to go above and beyond.
The same way an office manager who puts the time or energy into getting to know their staff and is willing to go above and beyond is good at their job, or better than the equivalent who doesn't bother doing any of that.
But the reality is for both of them, if they weren't receiving a financial payment they wouldn't be in that situation and if that financial payment was to stop they would both leave.To me that is the difference between the "relationship" and the "sex worker" label.
I do appreciate nobody said there was anything wrong with sex work as well. "
Very well teased out explanation/opinion there |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *3nsesMan
over a year ago
Dublin |
"If an older women is turned on by younger men that seems to be easily attainable given the popularity in the whole cougar/milf area.
The whole sugar daddy thing seems to be more aligned to sex work.
Sugar relationships are exactly that, relationships. If someone is wealthy enough to provide an allowance for a "baby", then they could easily just hire escorts instead of actually investing time in someone.
Calling it a relationship certainly does sound cute and adorable.
My description is that 99% of the time a sugar daddy situation is an agreement to provide sexual favours in return for monterary or material gain. A slightly less cute and adorable label.
So throwing a relationship label on it does help avoid the stigma attached to sex work. A nice bit of internal plausible deniability really.
Which brings me to the most important point around all of this - there's nothing wrong with sex work/prostitution/escorting. I think avoiding being honest about what a sugar daddy situation is(or any other dex work situation) just helps reenforce the (very damaging) attitude that sex work is wrong and something to feel ashamed about.
I never denied it was transactional, but it's not just sex. It's putting in time, being there for someone, listening to them etc.
And nobody ever said there was anything wrong with sex work by the way.
Alot of sex workers have to put the time in, be there for someone(often more than one), listen to them etc as well.
I would describe a "sugar daughter"(I don't even know if that's the term) who puts in the time to be there, listens etc as someone who is very good at there job and willing to go above and beyond.
The same way an office manager who puts the time or energy into getting to know their staff and is willing to go above and beyond is good at their job, or better than the equivalent who doesn't bother doing any of that.
But the reality is for both of them, if they weren't receiving a financial payment they wouldn't be in that situation and if that financial payment was to stop they would both leave.To me that is the difference between the "relationship" and the "sex worker" label.
I do appreciate nobody said there was anything wrong with sex work as well.
Very well teased out explanation/opinion there "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
