FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Bareback search option
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why cant we have a bareback option on search ? Save all the time on searching then scrolling down and safe sex on there profile .. we have obviously left safe sex off our profile , but can’t search for people who are the same ..." this would be fantastic,great idea | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"As a bareback couple, we would find this option great " It would save alot of time.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Alot guys, that prefer bareback, lie and have safe sex on there profile so that they have more chance of getting laid, so you would lose alot of your target audience" Who me? Wouldn't care less if I lost them I block them anyway the obvious ones with pics of bareback with different women. They aren't my target I value my health over pleasures. Nothing worse than a liar. Lie about one thing what else would they lie about. Not my loss. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why cant we have a bareback option on search ? Save all the time on searching then scrolling down and safe sex on there profile .. we have obviously left safe sex off our profile , but can’t search for people who are the same ..." Agreed, would love to be able to search by those into the same, and whilst some would be upfront and put it as an interest, many unfortunately would not and make the search incomplete. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Alot guys, that prefer bareback, lie and have safe sex on there profile so that they have more chance of getting laid, so you would lose alot of your target audience Who me? Wouldn't care less if I lost them I block them anyway the obvious ones with pics of bareback with different women. They aren't my target I value my health over pleasures. Nothing worse than a liar. Lie about one thing what else would they lie about. Not my loss." Why would you think I meant you? It's aimed at whoever is coming on the thread thinking this search option is a good idea, is just letting people know, alot of search options people think would be a good idea, often aren't due to liars. I don't play bare either, hence knowing all about the liars | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"As a bareback couple, we would find this option great It would save alot of time...." Yes it would .love looking into a woman eyes as i slide my bare cock in her unprotected pussy fucking it and shooting my load in. Xx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Exactly and very annoying when paying for the membership, can’t have this option added ? " I second that bare back option works for both side the fence | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This site is, all things considered, really basic and out of date. That the admins make so much money for so little in terms of user experience is laughable..." It's easy to be a critic, the site works well for most people. I'm sure they would consider your proposals in between counting the takings. Sadly you haven't suggested anything constructive! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This site is, all things considered, really basic and out of date. That the admins make so much money for so little in terms of user experience is laughable... It's easy to be a critic, the site works well for most people. I'm sure they would consider your proposals in between counting the takings. Sadly you haven't suggested anything constructive! " Cool story. Because this is the first time this has been suggested as a quality of life improvement by users before Compare the user interface of this platform to any other major swinger website and you'll see how dated this is. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why cant we have a bareback option on search ? Save all the time on searching then scrolling down and safe sex on there profile .. we have obviously left safe sex off our profile , but can’t search for people who are the same ..." Do you get much stick for liking bareback | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"As a dirty gurl who likes a giy to use me, this option would be ideal!!! However I'm sure if you do not check the Safe Sex checkbox then it means you're looking for people who don't want it, and want bareback " Unchecked safe sex still means can't be searched for in interests. Which is what they want, bareback to be a searchable option. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why cant we have a bareback option on search ? Save all the time on searching then scrolling down and safe sex on there profile .. we have obviously left safe sex off our profile , but can’t search for people who are the same ..." Sites like this have a responsibility to promote good sexual health. Adding a bareback search function would go against that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Funny we mention in our profile bareback and still get messages from couple and others who don’t read it lol , why be so much easier to just block people with safe sex on profile " We have the same problem. Then they get the arse when we ask them if they bareback x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" It would be really great to be able avoid barebackers just as much as youd like to avoid us who want safer sex." Agreed | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people." Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers Thanks we will I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude?" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If you use the reply and quote function people will know if you are replying to them" Thank you oops x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude?" All that’s said , still be nice for us who do , to have the option and all you who don’t can block us , saves you time and us | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people." Yes most are and as I’ve said before people who run this also run fabguys and bb option on there ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We love dareback and have had checkups all good We would love the option to let everyone know we love and do bb We have been swinging for over 25 years and have never had one problem in all that time we have been to house party’s clubs etc swinging and still do it even at our mature age so come on contact us xx" Thank you and us at 51 and 50 still swinging lol , let’s hope fabswingers is watching this thread and as on fabguys as did check after someone mentioned it , does have the bb option ! Same owners I believe ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude?" Yet another boring rant | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude? Yet another boring rant" Luckily we won't see you rant when you catch herpes or HIV. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We would all like to see many changes, it's just a pity they never occur." Yes pity as not a lot of work for the admin to make this change | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why do some people have to hijack a post with such negativity? If its not for you just pass on by. Simple " That’s why having bb as a Option would work so well so people who don’t like it as above can be blocked simple | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"This is the feedback section, if you want to discuss the perils of BB can you go start another thread as the suggestion is getting lost totally" Thank you | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think this would be an excellent addition to the site." This | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). I check partners history before I go bareback as a safety rule for myself. " Nothing nicer that shooting a jet of your warm hot cum in to a warm moist pussy... . | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). I check partners history before I go bareback as a safety rule for myself. Nothing nicer that shooting a jet of your warm hot cum in to a warm moist pussy... . " And await the results.. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). I check partners history before I go bareback as a safety rule for myself. Nothing nicer that shooting a jet of your warm hot cum in to a warm moist pussy... . And await the results.. " I'm sterile to so I also got the security of no chance of pregnancy as a result | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). I check partners history before I go bareback as a safety rule for myself. Nothing nicer that shooting a jet of your warm hot cum in to a warm moist pussy... . And await the results.. I'm sterile to so I also got the security of no chance of pregnancy as a result" I forgot that absolves you from catching something serious | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). " That's fine, but it goes to show that without spelling it out, just ticking or not ticking safe sex doesn't get the whole story across. A bareback option would help. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude? Yet another boring rant" Not everyone who fucks bare is sensible. "Tested recently" by one guy turned out to be last January! FFS. There's no excuse, especially with online kits. How many get orally and anally tested too? A test result doesn't count if you've fucked bare in between getting tested and your results. Straight men are so dodgy! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I assumed it was not added as the site promoted safe sex and therefore did not want to undermine that. However, if it is a feature on another site they own I don't quite see why they don't add it here. It works both ways to allow those who want to engage and for those who want to avoid. It does not seem like a huge technical task to add a tick box filter. I assume in this day and age most barebackers would take prep. " Exactly if it’s on fabguys then why not on here unless the owners think they would lose people off the site ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I tick the safe sex box as I do use condoms but I also bareback. I tick it as an indication I get checked and I'm safe with proven history (I keep my results). That's fine, but it goes to show that without spelling it out, just ticking or not ticking safe sex doesn't get the whole story across. A bareback option would help." Yes it would as you could write it in your description but how many people really read them and don’t just scroll to the pictures and the options lol .. so having a tick say in both boxes will maybe get people reading profiles more as well | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Good sexual health is getting checked on a regular basis, so you can go bareback and still be sexually healthy.i am sure who ever does bareback are savvy people. Theres going bareback with people you trust then there's going bareback with random strangers I can't see why anyone would want to risk such a thing with people they know nothing about They could have just done 20 man gangbang on a woman everyone bareback can you imagine the risk of infection?? Or someone who bareback every meet and that person bareback every meet and the chances are someone along that line has something considering the rate of stds in this country. Imagine someone's just got back from holiday they had a bareback fling thinking oh they will be fine Then we end up with an epidemic of antibiotic resistant std.... Oh yeah that's already started. If I want bareback I'd be damned well sure they are std clear at least twice even 3 times and then exclusively only them. Just isn't worth the hassle Imagine you caught something how many people you'd have to inform and then how many people they'd have to inform. If you don't then you're cowards and risking infecting a whole community just by thinking you're safe because you get tested. Condoms aren't 100% but it's a huge reduction to approximately 2 to 5% chance of catching something to approximately 85% bareback with an infected person. I don't think in all these barebackers they've never caught an std the odds aren't in their favour. You're either incredibly lucky or you've caught something that will clear itself in time or its inactive or just plain don't bother getting tested. Or is it just everyone for themself? The it's youre own fault if you catch something you knew the risks, carry on regardless attitude? Yet another boring rant Not everyone who fucks bare is sensible. "Tested recently" by one guy turned out to be last January! FFS. There's no excuse, especially with online kits. How many get orally and anally tested too? A test result doesn't count if you've fucked bare in between getting tested and your results. Straight men are so dodgy! " Testing is important and also getting a group who you can trust , why we don’t meet lots of different people.. we’re not after lots just good people | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"No-one mention cancers, smears look for changes on cervix not uterus. However, the concentration of prostaglandin in seminal fluid is 1000 times higher than that normally found in these cells. Prostaglandin receptor molecules are present on the surface of the cells that make up cervical and uterine cancer tumours. The influx of prostaglandin delivered by semen enhances the normal level of signalling between cells. Just saying " Never knew that , but then would you ever have bareback sex if you wanted to lower your odds? Even with your own partner and how often would you need to be having sex bb to up the odds ? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"No-one mention cancers, smears look for changes on cervix not uterus. However, the concentration of prostaglandin in seminal fluid is 1000 times higher than that normally found in these cells. Prostaglandin receptor molecules are present on the surface of the cells that make up cervical and uterine cancer tumours. The influx of prostaglandin delivered by semen enhances the normal level of signalling between cells. Just saying Never knew that , but then would you ever have bareback sex if you wanted to lower your odds? Even with your own partner and how often would you need to be having sex bb to up the odds ?" We never bareback with others, save that for between us. I've had hysterectomy but still have smears etc. HPV increases risk to cancer aswell as HIV. Just don't think people weigh up the other risks, more to it than taking PREP. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Membership hardly breaks the bank. Of all the other swinging sites this is the best. Excellent value for what we pay. Fem here by the way " I fully agree xx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a ridiculously simple edit they can make to their database. It's literally a drop down menu for safe sex - with the options being always, sometimes, if required, and never. That's all it would take to make a genuine QoL update that clearly everyone wants for various reasons. It's time the admins actually listened to feedback and did something. Fuck knows we pay them enough to action such a simple and highly popular request." Hear hear dr feel good | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Alot guys, that prefer bareback, lie and have safe sex on there profile so that they have more chance of getting laid, so you would lose alot of your target audience Who me? Wouldn't care less if I lost them I block them anyway the obvious ones with pics of bareback with different women. They aren't my target I value my health over pleasures. Nothing worse than a liar. Lie about one thing what else would they lie about. Not my loss." Your right. I get messages from guys with straight and safe on their profile and they offer to cum in my ass. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"No-one mention cancers, smears look for changes on cervix not uterus. However, the concentration of prostaglandin in seminal fluid is 1000 times higher than that normally found in these cells. Prostaglandin receptor molecules are present on the surface of the cells that make up cervical and uterine cancer tumours. The influx of prostaglandin delivered by semen enhances the normal level of signalling between cells. Just saying Never knew that , but then would you ever have bareback sex if you wanted to lower your odds? Even with your own partner and how often would you need to be having sex bb to up the odds ? We never bareback with others, save that for between us. I've had hysterectomy but still have smears etc. HPV increases risk to cancer aswell as HIV. Just don't think people weigh up the other risks, more to it than taking PREP. " I was at a funeral for a young woman that had cervical cancer this year, it can be a silent killer, everyone just thinks you get cured very easily but that isn’t always the case And Hpv is a virus that’s carried so easily around so many people carry it, sharing body fluids with strangers is sheer madness you really need to look after yourself | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |