FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > fakes fakes fakes

fakes fakes fakes

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

So you see the profile. You either work out its not real or you dont. Now people must agree that its a problem. So a debate on how to stop it please. I suggest this (and I have many more). After a week you MUST photo verify yourself. Not difficult at all. Come on fab tidy this part of the site up. I know you must be in a position as you make good money from upgrades and this may affect that revenue stream. But I am sure you could take a stance. What do we all think? healthy debate please.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I have over 40 "in person" verifications. Why the hell should I be forced to photo verify myself?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Nice friendly debate?

You may have.

What about the ones that dont show. Are by cam. Are single males when the person doesnt meet them. The pperson verifying is hidden and so on.....

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm verified and genuine but I don't feel comfortable photo verifying my account for a couple of reasons - primarily because it's an absolute bitch to get photos off my phone onto here and I also worry about the privacy aspect.

Having been looking for a bi fem to play with for some time and ending up with countless blokes posing as fems, I totally get the frustration and don't know what the answer is but I don't think photo verification would work anyway - who's to stop someone submitting a photo of their sister/colleague/friend...

Then of course there are those that don't have any intention of actually meeting which is a whole other ball game...

I share your frustrations my friend!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Nice friendly debate?

You may have.

What about the ones that dont show. Are by cam. Are single males when the person doesnt meet them. The pperson verifying is hidden and so on....."

Not quite sure of your point. However if 40 odd different people, whatever their sex, have met you in person and verified you, most people would start to suspect your reality. But anyone could self verify with a fake photo (it's really easy in photoshop). Why would that be more reliable?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

There are pitfalls yes. But the fakes are beginning to take over the site. Many people mention this and something has to be done. Fab are quick to take your monthly fiver. So maybe they should Act on this problem as quickly as they take the cash.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Yes fair points. Its harder to create and verify a fake profile with a pic verification surely?


"I'm verified and genuine but I don't feel comfortable photo verifying my account for a couple of reasons - primarily because it's an absolute bitch to get photos off my phone onto here and I also worry about the privacy aspect.

Having been looking for a bi fem to play with for some time and ending up with countless blokes posing as fems, I totally get the frustration and don't know what the answer is but I don't think photo verification would work anyway - who's to stop someone submitting a photo of their sister/colleague/friend...

Then of course there are those that don't have any intention of actually meeting which is a whole other ball game...

I share your frustrations my friend!"

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Photo verifications DO NOT prove anything. Nor does meet in person or cam verification, they can all be faked!

Nor does making people pay a subscription fee to access the site, which has also been mentioned in the past.

The site has measures and features to "help" you use it how you wish, and at the end of the day, it boils down to you to use it as you wish, and use your common sense.

Admin have commented many times about this - if they choose to comment on this their answer will be the same as it always has been.

Many people like us, do not get any issues with fakes or timewasters are we are picky who we choose to message and meet.

If you are getting problems with fakers perhaps you should look at your own selection processes, rather than blaming the site.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Admin have said they have no plans to make PV compulsory.

If you use your filters you can block non PV'd people from contacting you so the site will work for you how you want it to.

http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"There are pitfalls yes. But the fakes are beginning to take over the site. Many people mention this and something has to be done. Fab are quick to take your monthly fiver. So maybe they should Act on this problem as quickly as they take the cash."

Paying for SS isn't compulsory. Admin don't force you to pay.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If you can splice one persons head on anothers body using Photoshop, which has been done many many times, why would it be harder while holding a piece of paper with writing on it?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If you can splice one persons head on anothers body using Photoshop, which has been done many many times, why would it be harder while holding a piece of paper with writing on it?"

You dont even need a face pic for a verification pic anyway.. it prooves nothing.

However it "may" help you get started, which is why we did it.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

0.0156

0