FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Stopping fake accounts
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. " It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have." It would still be in the FAB system though. I'm sure it could be stored securely, but it would need someone to manually verify them. Do you really want a complete stranger to have your home address (if you send in a photo driving licence?), real date of birth, place of birth etc? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have. It would still be in the FAB system though. I'm sure it could be stored securely, but it would need someone to manually verify them. Do you really want a complete stranger to have your home address (if you send in a photo driving licence?), real date of birth, place of birth etc?" Fab is well-established and I'd consider its admin people trustworthy. I had to supply proof of identity including home address to the swingers' club I'm a member of...where is the difference? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have." It would produce a mass exodus of people from the site. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have. It would produce a mass exodus of people from the site. " Only if made mandatory! I don't think that would be a good idea. But it could be done as a voluntary add-on, an additional optional layer of verification for those who wanted it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Rather than having to use official documents like passport or driving license (which I wouldn't do tbh) if only photo verified users could send emails that would surely eliminate a large number of the fake profiles on here." I've been reliably informed (everytime this subject comes up) that it is easy to fake pictures to get the photo verification tick. If that was mandatory, then there would be a mass exodus again. I'm not photo verified, but am meet verified. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Rather than having to use official documents like passport or driving license (which I wouldn't do tbh) if only photo verified users could send emails that would surely eliminate a large number of the fake profiles on here." I think the problem with that is, as the OP suggests, there are photos getting through as verified that have been faked... I appreciate not everybody would feel comfortable sending in copies of official ID but I know of at least one other swingers' site that does this on a voluntary basis, and some people would do so, I'm sure. I think it might help some single guys who are new or not well-verified demonstrate that they're genuine, to their benefit. In addition, it might help a little with one of the banes of this site - guys providing fake verifications to fake single girl or couple profiles to gain equally fake veris back to make themselves look good. Apart from anything else, the sheer quantity of some of these false veris on the single girl & couple profiles can make them look genuine unless you really follow the veri trail through carefully and closely. Anybody verified by official ID would be very stupid to give a fake veri as their actual identity would be known if the fakery came to light, so it might cut down on these shenanigans a little a least; in addition, when checking veris seeing whether any are from somebody who has confirmed their ID would then help in making a judgement about whether it's a genuine profile. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why don’t Fab delete profiles that don’t get photo verified ( say if they don’t get verified within 24 hours ) they are loads that have joined over a year some of them & not verified!!!" I'm not photo verified and I don't want to be. I got a meet without being photo verified. Why should my profile be deleted because I don't want to upload a photo (which can be faked?) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why don’t Fab delete profiles that don’t get photo verified ( say if they don’t get verified within 24 hours ) they are loads that have joined over a year some of them & not verified!!!" We have been on here a while and have a number of meet verifications. Why would we bother with photo verification now?? And as previously mentioned this can be faked! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"With the current GDPR laws Fab couldn't insist on uploading documents" Where does this idea about uploading documents come from?! Actually uploading copies of original documents onto the Fab website would, obviously, not be a good idea for many reasons. E-mailing them to Fab admin for verification purposes, to be seen solely by Fab admin, is a very different thing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"With the current GDPR laws Fab couldn't insist on uploading documents Where does this idea about uploading documents come from?! Actually uploading copies of original documents onto the Fab website would, obviously, not be a good idea for many reasons. E-mailing them to Fab admin for verification purposes, to be seen solely by Fab admin, is a very different thing." It's exactly the same. It's going onto the same server which could be hacked. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"With the current GDPR laws Fab couldn't insist on uploading documents Where does this idea about uploading documents come from?! Actually uploading copies of original documents onto the Fab website would, obviously, not be a good idea for many reasons. E-mailing them to Fab admin for verification purposes, to be seen solely by Fab admin, is a very different thing. It's exactly the same. It's going onto the same server which could be hacked." Ah - well, yes, electronically transferring copies of documents to Fab admin would involve uploading them. The point I was trying to make is that they wouldn't be uploaded onto the website, in the way that photos we choose to attach to our profile are. As a non-techie person I'd have said that's how the phrase 'upload' was generally understood, but I may be wrong about that and anyway should have expressed myself more clearly. Sorry about that. Apologies too about the point made about GDPR which looking at again I think I might have misunderstood. Yes, I think you're right, in as much as I think it would need explicit consent for the copy of the document, or personal info taken from it, to be kept at least beyond immediate processing needs (ie for verification) which you'd want for the kind of detection of fake verifying I was going on about. However, it would at least be perfectly possible to opt-in to consent for this to be the case when sending a document for verification. It's a good point though, I don't think it could be insisted upon and it does rather weaken my argument. Damn... As to hacking! Aaargh. I shall leave it others more qualified than I am to comment on how much of a risk that is... