Hi all,
I have set the following message filter settings:
- Can't be a couple (MM)
- Can't be A single male (M)
- Can't be TV/TS
The message filters work but my question is around the 'Looked @ Me' List.
Single Males do not appear on my 'Looked @ Me' List (which is fine) but MM Couples and TV/TS still do.
Is there any reason for this? Or am I looking in the wrong place?
Kind regards |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hi all,
I have set the following message filter settings:
- Can't be a couple (MM)
- Can't be A single male (M)
- Can't be TV/TS
The message filters work but my question is around the 'Looked @ Me' List.
Single Males do not appear on my 'Looked @ Me' List (which is fine) but MM Couples and TV/TS still do.
Is there any reason for this? Or am I looking in the wrong place?
Kind regards "
they must be looking in stealth mode as anyone can view your profile, you can only prevent folk sending messages, not looking |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *j_markCouple
over a year ago
Forum Mod Totteridge/Whetstone |
"
Is there any reason for this? "
A very, very long time ago, it was only possible to block single males. This was carried over to looked@me. Over time, sex blocks for all sex types were added. These were not moved over to looked@me. So in answer to your question, there is a reason but not a good one
Admin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Why worry about your look at me list? If they look and don't message, or can't message then it doesn't affect you.
Take it as a compliment that there is something in your profile worth looking at |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Probably it may have killed the site if guys had been able to block like the ladies could from viewing the eye candy.
Think of it as no different for charging more for single guys at clubs and a token for single ladies so as to get more ladies to go. If it was the same charge, fewer ladies would go and eventually less guys would go and so less revenue and unhappy couples. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Thanks all (and thanks to Admin for replying!)
I had an incling that the two features were linked - glad it wasn't anything more
P.S. I don't mind men/male couples/TVs viewing my profile at all. All are welcome as much as they like My query was just regarding the filter/looked @ me mis-match.
It'd be nice if it was altered, only simply because the non-message filtered ones are the only I profiles I am interested in... but it's not exactly a high priority or matters all that much |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Your joystick remains visible to all, irrespective of partner types and message filters. The key viewing restrictions you can make are upon non-members viewing you, ie accessible to the full public or not. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Your joystick remains visible to all, irrespective of partner types and message filters. The key viewing restrictions you can make are upon non-members viewing you, ie accessible to the full public or not. "
Cheers. I am already aware
I am not, nor was ever asking about restrictions on people viewing my profile. It is ONLY based on the member types that appear on 'Looked @ Me' & how they relate to message filters which the Admin has kindly explained above.
I know anyone can -view- me with my current settings but I'm not looking to change that, regardless. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic