 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi admin
Is there any way we can have a filter at the top of ‘who looked at me’ to filter out the sex/ couples we are looking for eg females/ MF etc.
Sometimes we like to take the first step and give them a wink after they’ve initially taken a peek....
Helps break the ice
Mrs P x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *SAchickWoman
over a year ago
Hillside desolate |
"I think if you adjust your message filters and block every sex your not looking for from messaging you then only those you are looking for will show on your "who's looked" list"
I think you're right  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Message filters play no part in showing, or not showing, who looked at me. As said above the only ones who don't show are stealthy peekers "
Not quite.
If you block single men from mailing you they will no longer appear on your who looked list. This doesn't work for all other genders. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ankie303Woman
over a year ago
Weirdsville South Coast Dorset |
"Message filters play no part in showing, or not showing, who looked at me. As said above the only ones who don't show are stealthy peekers
Not quite.
If you block single men from mailing you they will no longer appear on your who looked list. This doesn't work for all other genders."
Learn something new every day! That's a little unfair really seeing as I have single woman blocked on filters yet they constantly appear on who's looked at me, it's not just single guys that can be a nuisance  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Why not just go out and make the initial contact its the best option as long as you have the self confidence to do so. "
Oh we do!
But sometimes when you’ve had 1000s look at you in a day- it’s nice to narrow it down to who may be of interest at that specific time and desire.....
X |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Please, pretty please admin...
We were blown away with 3000 viewings Yesterday - we need to just whittle it down to what we’re searching for.
I can only imagine what it’s like for those in the top hot lists...
Surely this is what the ‘looked at feature’ is for?
Mrs P X
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lan157Man
over a year ago
a village near Haywards Heath in East Sussex |
"Please, pretty please admin...
We were blown away with 3000 viewings Yesterday - we need to just whittle it down to what we’re searching for.
I can only imagine what it’s like for those in the top hot lists...
Surely this is what the ‘looked at feature’ is for?
Mrs P X
"
The people that show on your "whose looked at me" are only those who are not using stealth mode so the actual number would be greater. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago
ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL |
"As far as I know, the only group who won't show on your "who's looked" list, other than those in stealth mode, are single males, if you have them blocked."
This is correct. MF, TV/CD, MM & FF still show in mine. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *good-being-badMan
over a year ago
mis-types and auto corrects leads cock leeds |
"Please, pretty please admin...
We were blown away with 3000 viewings Yesterday - we need to just whittle it down to what we’re searching for.
I can only imagine what it’s like for those in the top hot lists...
Surely this is what the ‘looked at feature’ is for?
Mrs P X
"
Looking at and being interested are vastly different, how can they know their interest without looking.
If they were interested (filters allowing) they'd contact you.. no ?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Why does it matter who looked at you? If they were interested thayd had have got in touch?
Surely it makes more sense to use the search function and find people who fit what you're looking for and haven't already rejected you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hi admin
Is there any way we can have a filter at the top of ‘who looked at me’ to filter out the sex/ couples we are looking for eg females/ MF etc.
Sometimes we like to take the first step and give them a wink after they’ve initially taken a peek....
Helps break the ice
Mrs P x"
And this is why I stealth look.
I'm not sure what the reason for 'looked at me' is but as said above if I look and don't get in touch then the very last thing I want is a wink or message from them |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Aha you see m this is why we all have different choices.
Some go stealth, some like to be shown.
Some have a quick peek, some wink, some like to message.
Let people have choice to use what they want, how they want. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Not necessarily
Some may not have had time. Some may be shy, some may think you wouldn’t be interested.
If we notice someone has looked a few times, but not messaged... or have liked pics and not messaged, does that mean we shouldn’t contact them.
What you do. Is YOUR choice. Not ours, or even the next person.
Just similar to how some people use the hotlist as people who they find hot, some as not etc. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
