 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi,
Could you define 'Verifications by meeting' more accurately please?
Split them between social & physical, to show actual physical activity rather than going for a drink.
Ally x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not for me, sorry. To me, a verification just confirms that someone turned up, on time, and smelled nice. It's no-one's business who I've had sex with, except MINE!"
Don’t display the individual verifications then, just the summary - surely the same applies at the moment regarding privacy for you and those that have verified you? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not for me, sorry. To me, a verification just confirms that someone turned up, on time, and smelled nice. It's no-one's business who I've had sex with, except MINE!"
I agree, it's not anyone's business what happens on a meet, just that they person is who they say they are |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Distinguishing between play and social verification will identify those who court attention, but with little inclination to play.
If the OP suggestion is implicated, it will give everyone a more informed option when choosing play partners...
You'll still have the option to display verifications individually or in summary.
Personally I'm all for it, but then I'm an avid back verifier  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Not for me, sorry. To me, a verification just confirms that someone turned up, on time, and smelled nice. It's no-one's business who I've had sex with, except MINE!
I agree, it's not anyone's business what happens on a meet, just that they person is who they say they are"
We also agree this is a poor idea as it's the poster who decides which category to put the verification in. So what happens if you go to a social and the 100 people there decided to verify that they had sex with you, which would still show on your summary if you didn't display it. If you want to display that you had sex then do it in the text. Just think how people would abuse it, for us it's a facepalm kind of suggestion, didn't think it through |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
As a listed single guy I would really like to be able to verify someone too, I do understand the reasons for it but there were some BRILLIANT shows last night but as I'm not verified I can't verify them.
I've messaged PM'd separately to let them know how good they were and always felt that I have to explain that I can't verify them as to how good it was and then it looks like I'm asking for the verification too (which I'm not)
Not just last night either but loads of cam shows I've watched, would be great to able to do that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
A verification showing someone had sex doesn't mean they will always have sex. Also, having social verifications only doesn't mean they won't have sex. People put too much emphasis on verifications other than that the person turned up and is the person on the profile. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not for me, sorry. To me, a verification just confirms that someone turned up, on time, and smelled nice. It's no-one's business who I've had sex with, except MINE!
I agree, it's not anyone's business what happens on a meet, just that they person is who they say they are"
Exactly.....you are verifying the person is who they say they are...that they are genuine. Not giving them a reference! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
