FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Site Improvements
Site Improvements
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Some ideas on how to improve this site:
1. New members cannot delete their profile for 24 hours after joining.
2. New members should be given 5 days to verify their profile or have their profile deleted.
3. All existing unverified profiles should be given 10 days to verify their profile or have their profile deleted.
4. Non Site Supporters should have their permissions curbed (e.g. no unlimited blocks, no message filters).
What do people think? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *s.KerryTV/TS
over a year ago
Blackpool |
Why on earth should people have to verify? Just because they are not does not mean they fake etc. These threads pop up every so often, generally from relatively new members who think they could run the site better than the current owners. Me? I don't give a monkey's, it's my choice if I do or I don't, and that's the way it should remain in my opinion  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I have been a member of this site on and off for a number of years. So, don’t assume I don’t know what I’m talking about just because I have recently rejoined.
Also, if admin know how to run this site so well then why do they have a “Site Improvement” Group in the Forum?
Verification is a way of separating the chaff from the wheat. There are too many fakes on here that are left unchecked and unchallenged. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *s.KerryTV/TS
over a year ago
Blackpool |
Did I refer to you personally? No I did not, I spoke in general terms. It's not site improvements by the way, it's site feedback. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Oh, I know it was a swipe at me!
And for the record I was providing “feedback” on how to improve the site, seeing as how you insist on being so pedantic. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Verified doesn't mean shit people give fake veris all the time |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
I've been messed around by well verified men , being verified is not a guarantee that your time won't be wasted |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
That seems pretty draconian to me. I certainly wouldn't have stuck around long enough to decide to support the site without unlimited blocks or filters. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
1. People can't be forced to stay
2. If you use message filters unverified people can't annoy you/ message you
3. If you use message filters unverified people can't annoy you/ message you
4. I am not sure why you want this other than to mail anyone you want to even if they don't want you to |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You should be able to change your date of birth more than ones.
As I am a moron and put it in twice. Both wrong lol x |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You should be able to change your date of birth more than ones.
As I am a moron and put it in twice. Both wrong lol x"
That's to stop people changing it all the time to get around age filters |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"You should be able to change your date of birth more than ones.
As I am a moron and put it in twice. Both wrong lol x"
Contact Admin and explain that you mistakenly put it in wrong. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
1. No
2. No
3. No
4. No
My opinion. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Another suggestion ...
If you have “Not looking for single men” on your profile then you shouldn’t be able message men! Filters should work both ways, not one way only! |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"You should be able to change your date of birth more than ones.
As I am a moron and put it in twice. Both wrong lol x"
It's really difficult to remember your date of birth isn't it  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"Another suggestion ...
If you have “Not looking for single men” on your profile then you shouldn’t be able message men! Filters should work both ways, not one way only! "
Why? Women and couples use this to stop being bombarded. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
How about the English can only mail the English, the Scottish other and the Welsh the welsh. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *sGivesWoodWoman
over a year ago
ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL |
"Another suggestion ...
If you have “Not looking for single men” on your profile then you shouldn’t be able message men! Filters should work both ways, not one way only! "
So we can't do our own searching? Harsh. You'll be suggesting all filters get removed next and that we should have to receive and respond to messages from lots of people we don't want to meet lol. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"Another suggestion ...
If you have “Not looking for single men” on your profile then you shouldn’t be able message men! Filters should work both ways, not one way only!
So we can't do our own searching? Harsh. You'll be suggesting all filters get removed next and that we should have to receive and respond to messages from lots of people we don't want to meet lol. "
Ways to get women to leave the site in droves... |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Dont like it? Then leave...simples.... |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Possibly a notification for new mail?? Just a thought |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Possibly a notification for new mail?? Just a thought "
You can have notifications sent to you email inbox |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
A lot of suggestions have been made on verifications and permissions over the years.
I'm not particularly favourable to this one. Largely as it takes most single men months to get established.
People probably have a legal right to delete their profile when they want to due to GDPR. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
The new video feature could work for sorting out genuine profiles.
A quick video of the profile user writing their username, Fab website address and the date, could deter the timewasters, pic collectors and so on.
The site could have video verification moderators dedicated to that one task. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
I posted the following in the forum not too long ago, didn't get much reaction. The admin closed the post.
What do everyone think.
Who agrees, that Fab should introduce a membership verification process where a picture of your passport or driving license should be included with the username picture you have to submit.
I'm sure this would stop 99% of the fake profiles on here.
Obviously Fab won't implement this sort thing, because all the site is interested in is money. Don't even improve the bugs an glitches it's full of.
Shame really because most on here are genuine people, but unfortunately it's being over run by boys and fakes |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By * Plus ECouple
over a year ago
The South |
"I posted the following in the forum not too long ago, didn't get much reaction. The admin closed the post.
What do everyone think.
Who agrees, that Fab should introduce a membership verification process where a picture of your passport or driving license should be included with the username picture you have to submit.
I'm sure this would stop 99% of the fake profiles on here.
Obviously Fab won't implement this sort thing, because all the site is interested in is money. Don't even improve the bugs an glitches it's full of.
Shame really because most on here are genuine people, but unfortunately it's being over run by boys and fakes"
We certainly wouldn't send in photos of our passports. I don't have one for a start.
Neither would we send in a photo of our driving license.
I'm not sure how the site is only interested in money, when it's free to join.
E |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *pmsldCouple
over a year ago
kettering |
While I agree that theres plenty of improvements that can be made to the site, however making more barriers to access the site isnt IMO a good suggestion. Why? Because the ease of access is what brings new members in, I'm willing to bet large numbers wouldnt have stayed for long if you enforced uploading sensitive information, or a paywall. Theres plenty of pay to use sites out there already so if thats the way you want it run then why not use them ? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"I posted the following in the forum not too long ago, didn't get much reaction. The admin closed the post.
What do everyone think.
Who agrees, that Fab should introduce a membership verification process where a picture of your passport or driving license should be included with the username picture you have to submit.
I'm sure this would stop 99% of the fake profiles on here.
Obviously Fab won't implement this sort thing, because all the site is interested in is money. Don't even improve the bugs an glitches it's full of.
Shame really because most on here are genuine people, but unfortunately it's being over run by boys and fakes"
No chance. That would not work.
Probably the reason your suggestion was closed down before. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
[Removed by poster at 20/10/20 20:26:24] |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
Admin clearly looked into your complaint and made a decision based on the information accessible to them.
Sounds like your pissed off, because a judgement call didn't go in your favour.
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
