FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Video on site

Video on site

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *s.KerryTV/TS  over a year ago

Blackpool

Search the forums you will find quite a few threads on this topic. For me? Not a chance, the moderators have enough to do already, plus there are numerous sites out there where you can post videos

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *adeiteWoman  over a year ago

Stafford

Nah. Would be full of men wanking. And most women are sick of seeing only cock pictures as is.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *SAchickWoman  over a year ago

Hillside desolate

Plenty of other sites if I wanted to watch thousands of wanking videos.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Summed up well enough.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

The site is predominantly free and the owners would see huge cost increases for bandwidth and storage of video - so they'd need income to cover it.

It would attract different types of users to now and people already complain about others messing them around, being unreliable or just chatting to get access to wank materials. It would probably magnify this X 1000, potentially losing the right people who would get pissed off.

Increasing your costs, whilst losing the right customers, offering a video hosting service that's free elsewhere, doesn't appear to be the brightest move. It's their site though.

UK porn site law changes may also impact the site too if pursued. Higher costs, more staff needed etc.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The reality would be the moderators would have to go through hours of clips it would put a huge strain on them.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The reality would be the moderators would have to go through hours of clips it would put a huge strain on them. "

Especially there right arm

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The site is predominantly free and the owners would see huge cost increases for bandwidth and storage of video - so they'd need income to cover it.

It would attract different types of users to now and people already complain about others messing them around, being unreliable or just chatting to get access to wank materials. It would probably magnify this X 1000, potentially losing the right people who would get pissed off.

Increasing your costs, whilst losing the right customers, offering a video hosting service that's free elsewhere, doesn't appear to be the brightest move. It's their site though.

UK porn site law changes may also impact the site too if pursued. Higher costs, more staff needed etc. "

I'd be 100% happy if fab started charging for there service, it would cut a lot of armchair wankers out of the site , those who just sit at ho.e n make different accounts up daily ffs

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *erlin76Man  over a year ago

Liverpool


"The site is predominantly free and the owners would see huge cost increases for bandwidth and storage of video - so they'd need income to cover it.

It would attract different types of users to now and people already complain about others messing them around, being unreliable or just chatting to get access to wank materials. It would probably magnify this X 1000, potentially losing the right people who would get pissed off.

Increasing your costs, whilst losing the right customers, offering a video hosting service that's free elsewhere, doesn't appear to be the brightest move. It's their site though.

UK porn site law changes may also impact the site too if pursued. Higher costs, more staff needed etc.

I'd be 100% happy if fab started charging for there service, it would cut a lot of armchair wankers out of the site , those who just sit at ho.e n make different accounts up daily ffs "

Yeah i get what you mean. There are a lot of people with many accounts. Catfishing too

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster

I would support a 20 second voice introduction to be included on a profile

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ylonSlutTV/TS  over a year ago

Durham


"I would support a 20 second voice introduction to be included on a profile "

Sounds like a good idea but we all know that 99% of the videos would be guys wanking

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster


"I would support a 20 second voice introduction to be included on a profile

Sounds like a good idea but we all know that 99% of the videos would be guys wanking "

no I meant a voice message not video , yeh guys cud be wanking on them but for me that would just the numpties out

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *tingly ByronMan  over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times . "

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *eeleyWoman  over a year ago

Dudley

Nope, it's just extea hassle.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *us man1957Man  over a year ago

Guildford


"Nope, it's just extea hassle."
here here

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster


"Nope, it's just extea hassle.here here "
well if it did become a feature you have the choice of not using it

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *andyblokeMan  over a year ago

birmingham

We do already pay of course to become a silver member or gold although it can be free,of course maybe it shouldnt be free? and just silver and gold?? i get fed up with timewasters on here in amongst all the really nice genuine people.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues."

I think they are also volunteers who give up some of their free time to help out too.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *tingly ByronMan  over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues.

I think they are also volunteers who give up some of their free time to help out too. "

I said that. But with more words.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *rotic-TouchTV/TS  over a year ago

doncaster


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues.

I think they are also volunteers who give up some of their free time to help out too. "

I would be willing to give up some free time to moderate this ,sure others would too

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues."

Wow .. That's going to be a lot of footage for admin to watch. They do a great job and most are volunteers. How will they cope with all that?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

  

By *tingly ByronMan  over a year ago

In a town Fab forgot


"Do we videos on site so we can upload our fun times .

Currently 28,232 members logged in.

Say only 10% of them upload a 3 minute clip every day.

That's 141 hours of clips the moderators have to watch before approving, every day.

Assume an 8 hour day, that's 18 more moderators every day.

Apart from the moderators are very much part time and probably don't do an 8 hour day, it's an unworkable proposition.

Not forgetting bandwidth, additional cost and any related security issues.

Wow .. That's going to be a lot of footage for admin to watch. They do a great job and most are volunteers. How will they cope with all that? "

We're about to find out......

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

0.0156

0