|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
The guys on here vastly outnumber women I have personally seen a lady members inbox (hah I chuckle) and it's no wonder messages don't get seen
why doesn't paying members have priority focused top of the pile messages?
Kinda crap putting your hand in your pocket and paying and you messages never get seen because they are buried in non paying member messages |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
If someone doesn’t want to receive messages from non-site supporters, they can set a filter to block them. That’s their choice. Forcing their inbox to prioritise site supporters wouldn’t be a choice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If someone doesn’t want to receive messages from non-site supporters, they can set a filter to block them. That’s their choice. Forcing their inbox to prioritise site supporters wouldn’t be a choice."
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
obviously can't see the point ....paying for a membership here when your messages never get seen is just chucking money away...I won't be doing it again.
fair enough if they get seen and girl isn't intrested but the fact I'm paying and the messages never even get seen is annoying and I see loads of posts echoing the same. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"If someone doesn’t want to receive messages from non-site supporters, they can set a filter to block them. That’s their choice. Forcing their inbox to prioritise site supporters wouldn’t be a choice."
then they should everyone on a level playing field and make the site pay only.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"If someone doesn’t want to receive messages from non-site supporters, they can set a filter to block them. That’s their choice. Forcing their inbox to prioritise site supporters wouldn’t be a choice.
then they should everyone on a level playing field and make the site pay only.
"
But everyone IS on a level playing field in respect of messages, as it is not a requirement to be a site supporter in order to send them - unlike the vast majority of other sites.
Being a site supporter is a choice. You choose whether or not you wish to help towards the cost of keeping the site going. And whilst it provides additional features, it is not a guarantee of anything. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"obviously can't see the point ....paying for a membership here when your messages never get seen is just chucking money away...I won't be doing it again.
fair enough if they get seen and girl isn't intrested but the fact I'm paying and the messages never even get seen is annoying and I see loads of posts echoing the same."
How do you know the woman hasn’t looked at your profile before opening your message and decided based on that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"obviously can't see the point ....paying for a membership here when your messages never get seen is just chucking money away...I won't be doing it again.
fair enough if they get seen and girl isn't intrested but the fact I'm paying and the messages never even get seen is annoying and I see loads of posts echoing the same.
How do you know the woman hasn’t looked at your profile before opening your message and decided based on that?"
Exactly. Most women view in mode |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"If someone doesn’t want to receive messages from non-site supporters, they can set a filter to block them. That’s their choice. Forcing their inbox to prioritise site supporters wouldn’t be a choice.
then they should everyone on a level playing field and make the site pay only.
"
Now you’re contradicting yourself. That would just make it the same as it is now, but your message would be swamped by other site supporters instead.
Anyway, how do you know the women you’re messaging have 1,000s of messages and yours has got lost? How do you know they don’t already have filters on? There could be a lot of reasons why your messages haven’t been read, you’re just assuming that it’s non-site supporters to blame. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
How about we change the system so that non-fee paying females have to meet with at least 1 fee paying male every month just to keep their accounts open and prove they exist. That would help out all those frustrated guys who feel they're not getting the response they deserve here... lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic