 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
So I don't want this to sound like a moan. The categories by which one defines or acknowledges accepted stereotypes for classification is too broad. I have several TS/TG friends but they are frustrated by the way fab classes them. For example its insulting to lump in Transsexual, Trans Gender women with Cross Dressers they have normally spent all their life battling stereotypes and most definitely are not men who just wear knickers. Please can we show respect and expand the categorisation for everyone... Men, Women etc.... Thanks not here to spark a debate but do want to make admin aware that members do deserve the right to call themselves and define themselves in an accurate fashion. Randy   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Your missing the point of the post. I'm not saying all cross dressers are men wearing panties... Merely an example. What I am saying the classification within the gender groups is inherently flawed and Fab owners clearly need an update in discrimination and diversity Refresher courses. Come on fab admin be innovative and offer more personalisation rather than following the pack like other sites.... Its 2016 not 1975 ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
