FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > #FabFet pt 2
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo." Never going to happen as I said in my comment in last thread.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo." So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? " I mean, there are lots of very profitable bad ideas out there | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"#FabFet Let's get people talking and make this happen Fuzz" A great idea that I am definitely In | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"#FabFet Let's get people talking and make this happen Fuzz" You’ve got my vote | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Followed the previous thread and there were some good points made for and against fabfet. The one about a different forum here; the negatives for it would be we still wouldn't be able to discuss or put up pictures we would like, also I personally think we would need moderators with an understanding of the scene too. The positives would be that it would be easier for those with these interests to get to know each other, plus be good for total novices to have a peek. One point made on the other thread about using the established site, and going to munches etc. That is sound advice. But one drawback is that it's sometimes difficult to go to such things due to living in rural areas, work, childcare etc. Having a place which was inclusive for people who want to give something a go without snobbery would be good. Also as we do here on fab have a forum so people can discuss their kinks and fets without being shamed would be beneficial. With regards to people's worry about the confusion between bsdm and sex if it was a new site then that could be clearly stated by those who already know this. " This is well put together and exactly my thoughts x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? I mean, there are lots of very profitable bad ideas out there " Hahaha funny Still a good idea | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Thank you EVERYone for your input. This is why Fab is brilliant it allows respectful (usually) open dialogue. If anyone in support of FabFet feels the need or desire to contact the site expressing the suggestion of the idea of FabFet. Fuzz" How would we go about that Fuzz? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Thank you EVERYone for your input. This is why Fab is brilliant it allows respectful (usually) open dialogue. If anyone in support of FabFet feels the need or desire to contact the site expressing the suggestion of the idea of FabFet. Fuzz How would we go about that Fuzz? " At the very bottom of your homepage is a 'contact' option. Tap that and suggest some feedback to the site. Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo. So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? " My personal bet is that they wouldn't be. They already take a fairly conservative stance regarding what can be discussed and what images can be shared so it would take a considerable shift in mindset. The site seem to take a better safe than sorry stance (and I fully understand why) and a similar stance on a fet site just wouldn't work. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think that a separate forum would be a good idea, especially as any discussion of kink or fetish gets drowned out and kink shaming seems permissable. There's a separate one for games (which people don't really bother about) why not fet? " Because they don't actually want us to talk about a lot of aspects of it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes! A second thread. FabFet. A user friendly site for kinky swingers, vanilla/soft kinksters, newbies, novices and beginners to the world's of fet and BDSM who may find it a bit intimidating, extreme or intense and off putting. I've had the idea of FabFet for a few years now and every time I mention it there's a small amount of interest. I'm now wondering how much interest. So for all you kinky forumites, what say you? Show your support and lets see if the Fab powers to be are watching and listening. Fuzz" A new site, no. A new forum, yes. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Wouldn’t the statistics on this just end up like FAB ? Thousands of single males, a few couples and 3 females.........but wearing PVC ? " I'm already in PVC | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes! A second thread. FabFet. A user friendly site for kinky swingers, vanilla/soft kinksters, newbies, novices and beginners to the world's of fet and BDSM who may find it a bit intimidating, extreme or intense and off putting. I've had the idea of FabFet for a few years now and every time I mention it there's a small amount of interest. I'm now wondering how much interest. So for all you kinky forumites, what say you? Show your support and lets see if the Fab powers to be are watching and listening. Fuzz A new site, no. A new forum, yes. " Baby steps, you mean? Nah. Go big or go home Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo. So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? My personal bet is that they wouldn't be. They already take a fairly conservative stance regarding what can be discussed and what images can be shared so it would take a considerable shift in mindset. The site seem to take a better safe than sorry stance (and I fully understand why) and a similar stance on a fet site just wouldn't work." If it was run by people considered to be well regarded and respected, experienced 'experts' in the kink community? If that were possible? Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think that a separate forum would be a good idea, especially as any discussion of kink or fetish gets drowned out and kink shaming seems permissable. There's a separate one for games (which people don't really bother about) why not fet? " This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo. So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? My personal bet is that they wouldn't be. They already take a fairly conservative stance regarding what can be discussed and what images can be shared so it would take a considerable shift in mindset. The site seem to take a better safe than sorry stance (and I fully understand why) and a similar stance on a fet site just wouldn't work. If it was run by people considered to be well regarded and respected, experienced 'experts' in the kink community? If that were possible? Fuzz" So you want the site owners to set up a site for someone else to run? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo. So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? My personal bet is that they wouldn't be. They already take a fairly conservative stance regarding what can be discussed and what images can be shared so it would take a considerable shift in mindset. The site seem to take a better safe than sorry stance (and I fully understand why) and a similar stance on a fet site just wouldn't work. If it was run by people considered to be well regarded and respected, experienced 'experts' in the kink community? If that were possible? Fuzz So you want the site owners to set up a site for someone else to run?" I would presume the owners would use the more experienced and regarded to moderate and administrate, much as they do on this site, no? Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"BIG all the way x" Size Queen? . Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes! A second thread. FabFet. A user friendly site for kinky swingers, vanilla/soft kinksters, newbies, novices and beginners to the world's of fet and BDSM who may find it a bit intimidating, extreme or intense and off putting. I've had the idea of FabFet for a few years now and every time I mention it there's a small amount of interest. I'm now wondering how much interest. So for all you kinky forumites, what say you? Show your support and lets see if the Fab powers to be are watching and listening. Fuzz A new site, no. A new forum, yes. Baby steps, you mean? Nah. Go big or go home Fuzz" Not when the setting up of a new site would cost more than a forum. