Nice addition being able to add videos. Just throwing an idea out there.
Add the option to be video verified. And get rid of photo verification.
Clear video of you saying your profile name is a lot more secure and trustworthy then a pic with name written on paper.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense."
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense.
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them."
Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense.
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.
Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden. "
what should be public? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense.
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.
Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.
what should be public?"
Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense.
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.
Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.
what should be public?
Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified. "
You don’t have to show your verifications, you can choose to show just the numbers of verifications. Not everyone wants people knowing who and how many they have met.
Every feature on here should be useable on an opt in basis. It’s up to everyone else if they want to risk meeting you or not if you’ve opted in to any particular feature or not. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Totally agree.
We put that idea forward the day they released the video option.
It makes a lot of sense.
How does it make a lot of sense?
You can’t force someone to photo verify, you can’t force anyone to video verify.
There are fake profiles that have been photo verified, there are some not photo verified that are very real.
To protect people’s anonymity, you don’t have to show your face in the photo verification pic. One assumes that you wouldn’t in any video verification, so what’s to stop people from editing audio onto the video?
The only verification that works is actually meeting the person. Verification from others may not be genuine, unless of course you’ve met those who have verified them.
Totally agree...in the Admin criteria you need to be “well” verified....I would of thought they should be public and not hidden.
what should be public?
Verifications showing the profile to be “well” verified.
You don’t have to show your verifications, you can choose to show just the numbers of verifications. Not everyone wants people knowing who and how many they have met.
Every feature on here should be useable on an opt in basis. It’s up to everyone else if they want to risk meeting you or not if you’ve opted in to any particular feature or not."
I fully understand that, I’ve been here for many years.
During the trial I’m sure we all need to be reassured that all trial profiles meet the Admin Criteria and aren’t being given privileges beyond the boundaries. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
