FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Photo verification on joining

Photo verification on joining

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Photo verification is a good way for us to filter out new "genuine" profiles. Or profiles with only one verification (We've noticed this with a lot of single female profiles lately)

It's so simple to do and I'm aware that nothing is flawless however, surely if photo verifying was a compulsory step in joining the site, it would help reduce the number of fake profiles????

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I always wondered why people don't get photo verified

Even people who are verified by others, don't always photo verify themselves

It takes 2 minutes to do

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yeah I like photo verification option. Dont think it should be compulsory though. But if a chivk is photo verified, at least I know its not a bloke pretending to be a woman.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *rightonsteveMan  over a year ago

Brighton - even Hove!

I don't think I noticed the photo self verify thing until I'd already got a real veri from a couple so I didn't bother. No green flag, which is a pity if I break down.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

plenty on here have managed without it, using the features already mixed with some early detections its easy to find the fakes

and if in doubt, webcam/telephone if it means that much, if they dont go for it...och well...it was only a shag

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *ezebelWoman  over a year ago

North of The Wall - youll need your vest

Moving this to site feedback

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0156

0