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This sounds like a terrible idea tbh. The owners of this site don't seem to have any real interest in the BDSM/fetish scene (they don't seem to take an interest in the entirety of the swinging scene) so it'll just be Fabs with a new logo. So they wouldn't be interested in setting up a new business and making more money, with those extra £5 rolling in? My personal bet is that they wouldn't be. They already take a fairly conservative stance regarding what can be discussed and what images can be shared so it would take a considerable shift in mindset. The site seem to take a better safe than sorry stance (and I fully understand why) and a similar stance on a fet site just wouldn't work. If it was run by people considered to be well regarded and respected, experienced 'experts' in the kink community? If that were possible? Fuzz" Well let them set up their own site. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Followed the previous thread and there were some good points made for and against fabfet. The one about a different forum here; the negatives for it would be we still wouldn't be able to discuss or put up pictures we would like, also I personally think we would need moderators with an understanding of the scene too. " I don't need to know anything about politics for example to know what is allowed to be posted on the site. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Followed the previous thread and there were some good points made for and against fabfet. The one about a different forum here; the negatives for it would be we still wouldn't be able to discuss or put up pictures we would like, also I personally think we would need moderators with an understanding of the scene too. I don't need to know anything about politics for example to know what is allowed to be posted on the site. " Amd I also think that the idea that a separate forum would avoid kink shaming is potentially naive | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Sounds interesting to us. We like the idea of kink and BDSM but wouldn't really know where to start! X" I'm in the same boat too, would be good to have a new forum section | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"80% of 'normal' BDSM photos and activities wouldn't pass the current sencorship. Anyone already active or genuinely interested in BDSM activities would already have a profile on the main current site. Can think of many reasons why they'd want to keep them separate too. " Everything has it merits good and bad you should go for it we will all be on it and we will be looking at something different something amazing something exciting something special something fantastic something extra sensual !!!!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"80% of 'normal' BDSM photos and activities wouldn't pass the current sencorship. True. Anyone already active or genuinely interested in BDSM activities would already have a profile on the main current site. Also true but what about the ones, myself included, who don't use the site to its full potential because of functionality issues? Can think of many reasons why they'd want to keep them separate too. And that's fine too but again what about the ones who do want to mix up their swinging and kink? " Is there anyone on the other site and gets on with it, willing to start up a discussion on there about The idea of FabFet? Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"80% of 'normal' BDSM photos and activities wouldn't pass the current sencorship. Anyone already active or genuinely interested in BDSM activities would already have a profile on the main current site. Can think of many reasons why they'd want to keep them separate too. Everything has it merits good and bad you should go for it we will all be on it and we will be looking at something different something amazing something exciting something special something fantastic something extra sensual !!!!! " Sorry but don't follow what you're say? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"80% of 'normal' BDSM photos and activities wouldn't pass the current sencorship. True. Anyone already active or genuinely interested in BDSM activities would already have a profile on the main current site. Also true but what about the ones, myself included, who don't use the site to its full potential because of functionality issues? Can think of many reasons why they'd want to keep them separate too. And that's fine too but again what about the ones who do want to mix up their swinging and kink? Is there anyone on the other site and gets on with it, willing to start up a discussion on there about The idea of FabFet? Fuzz" Personally I think most like myself keep it separate. Most on here don't understand the dybamuc requirements nor appreciated the trust and boundries required. Here it's aimed at NSA whether group fun or individual and then move on to the next. I'm sure others may think differently but best of luck. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"80% of 'normal' BDSM photos and activities wouldn't pass the current sencorship. True. Anyone already active or genuinely interested in BDSM activities would already have a profile on the main current site. Also true but what about the ones, myself included, who don't use the site to its full potential because of functionality issues? Can think of many reasons why they'd want to keep them separate too. And that's fine too but again what about the ones who do want to mix up their swinging and kink? Is there anyone on the other site and gets on with it, willing to start up a discussion on there about The idea of FabFet? Fuzz Personally I think most like myself keep it separate. Most on here don't understand the dybamuc requirements nor appreciated the trust and boundries required. Here it's aimed at NSA whether group fun or individual and then move on to the next. I'm sure others may think differently but best of luck. " FabFet may help those who don't understand the dynamics of kink and fet, to understand it a bit better. It's the seemingly non-inclusive attitude of some on the other site, those who are entitled to keep the two separate, that deter others away. I'm just suggesting a place where those people who want to learn and explore kink safely, but can't get in through the other site for the reasons mentioned in these threads, can go. To fill that gap and bring in a bit of all inclusive, respectful, non judgemental swinging attitude to kinky play. Not that the kink and Fet scene is lacking in respectful, inclusive nonjudgmental attitude. I appreciate that some of us want to keep the kink and swinging seperate, but what about those of us who don't? What about us who want to swink? Fuzz | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Is there anyone on the other site and gets on with it, willing to start up a discussion on there about The idea of FabFet? Fuzz" Im a big user of the other site but considering fab won’t allow the use of the other sites name in the forum or to send links to it even privately I definitely won’t be discussing a fab version of a fet site on there! Unless you meant a generic swing/fet crossover site possibility completely unrelated fab as a business? I also know someone who considered this idea. I think it would be well received but it’s the cost and feasibility of set up. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |