FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Is fab webmaster too strict with runchy or explicit pictures

Is fab webmaster too strict with runchy or explicit pictures

By *ieutenant OP Man over a year ago

london

A lot of people are not happy with the heavy handed restrictions regarding runchy or explicit pictures. Remember we are mature people here.

If pictures don't involve minor or poo and rituals. I see no reason for the censorship. What do you think?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *rightonsteveMan over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

Rituals?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

We've got no problem with the rules but there again we are not here to look at explicit pics, we are here to meet like minded adults

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Its not a porn site so Im cool with it.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"Rituals? "

My eyes perked up at that one. Fancy some third degree shenanigans?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us! "

Fisting pics are verboten, as are wee and poo pics.

There are many, many, MANY websites out there for explicit pics, both posting and viewing. This is a swinger site.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

Ive got Fox tail butt plug..I had a photo of this rejected because "It contained animals"

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ouple in LancashireCouple over a year ago

in Lancashire

"A lot of people are not happy with the heavy handed restrictions regarding runchy or explicit pictures. Remember we are mature people here.

If pictures don't involve minor or poo and rituals. I see no reason for the censorship. What do you think?"

I think if you think that 'we are mature here' then you need to think again perhaps..

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us!

Fisting pics are verboten, as are wee and poo pics.

There are many, many, MANY websites out there for explicit pics, both posting and viewing. This is a swinger site."

Still surprised us! Oral is allowed, fucking too. Is anal? Don't know. Didn't think fisting would be viewed as too extreme. Have seen plenty with people tied, gagged etc. Don't see any of it being too extreme or different to the other

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Ive got Fox tail butt plug..I had a photo of this rejected because "It contained animals""

Im laughing!

Did the pic mod really think you had shoved a whole fox up your bum?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *rightonsteveMan over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"Rituals?

My eyes perked up at that one. Fancy some third degree shenanigans?

Me and you, chalked pentagram, candles at the ready

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us!

Fisting pics are verboten, as are wee and poo pics.

There are many, many, MANY websites out there for explicit pics, both posting and viewing. This is a swinger site.

Lines got to be drawn somewhere.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"Rituals?

My eyes perked up at that one. Fancy some third degree shenanigans?

Me and you, chalked pentagram, candles at the ready

I'm on the next train down

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *rightonsteveMan over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"Rituals?

My eyes perked up at that one. Fancy some third degree shenanigans?

Me and you, chalked pentagram, candles at the ready

I'm on the next train down

Hhhoooowwllllll *insert howlin' wolf emoticon*

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *bi HaiveMan over a year ago
Forum Mod

Cheeseville, Somerset

"Ive got Fox tail butt plug..I had a photo of this rejected because "It contained animals"

Im laughing!

Did the pic mod really think you had shoved a whole fox up your bum?

I doubt she'd fit!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"Ive got Fox tail butt plug..I had a photo of this rejected because "It contained animals"

Im laughing!

Did the pic mod really think you had shoved a whole fox up your bum?

I doubt she'd fit!

Oooops! sorry Fox

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us!

Fisting pics are verboten, as are wee and poo pics.

There are many, many, MANY websites out there for explicit pics, both posting and viewing. This is a swinger site.

Lines got to be drawn somewhere."

Obviously. Why fisting though? The picture in question looked little different to conventional fucking, to be honest. Funnily enough, I saw on another profile a few days later a fisting picture! Depends who approves pics, I suppose, as to what gets approved

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us!

Fisting pics are verboten, as are wee and poo pics.

There are many, many, MANY websites out there for explicit pics, both posting and viewing. This is a swinger site.

Lines got to be drawn somewhere.

Yep. They eventually catch up with ones that are not allowed though.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

If your allowed water sports as an interest. Why can't you post pics???

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"A lot of people are not happy with the heavy handed restrictions regarding runchy or explicit pictures. Remember we are mature people here.

If pictures don't involve minor or poo and rituals. I see no reason for the censorship. What do you think?"

How do you know a lot of people are not happy?

Personally I can only think of one friend that's ever commented about getting a picture rejected and then it was more surprise than annoyance.

I'm on here to meet people, I'm not overly interested in explicit pictures of any nature. I use porn sites for that

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *rightonsteveMan over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I'm sure I've seen a floating turd in a toilet in the back ground of some dudes cock pic!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I think theres a law regarding fisting,its about it being potentially harmful and a violent act

Pics will get through,I think sheer volume of pics being uploaded means that some get through the net

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

that said I'm still annoyed that the one of me naked outside Buckingham Palace got rejected...

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"that said I'm still annoyed that the one of me naked outside Buckingham Palace got rejected...

Try it again!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *rightonsteveMan over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

"that said I'm still annoyed that the one of me naked outside Buckingham Palace got rejected...

Bear Skins are only allowed on the guards heads....

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *yrdwomanWoman over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

"that said I'm still annoyed that the one of me naked outside Buckingham Palace got rejected...

You need to blur out the faces of Her Maj and Philip.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *jandjbCouple over a year ago

Nr Manchester

"A lot of people are not happy with the heavy handed restrictions regarding runchy or explicit pictures. Remember we are mature people here.

If pictures don't involve minor or poo and rituals. I see no reason for the censorship. What do you think?

How do you know a lot of people are not happy?

Personally I can only think of one friend that's ever commented about getting a picture rejected and then it was more surprise than annoyance.

I'm on here to meet people, I'm not overly interested in explicit pictures of any nature. I use porn sites for that"

Agree with this except we haven't bothered with porn since we started swinging.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"We had a fisting one rejected a few weeks back, for being too rude, which surprised us! "

Fisting images are considered illegal under the Obscene Publications Act so fab won't allow them to be shown on the site.

crystal

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ezebelWoman over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest

The pic rules for this site are here - http://www.fabswingers.com/articles/photo-rules

If a pic follows these rules it should be approved no problem.

Sometimes pics that shouldnt have been approved do slip through the net but if they are reported by someone Admin will review them and take them off.

Fisting pics and pee pics arent allowed. Admin have posted about this on threads before...

'We're advised it could be classed as extreme pornography and the poster (and possibly us) could be prosecuted. Why take the risk?

There are probably loads of places that accept these pics and worse. Fabs isn't one of them, sorry

Admin x'

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)