FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Age Filters

Age Filters

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

We have message filters set to ages between 25 and 60. Recently we have had quite a few messages from 18 and 19 year old guys. Are the message filters screwed up?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone


"We have message filters set to ages between 25 and 60. Recently we have had quite a few messages from 18 and 19 year old guys. Are the message filters screwed up?"

No. If you've mailed or winked at them before they can still mail you (even if you can't remember doing so!). If you block them directly, they will not be able to again.

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Have never mailed anyone of that age directly, and I can quite easily remember. In any case, two of them had only been members for a day or so! Their mail comes straight in, no bother!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone

If you let us know an example username we can check for you. Please let us know in this thread.

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I delete them as soon as I realise their age, but I've had two today, both new members, surely you mail logs will show them?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone


"I delete them as soon as I realise their age, but I've had two today, both new members, surely you mail logs will show them?"

If it happens again let us know username in this thread.

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Last one was a guy "Rhyes" aged 18

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone


"Last one was a guy "Rhyes" aged 18"

No such username?

http://www.fabswingers.com/profile/Rhyes

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone

We found a http://www.fabswingers.com/profile/Rhyes.p

Who you mailed on 2011-09-10. This is why he can mail you.

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

But if I mailed him, it must have been to say no.......I will not have instigated a conversation with an 18 year old. So how did his post get to me in the first place?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *j_markCouple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

Totteridge/Whetstone


"But if I mailed him, it must have been to say no.......I will not have instigated a conversation with an 18 year old. So how did his post get to me in the first place?"

You mailed him 9th Sept 2011, age filters went live on 27th Sept 2011.

As we say, the only reason filters are bypassed is if you have mailed the person before or if you have winked at them or if you are friends.

Admin x

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But if I mailed him, it must have been to say no.......I will not have instigated a conversation with an 18 year old. So how did his post get to me in the first place?

You mailed him 9th Sept 2011, age filters went live on 27th Sept 2011.

As we say, the only reason filters are bypassed is if you have mailed the person before or if you have winked at them or if you are friends.

Admin x"

my reason for not replying with no thanks to everyone. they can later get through filters when you set / change them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0