|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
im not referring to me meeting them etc, its for the information of other people. its about ensuring everyone enhances their experiences.. and i generally wouldnt refer to people as 'shit' either |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective"
As long as the reviewed person or couple have control over displaying the veri, a negative one will never appear, so a points system might be an improvement, but it would be open to abuse if someone bore grudge against the reviewed.
There needs to be acknowledgement on both sides that a meet has been agreed, then an objective review posted. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective
As long as the reviewed person or couple have control over displaying the veri, a negative one will never appear, so a points system might be an improvement, but it would be open to abuse if someone bore grudge against the reviewed.
There needs to be acknowledgement on both sides that a meet has been agreed, then an objective review posted."
yeah parameters would need to be drawn up to make it fair etc but the verification system is flawed at the minute |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective"
Someone suggested it a couple of months back...but as I said then I meet at home only, I would never give a negative review in case they caused problems. The last OP suggested waiting a week before posting reviews for anonymity...but in my experience single guys (my meeting preference ) often aren't meeting for longer periods than a week, so they'd know who gave them a review.
I personally don't display verifications or give them often. I don't hold much stock in them. I do appreciate you are trying to suggest something helpful though... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective
As long as the reviewed person or couple have control over displaying the veri, a negative one will never appear, so a points system might be an improvement, but it would be open to abuse if someone bore grudge against the reviewed.
There needs to be acknowledgement on both sides that a meet has been agreed, then an objective review posted.
yeah parameters would need to be drawn up to make it fair etc but the verification system is flawed at the minute"
In what way is it flawed? Someone proffers a verification and the recipient can decide whether to show it? What is flawed about that?
I have no wish to be rated according to a set of predefined factors. And what may turn me on may not be someone else's cup of tea - and vice versa. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"im not referring to me meeting them etc, its for the information of other people. its about ensuring everyone enhances their experiences.. and i generally wouldnt refer to people as 'shit' either"
Someones shit meet is a great meet for others |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
The veri system is there to show that the male profile you are interested in is actually run by a man. The womans profile is actually a woman. MF couple..... you get my drift.
It isn't a guarentee that she will actually give you the best blow job ever and fucks like a porn star, no matter what it says on her veris.
It is to show that the right gender is behind the profile not that they will show up, fuck you senseless and leave you with a smile on your face. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *lighty1Woman
over a year ago
You Dont Need to Know, right now |
"... Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay...."
Because with ebay, you know what you've ordered and what timescales you expect it to delivered in. You can therefore be objective in reviewing whether your expectations were met. With sex, no-one "orders" anything. You may HOPE to get oral, vaginal and anal sex, but I'm not a menu that you can order off. The meet will develop in whatever way seems right and natural at the time. Because of potential mismatched desires, no-one can be objective when reviewing a meet. Any such ebay-type review system would lead to unwarranted negative reviews ("she wouldn't give me oral, the bitch") and counter-reviews (his breath smelt"). Leave the verification system as it is - it's only meant to show that the person turned up and was the gender shown on the profile. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"What's wrong the way things are for verification purposes?
Perhaps the op would like additional scoring system over and beyond actual verification."
this |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What's wrong the way things are for verification purposes?
Perhaps the op would like additional scoring system over and beyond actual verification.
this "
So what exactly would you want to score?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What's wrong the way things are for verification purposes?
Perhaps the op would like additional scoring system over and beyond actual verification.
this
So what exactly would you want to score?
"
Sitting back in the deck chair...sipping a pimms. ...so refreshing it is... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So what exactly would you want to score?
"
Amount of in/outs, licks, kisses, teeth count how long each activity lasts and so on...
Hmmm maybe we could do auctions like ebay also |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Verifications are great but when do you ever see a negative verification or even a neutral one.. Why not have a similar scoring system to ebay. Lets be honest not every meet is a success but thats not to say its bad either. so a score might be more reflective"
I had a meet where I would not recommend other lady's to meet him, I did not verify or go back. Negative verifications would be open to abuse XXX |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic