 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi all been here a week now and have had a few conversations with couples on two occasions I've been asked if I was free to meet to which my reply was do you have any face pics I could see now I am quite convinced they are genuine couples as they had a few meet verifications which read quite well but it's not blind date or dating in the dark so face pic are a must but on both occasions I was blocked do ppl really meet without knowing what the other person /persons look like and should I not ask for face pics  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its strange.
A lot of people insist on you sendin a face pic but dont have any themselves.
Havin said that if you are lookin to swing and they have good verifications, go for it. Meet for a drink and if they dont do it for ya politely tell them. Not everyone is attracted to everyone else.
Good luck. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Lots are reluctant to send them.. incase they get used elsewhere.
We are like that too, which is why we only meet in clubs or parties.
So can see both sides of the argument - you need face pics to see if there is interest, but also there is reluctance to send them for privacy.
If fab removed the watermark - we'd be happier to send them - or we send them via email. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've always had the view that an ordinary photo, clothed, showing your face would have way less embarrassment potential than a pic of you starkers midway through a Mongolian clusterfuck with your mugshot in full view!
I take the point about the fab watermark being at the bottom - but if you were ever rumbled you can easily claim plausible deniability with a 'vanilla' photo - hard to do the same when a shot of you banging away finds its way to your boss/friends/mum !!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I've always had the view that an ordinary photo, clothed, showing your face would have way less embarrassment potential than a pic of you starkers midway through a Mongolian clusterfuck with your mugshot in full view!
I take the point about the fab watermark being at the bottom - but if you were ever rumbled you can easily claim plausible deniability with a 'vanilla' photo - hard to do the same when a shot of you banging away finds its way to your boss/friends/mum !! "
not if they had your username over them - simple user search - oh thats looks like them too in that profile.
currently we have plausible deniability, if it was left with no watermark with your username.
what we do currently works for us..
But as agreed earlier - face pics are the deal breaker or maker.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
