I think fab need to consider that not letting unpaid members see message threads just makes the place shitter for paid members. If I’m talking to someone and they can’t see what we’ve said to each other then they’re often able to keep track of the conversation, particularly if it takes place over a number of days.
I find myself getting pissed off at people and then realising they can’t see what’s been said.
Granted some are just shit at conversation. But others seem to genuinely not know they’re being shit.
Feels like fab are sacrificing the user experience of paid members for little gain. Threads are standard now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"An easy solution for you is to filter out non site supporters using your message filters. That way they wouldn't be able to contact you"
I don’t think whether or not someone pays to be here is an indication of how genuine they are. Some people may not have the money or just wanna see if it’s worth being here before paying |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"An easy solution for you is to filter out non site supporters using your message filters. That way they wouldn't be able to contact you
I don’t think whether or not someone pays to be here is an indication of how genuine they are. Some people may not have the money or just wanna see if it’s worth being here before paying"
Ah ok. I understand.
Well I moved this to the correct section for admin to see  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *orny-DJMan
over a year ago
Leigh-on-Sea |
So what you are suggesting is that non-site supporters be given one of the added features that those of us who do support the site are paying for, thereby reducing incentive and devaluing the site supporter model.
There have been times in the past when I haven't renewed and taken the view of seeing how I can manage as a non-supporter and then finding myself caving after a few days because I value the extra features.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"So what you are suggesting is that non-site supporters be given one of the added features that those of us who do support the site are paying for, thereby reducing incentive and devaluing the site supporter model.
There have been times in the past when I haven't renewed and taken the view of seeing how I can manage as a non-supporter and then finding myself caving after a few days because I value the extra features.
"
What I’m suggesting would benefit everyone. Who wants to have a conversation where the other person can’t see it’s contents a message later? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
There's a lot of things site supporters can't do, I don't think giving access to the full.message trail would de-incentivise anyone not to join. If they really think it is a big reason people become paid up members then take away another function instead, like non site supporters not being access or add profiles to the Hotlist |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"An easy solution for you is to filter out non site supporters using your message filters. That way they wouldn't be able to contact you
I don’t think whether or not someone pays to be here is an indication of how genuine they are. Some people may not have the money or just wanna see if it’s worth being here before paying"
its only a fiver. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *host63Man
over a year ago
Bedfont Feltham |
O have not renewed my site reporter status be because gains me nothing more than a site reporter.
All I can't do is see kids on hot pics pages or see who looked at me.
So what? Just because someone looks at me don't mean they will contact me.
Making ut any harder for non supporters to contact or restriction will just turn it into another pay site I would leave fab if that happens there are better paybsitrs out there if that become the case |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes I agree with you on this , but I think anyone on the site should be photo verified to be able to use the site , it costs nothing , so why wouldn't you want to be verified in this way , to me this is more important than veries from meets . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"Yes I agree with you on this , but I think anyone on the site should be photo verified to be able to use the site , it costs nothing , so why wouldn't you want to be verified in this way , to me this is more important than veries from meets ."
Totally agree with this for the right reasons and further assistance should there be a need for
Whilst some say they don't because of career it would be only to the site which is secure |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
