I think the current options are fine.
If more photo options ie site supporters only were introduced then it would make sense to only allow site supporters to view profiles and it would spiral.
Im not interested in excluding groups of people nor penalising people that can't afford to site support.
This site is free. Its photo privacy options are fine  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just because they are site supporters or validated it doesn't mean pics are any safer to being used/taken without your permission.
Just because people donate or they are classed as validated, doesn't mean they are truly genuine either.
So cant see the full logic behind this..
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
.