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Totally agree. Too easy to just sign up and all the accounts are the same. Cock loving cum sluts who look amazing but never actually meet. All new users should have to be pic verified within 24 hours or account suspended and the admin would know the IP address the user signed up from and can block it. Would rather have 10000 genuine members than 30000 time wasters etc. Better experience for everyone. Been harping on about this for years now and seems no interest from the site owners to take action which is a shame as the site was set up by genuine people to meet genuine people. Totally got lost along the way " I'm a genuine person, I've met people. I'm not photo verified. So why should I be forced to upload a picture? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Totally agree. Too easy to just sign up and all the accounts are the same. Cock loving cum sluts who look amazing but never actually meet. All new users should have to be pic verified within 24 hours or account suspended and the admin would know the IP address the user signed up from and can block it. Would rather have 10000 genuine members than 30000 time wasters etc. Better experience for everyone. Been harping on about this for years now and seems no interest from the site owners to take action which is a shame as the site was set up by genuine people to meet genuine people. Totally got lost along the way I'm a genuine person, I've met people. I'm not photo verified. That’s totaly fine. I think the original point was that it is too easy to open an account whereas getting photo verified within 24 hours saves a lot of people wasting time. I am sure you receive messages from people who have just signed up And are genuine etc but also you have probably had messages off people who really have no interest in meeting. You know the ones who all of a sudden after however long chatting that an hour before meeting them their kids get sent home from school etc So why should I be forced to upload a picture?" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Fake are easy to spot and are actually a minority use common sense when contacting people instead of moaning about it " *Some* fakes are easy to spot, indeed. Those will be the ones you've spotted | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I have also noticed that on some new profiles. Not all, that there is a link to report the profile. That’s being driven by something in the sites background such as a known IP address that has created multiple profiles previously and these are removed quickly " You can report all profiles as fakes, regardless of how long they have been on the site. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Totally agree. Too easy to just sign up and all the accounts are the same. Cock loving cum sluts who look amazing but never actually meet. All new users should have to be pic verified within 24 hours or account suspended and the admin would know the IP address the user signed up from and can block it. Would rather have 10000 genuine members than 30000 time wasters etc. Better experience for everyone. Been harping on about this for years now and seems no interest from the site owners to take action which is a shame as the site was set up by genuine people to meet genuine people. Totally got lost along the way I'm a genuine person, I've met people. I'm not photo verified. That’s totaly fine. I think the original point was that it is too easy to open an account whereas getting photo verified within 24 hours saves a lot of people wasting time. I am sure you receive messages from people who have just signed up And are genuine etc but also you have probably had messages off people who really have no interest in meeting. You know the ones who all of a sudden after however long chatting that an hour before meeting them their kids get sent home from school etc So why should I be forced to upload a picture?" But you are missing the point. It won't stop anything. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"They should just implement i.p bans, that way they cant access the site from their home" IP addys are dynamic, they change. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why don’t Fab delete profiles that don’t get photo verified ( say if they don’t get verified within 24 hours ) they are loads that have joined over a year some of them & not verified!!!" We didn’t get photo verified until after a few weeks of joining, looking around and deciding that we wanted to actively meet. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Admin have said before that they won't make PV compulsory for all. If you set your filters to not accept mails from unverified profiles the site will work for you how you want it to." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"They should just implement i.p bans, that way they cant access the site from their home" Wouldn't work at all, IP address can be masked with a VPN. Plus smartphones generate new IP addresses, turn off and on generates another IP address. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have." You have any idea how much paperwork that would create for a site that has no employees to handle it? Who do you think is going to process it all? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too " It doesn't | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"They should just implement i.p bans, that way they cant access the site from their home" Wouldn't work with dynamic IPs and VPNs | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have." It's not a good idea to ever share your ID on sites like these. Site could get hacked and your details published for the world to see. Human beings are very judgemental and struggle to understand how like minded people enjoy places like this and will have you down as some pervert or worse yet, sex offender. It is also why I am reluctant to send face pics to members on here who have it as a prerequisite for contacting them. You never know who is on the other side. