 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
They need to implement punishments for people that send abusive messages after being rejected.
Also need to implement a system where a profile user can set up a quiz for people looking to meet so people can be assured someone looks at their profile because I'm sick of abusive people who couldn't take a minute to look at someone's profile. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They need to implement punishments for people that send abusive messages after being rejected.
Also need to implement a system where a profile user can set up a quiz for people looking to meet so people can be assured someone looks at their profile because I'm sick of abusive people who couldn't take a minute to look at someone's profile."
How would you quiz someone if the profile simply says "just ask" or "looking for fun"? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They need to implement punishments for people that send abusive messages after being rejected.
Also need to implement a system where a profile user can set up a quiz for people looking to meet so people can be assured someone looks at their profile because I'm sick of abusive people who couldn't take a minute to look at someone's profile.
How would you quiz someone if the profile simply says "just ask" or "looking for fun"?"
A woman profile never says that just a mans who cant be bothered to put any effort in and they are the ones on here complaining they cant get a meet  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *isaB45Woman
over a year ago
Fabville |
"Also need to implement a system where a profile user can set up a quiz for people looking to meet so people can be assured someone looks at their profile because I'm sick of abusive people who couldn't take a minute to look at someone's profile."
1. The profile user can put as much or as little into their profile as they wish.
2. Why have a quiz, when you can:
a) have a conversation.
b) delete unwanted messages (with or without sending a reply), and
c) block unwanted groups of site users from looking at your profile and/or messaging you.
Hope this helps. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *adetMan
over a year ago
South of Ipswich |
I honestly wouldn't change a thing about Fab
It works perfectly well for those who know how to use it
When other sites have started tinkering around it has invariably resulted in people leaving in droves |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andKBCouple
over a year ago
Plymouth |
Main thing for me is the interface. It's a real throwback to the 90's, pretty much disregarding all advancements made in usability since, especially for Web applications.
The whole tech stack feels dated judging by how easily it struggles when there is a busy period.
Just the view of a Web and software developer. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Tighter photo mods, Theres to many fakes and non person photos getting through the first line of defense.
All new members should face a 3 Mod interview that gets verified by a MOD-GOD.
All new members should provide a photo verification of a passport scan and a full work history,If they break site rules there details should be made public (professional or not)
Members of the press should have a special forum where they can entice folk to "spill the beans" for a fee.
Those "working the site by redirections to pay sites" should be made to declare it to the tax man.
But apart from that just leave it as it is  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They need to implement punishments for people that send abusive messages after being rejected.
Also need to implement a system where a profile user can set up a quiz for people looking to meet so people can be assured someone looks at their profile because I'm sick of abusive people who couldn't take a minute to look at someone's profile.
How would you quiz someone if the profile simply says "just ask" or "looking for fun"?
A woman profile never says that just a mans who cant be bothered to put any effort in and they are the ones on here complaining they cant get a meet "
There are lots of ways around those complaints, mostly delete and block??? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How would you quiz someone if the profile simply says "just ask" or "looking for fun"?
A woman profile never says that..."
Sorry, but oh yes they do. I see enough of them to be quite sure of that.
And you can add "will fill in later" to the list of dodgy profile texts. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How would you quiz someone if the profile simply says "just ask" or "looking for fun"?
A woman profile never says that...
Sorry, but oh yes they do. I see enough of them to be quite sure of that."
The last person to view my profile had a description: "I am a 50 year old straight woman and I'm looking to meet men". Straight from the default settings. No list of interests, no verifications, no photos. How do you quiz someone based on that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
They are a significant number of female pofioes stating "just ask". You clearly have not read all the female profiles.
Fabswingers.com is becooming more of a dating site "one person to have regular social meets and sex with". "Just here to chat with gentlemen" "Not here to meet just want to talk to nice men" " just looking forva regular partner.
Fabswingers.com is /has become a dating site.
When I was here years ago Fabswingers.com was about Sex with an edge and fun yet it was safe.
what about dividing Fab into different sections. Let the those women as I only look at female profile here msybe male profiles wanting the same on here.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tighter photo mods, Theres to many fakes and non person photos getting through the first line of defense.
All new members should face a 3 Mod interview that gets verified by a MOD-GOD.
All new members should provide a photo verification of a passport scan and a full work history,If they break site rules there details should be made public (professional or not)
Members of the press should have a special forum where they can entice folk to "spill the beans" for a fee.
Those "working the site by redirections to pay sites" should be made to declare it to the tax man.
But apart from that just leave it as it is "
that would definitely be the way to go if the admin are looking for people to boycott the site |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I would like a search area by county. I’m in the south east but my search area is up to Oxford, across to Margate and includes Southampton and beyond. "
Good shout, I’d certainly vote for that as well! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Tighter photo mods, Theres to many fakes and non person photos getting through the first line of defense.
All new members should face a 3 Mod interview that gets verified by a MOD-GOD.
All new members should provide a photo verification of a passport scan and a full work history,If they break site rules there details should be made public (professional or not)
Members of the press should have a special forum where they can entice folk to "spill the beans" for a fee.
Those "working the site by redirections to pay sites" should be made to declare it to the tax man.
But apart from that just leave it as it is "
Those are great ideas.
To kill the site stone dead.....
I can't see many people joining under that regime.
How do you see the 3 mod interview being implemented? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *emasselMan
over a year ago
Edinburgh |
"Tighter photo mods, Theres to many fakes and non person photos getting through the first line of defense.
All new members should face a 3 Mod interview that gets verified by a MOD-GOD.
All new members should provide a photo verification of a passport scan and a full work history,If they break site rules there details should be made public (professional or not)
Members of the press should have a special forum where they can entice folk to "spill the beans" for a fee.
Those "working the site by redirections to pay sites" should be made to declare it to the tax man.
But apart from that just leave it as it is "
Your post would have more credibility if you recognised that there is a place and what you meant to say was 'their.' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
