FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Vetting
Vetting
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade."
Really?
So, we would have our account suspended for 2 weeks just because we don't have a veri in the last 2 months?
Get a grip mun!
Baring in mind by your rules your profile should be suspended, I don't think you have thought this through at all lol! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
I think that it is a brutal but effective suggestion. It would force people to be verified and more active whilst help to cut down the single male population and other elements, like fakes. Escorts etc. It's not perfect but would overall improve FAB.
I did think it through. The fact that by that thinking I would be forced off doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Better to be forced off and improve FAB |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think that it is a brutal but effective suggestion. It would force people to be verified and more active whilst help to cut down the single male population and other elements, like fakes. Escorts etc. It's not perfect but would overall improve FAB.
I did think it through. The fact that by that thinking I would be forced off doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Better to be forced off and improve FAB"
Why not just use filters ? That works very effectively for us |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We have a group of people who we like to meet now and again, and feel no need to verify every time we meet.
To have to every time just so avoiding punishment wouldn't mean anything, and this site would come to a grinding halt. Like a lot of people, swinging is something we drop in and out of when it suits us. It doesn't drive our social life.
So although your intentions might be good. In practice it wouldn't work. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site."
All this would ever do is put off newbies from joining. Personally I have enough swing-related friends that would perpetually verify us without ever having to leave the house  or if that failed I'd stick my boobs on cam. You can't force people to fuck strangers more than they want to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lighty1Woman
over a year ago
You Dont Need to Know, right now |
I've taken a 6 month break, because of illness. But I still use the site daily, to keep in touch with my friends, and to evaluate potential new partners for when I'm well enough to meet again. By your suggested 'rule change', I would have been thrown off the site 4 and a half months ago, and I would be forced to make a new profile every six weeks, in order to keep up my contacts. All unnecessary additional admin for the site.
Anyone who doesn't want to engage with people who haven't been verified in the last six weeks, can just use their filters, and delete unwanted messages. No need to try to force other users to work 'your' way. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Op your talking bollocks I meet regular but not always get a verification and people you meet the d to leave site and they're verifications go with them .I regularly meet a lass who comes and goes from site and never verifies so by your ruling I would be barred for not securing a verification thus turning site into a chore and not a pleasure op give your head a bang as think u fell out of bed and banged it hard |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade."
Foxtrot Oscar !!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
We meet when we want too, when time and opportunity permits. As soon as you start forcing people into doing as you suggest you'll lose them. Besides this website is only a small part of the swinging lifestyle and much happens outside of Fab, it isn't all hand in hand.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think that it is a brutal but effective suggestion. It would force people to be verified and more active whilst help to cut down the single male population and other elements, like fakes. Escorts etc. It's not perfect but would overall improve FAB.
I did think it through. The fact that by that thinking I would be forced off doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Better to be forced off and improve FAB"
So Fab is only good if people meet very frequently ? I disagree. Fab works great for us but if the rules told us how often we should meet others then we, and most others, would simply use other sites more and this site would go downhill. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't really understand what you mean about the site providing verifications. On what basis? How? If it was automated it would be meaningless, if it needed input what sort of fees would cover the additional cost?
And deleting accounts with no/old veris would be daft. Not everyone gives veris, especially once you've met a group of people you repeat meet. Not verifying doesn't make you fake. Plus there are plenty of good reasons people take a step back for a while. This would penalise genuine members more than fakes. There are already filters to out the unverified. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade."
So you want people to be deleted if they've no recent meets. But also want fab to introduce an unspecified way of verifying people if tbey can't get a meet.
Am I missing something or is there a huge flaw in that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think that it is a brutal but effective suggestion. It would force people to be verified and more active whilst help to cut down the single male population and other elements, like fakes. Escorts etc. It's not perfect but would overall improve FAB.
I did think it through. The fact that by that thinking I would be forced off doesn't mean it's a bad idea. Better to be forced off and improve FAB"
you want to "force" people to meet even though potentially nobody has taken their fancy in a 2 month period? seriously..."force"? not a word i would wish to be associated with in a swinging context at all... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Im not sure this is the right idea
But i do think something needs to change on fab
Too many single guy profiles
Most of whom dont turn up or cancel when a meet is arranged
Makes using fab more tedious than fun |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You could also end up with unscrupulous people trading verifications for fags / booze / phone top ups etc. completely undermining the validity of the verification process. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Im not sure this is the right idea
But i do think something needs to change on fab
Too many single guy profiles
Most of whom dont turn up or cancel when a meet is arranged
Makes using fab more tedious than fun"
We like the single guy profiles. We only meet guys so its good to have plenty of choice 
Plus in over ten years of swinging iv only had 3 guys not turn up so the site works well for me and i think one of thos guys was from another site anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
All sites have fakes, jokers, timewasters, Muppets. But they all still have Genuine swingers. Couples, singles etc.
What bothers me is messages from a couple that's not a couple.
I'm like most men on here simply want another mans wife on my cock.
But my ex fab partner was good for couples |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Lots of time wasters and lots of them are verified I had offers of meets last night and when I replied to say yes they just deleted my message and they're the ones that did the chasing not me and today the excuses vary from I was d*unk too my phone was flat |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Verifications are just opinions and there's no way of ensuring they're geunine so why would we judge anyone by that method? Some of us don't want to meet every week or every month even. Some of us can't. Some of us are looking for longer term relationships and are prepared to take as long as it does to find the right person. Why should people like us be discriminated against in favour of what could easily turn into a clique of people verifying eachother? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We really do anything on fab! We have found the site to be full of wasters and dreamers but fab is really good for keeping in contact with events!
To be honest that is the main reason we are on here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
So we all want fab to improve.
But vari's could be fake !
People may not want to or be able to meet often !
We all want freedom of choice !
And we are all sick of dickhead single guys making couples profiles.
It comes down to filters
We would rather pay double or more for a fab that we can really make our own.
Filter single males by different age ranges to couples
Bi males males from straight
Single bi females by ...........as if any one filters those
But you get our meaning
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *yrdwomanWoman
over a year ago
Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum |
Why does everyone assume verifications are the only way to find out who is genuine on here? I've met non-verified men and had an excellent time. I've been stood up by verified men. Verifications help, but it is up to us to use all the tools (filters, age limits, common sense!) to arrange our meets, not the site.
This is a free site. If we pay, we're paying to support it, not for guarantees and hand holding. I don't expect anything from the site apart from a good time, and feeling that I MUST meet someone to keep my profile active would have me leaving tout bloody suite.
There's always someone posting about laying down the law on here, like it would make life easier for anyone but them! It certainly seems to be mainly men saying that there are too many men, thus suggesting that they are desperately thinking of ways to cut down the competition. Sorry, but if I won't meet you voluntarily, I'm certainly not meeting you at your say so. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why does everyone assume verifications are the only way to find out who is genuine on here? I've met non-verified men and had an excellent time. I've been stood up by verified men. Verifications help, but it is up to us to use all the tools (filters, age limits, common sense!) to arrange our meets, not the site.
This is a free site. If we pay, we're paying to support it, not for guarantees and hand holding. I don't expect anything from the site apart from a good time, and feeling that I MUST meet someone to keep my profile active would have me leaving tout bloody suite.
There's always someone posting about laying down the law on here, like it would make life easier for anyone but them! It certainly seems to be mainly men saying that there are too many men, thus suggesting that they are desperately thinking of ways to cut down the competition. Sorry, but if I won't meet you voluntarily, I'm certainly not meeting you at your say so."
 I agree if you can't get a meet u can't expect fab to whittle down your competitors op just to give u a better conversion rate |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
We find the best way to separate the wheat from the chaff is good old fashioned chatting over a reasonable period of time. We're hardly going to meet someone who can't be bothered to chat to us first and the time wasters/ losers soon either give up or reveal themselves. This method also has the benefit of putting off those who expect to exchange a few words/pics with complete strangers then have a shag. It works for us.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Why are there so many people on here who feel the need to dictate how others behave?
It's simple...really it is.... you enjoy fab your way and allow others to do likewise  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why are there so many people on here who feel the need to dictate how others behave?
It's simple...really it is.... you enjoy fab your way and allow others to do likewise "
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade.
Foxtrot Oscar !!!!"
you know that anit swearing in Welsh lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"A suggestion to improve the site. I suggest that all non couple profiles with no verification older than 6 weeks be deleted and a 2 week ban placed on the email. This would help cut out the single male population that sits idle and fake female profiles.As for couples I would give them 8 . This will force people into the community. This would overall improve the site.
A second point would be I would suggest that FAB itself creates a function so the site can provide verifications. As ignoring site issues with displaying, it can be very tricky and tiresome to get verifications and this comes from someone with meets and who is active in the community.
This is a serious suggestion for change. If change is not made FAB will continue to degrade."
Quite the opposite. I have a list I compare with a a few guys and we boycott people verified by people that will verify anything.
I don't post a verification until.ages after. If they bed someone else the same day and can't mention.it.in.pillow talk..
I don't contact anyone who is still.gagging to meet their previous meet. And dating diaries going back 15 shag...well get a life or switch your webcam.on.
Would you believe some one with 4765 verifications from the same person?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Op your talking bollocks I meet regular but not always get a verification and people you meet the d to leave site and they're verifications go with them .I regularly meet a lass who comes and goes from site and never verifies so by your ruling I would be barred for not securing a verification thus turning site into a chore and not a pleasure op give your head a bang as think u fell out of bed and banged it hard "
Refreshing. Meet your girl and cherish your whatever. Saving subtle "look.I got laid" diaries |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I 'Verify' my partner every time we meet, he doesn't display them, to us, they are a catalogue of our encounters and a progression of our relationship! I don't want all our intimate liaisons publicly available and nor would he..
Let's leave the FAB rules to the mods shall we?
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