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't " When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? " Seems obvious doesn't it..... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? Seems obvious doesn't it..... " Very much so. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? Seems obvious doesn't it..... Very much so. " Then why don't people get it? Maybe is should be written in the site FAQ's. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified " It doesn't have "compulsory" PV | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified It doesn't have "compulsory" PV" A friend of mine couldn't proceed with opening her account until she had sent in a PV pic. The system wouldn't let her proceed any further with completing her account by PV. If it's not compulsory by definition, it is by process. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? " Excellent post | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think some people don’t understand the intention behind the photo verification option. Its supposed to give a level of assurance that the person in the picture is the same gender as the person’s profile. What it’s not, is a cast iron guarantee that this process is 100% fool proof. Photo verifications can be and probably are faked. What they are not is a nailed on guarantee that the person is genuine, the profile is genuine, that they won’t waste your time, that they will find you attractive, that they will want to meet you or that they will fuck you. Enjoying the site is about using your common sense, regrettably a skill many seem to lack. I even saw someone a while back suggesting that a photo verification was a better barometer than a meet verification. That really did make me want to give my head a wobble. I think some people are in too much of a hurry to meet, too desperate, and in their haste they forget to carry out any due diligence. After which they want the site to remedy their mistakes by introducing a whole raft of unworkable and impractical processes. If any other form of verification system provided a 100% guarantee, don’t you think the site would have implemented it by now? Excellent post " Thank you. I've copied into my notes so I can copy and paste it into every one of these threads. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" If it's not compulsory by definition, it is by process." It doesn't have "compulsory" PV" for all ( added two words ) | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Why don’t Fab delete profiles that don’t get photo verified ( say if they don’t get verified within 24 hours ) they are loads that have joined over a year some of them & not verified!!!" You need verifying again by me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"They should just implement i.p bans, that way they cant access the site from their home" Something that anyone who can do a quick Google search could circumvent in seconds. Bout as useful as a chocolate fireguard. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame " Don’t name and shame, it’s against site rules | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Don’t name and shame, it’s against site rules " This. ^ | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame " Having more than one profile is allowed but not if you're using it to wind someone else up or trick them. Admin take a dim view of that. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Having more than one profile is allowed but not if you're using it to wind someone else up or trick them. Admin take a dim view of that." I think they’re saying that the bloke has a fake couples account? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Having more than one profile is allowed but not if you're using it to wind someone else up or trick them. Admin take a dim view of that. I think they’re saying that the bloke has a fake couples account?" Doh! You're right | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Having more than one profile is allowed but not if you're using it to wind someone else up or trick them. Admin take a dim view of that." Rewind. Report him, don't name and shame. Got the wrong end of the stick. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Simply ask for a live direct photo holding a random object of your choice I.e spoon if you suspect they are fake. If they are genuine and have experienced fake profiles themselves they will understand and gladly put you at ease and do your request " Exactly this The shoe on the head works well lol | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Don’t name and shame, it’s against site rules " will name and shame . Fab needs gen people not wasters | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Simply ask for a live direct photo holding a random object of your choice I.e spoon if you suspect they are fake. If they are genuine and have experienced fake profiles themselves they will understand and gladly put you at ease and do your request Exactly this The shoe on the head works well lol " Love this idea | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Don’t name and shame, it’s against site rules will name and shame . Fab needs gen people not wasters " You will then probably have your account suspended, but your call. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"We're having a great time winding up a sad pathetic single guy at the moment with a fake couples profile. But tomorrow shall name and shame Don’t name and shame, it’s against site rules will name and shame . Fab needs gen people not wasters You will then probably have your account suspended, but your call. " Wise words. Oddly enough the same advice offered by a forum moderator. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Simply ask for a live direct photo holding a random object of your choice I.e spoon if you suspect they are fake. If they are genuine and have experienced fake profiles themselves they will understand and gladly put you at ease and do your request Exactly this The shoe on the head works well lol " Ah a sensible comment at last! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Does everyone not have to get photo verified ? I know I did !! " no but it helps | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"unless there is a good response from a newbie that all makes sense we usually wait untill they have a veri off somone we know. so many couples have a veri off a single man .the so call 3 people are usually just the one saddo." There’s some blatant ones like that on here, I’ve reported a few but they never get taken down | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"unless there is a good response from a newbie that all makes sense we usually wait untill they have a veri off somone we know. so many couples have a veri off a single man .the so call 3 people are usually just the one saddo. There’s some blatant ones like that on here, I’ve reported a few but they never get taken down " Well I reported mine lol yesterday He is still there and we had an exchange of messages again on meets but still can't speak to them on the phone . | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified It doesn't have "compulsory" PV" Well I assure you, it took 2 days to verify my profile and no user could see it until then. When I would log in, I could only go to the upload a pic to verify page. I thought that’s how the admin controlled the daily new accounts being created and closed. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Something needs to be done about the all the fake accounts it’s flooding out the site and really ruining the experience. Users should have to verify their identity with ID, like image verification but can’t be faked with photoshop or anything like that. This will increase enjoyment for users imo" I've never come across a fake account yet | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified It doesn't have "compulsory" PV Well I assure you, it took 2 days to verify my profile and no user could see it until then. When I would log in, I could only go to the upload a pic to verify page. I thought that’s how the admin controlled the daily new accounts being created and closed. " If you read my next post is says "It doesn't have "compulsory" PV for all" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I think fabguys has compulsory photo verification before a new account is active - might be good to have that here too It doesn't When I recently had to recreate my accounts - it wouldn’t let me proceed until I had it photo verified It doesn't have "compulsory" PV Well I assure you, it took 2 days to verify my profile and no user could see it until then. When I would log in, I could only go to the upload a pic to verify page. I thought that’s how the admin controlled the daily new accounts being created and closed. If you read my next post is says "It doesn't have "compulsory" PV for all"" Thanks - I did read your comment - you have since amended by adding “for all”. I was explaining my experience which was not an illusion in my mind - perhaps it was a blip in the system - nevertheless it occurred and it formed an assumption that PV was compulsory for all - now I know it’s just “for some”. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Something needs to be done about the all the fake accounts it’s flooding out the site and really ruining the experience. Users should have to verify their identity with ID, like image verification but can’t be faked with photoshop or anything like that. This will increase enjoyment for users imo" If you've figured out who the fakes are you must have to know the site is flooding with them, why worry you've sussed them so shouldn't affect your experience. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"There’s no way on earth that we’d ever upload any form of official ID to this or any other site for that matter. It needn't be uploaded as such. A copy could be sent to admin, and it then be shown on the profile that it had been seen and was satisfactory, using something similiar to the green tick or green flag which we currently have. It would produce a mass exodus of people from the site. " I take it all those who feel it is somehow more secure to send personal documentation (even if only copies) directly to be verified by someone else (even if allegedly as reliable as Fab) have never heard of either burglary or insider-staff problems in the real world? With the advent of good quality cameras on phones copying your personal data is just a tap away. Many Fabbers value and guard their discretion to avoid conflict in their real lives. We agree with you 100% no way would we place such documentation out in the web or in the hands of any swinger site associated with the web. Just keep watching how often our elders and "betters" in Parliament for instance keep pushing for access to who is a member of these sites. Why do they want to know? Knowledge is power. As for the constant reappearance of this "sort out the fakes" thread it would appear that many such posters just want Fab to be a bigger version of a sex club with guaranteed meat (that is not a typo) on the menu. If they don't like Fab the way it is why are they here? Most of the old hands can spot a fake a mile off and just move on to the next conversation without wasting time. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"So many fake couple its becoming drowning. Or the male of couple doing all the messaging. Getting so boring " so true . Yet admin removed our status saying warning fake couple alert in Gloucester. It just pisses us off as the spoil the site for others | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Rather than having to use official documents like passport or driving license (which I wouldn't do tbh) if only photo verified users could send emails that would surely eliminate a large number of the fake profiles on here. I've been reliably informed (everytime this subject comes up) that it is easy to fake pictures to get the photo verification tick. If that was mandatory, then there would be a mass exodus again. I'm not photo verified, but am meet verified." Anything is easily faked. And yes a mass exodus would indeed happen; by the genuine fabbers. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"So many fake couple its becoming drowning. Or the male of couple doing all the messaging. Getting so boring so true . Yet admin removed our status saying warning fake couple alert in Gloucester. It just pisses us off as the spoil the site for others " Because you should report instead of name and shame | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |