"Is this ever going to get fixed? We have filter on to not allow messages from people with no public pics, yet it seems to do nothing at all. It can't be *that* hard to mend?"
How can it be fixed? They add a public pic long enough to send the message and then remove it again. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *harAndBry OP Couple
over a year ago
Peterborough / Stamford |
"Is this ever going to get fixed? We have filter on to not allow messages from people with no public pics, yet it seems to do nothing at all. It can't be *that* hard to mend?
How can it be fixed? They add a public pic long enough to send the message and then remove it again. "
Then any messages sent (that are unread) are automatically bounced back to the sender when they suddenly don't meet the filter criteria.
(Bry) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is this ever going to get fixed? We have filter on to not allow messages from people with no public pics, yet it seems to do nothing at all. It can't be *that* hard to mend?
How can it be fixed? They add a public pic long enough to send the message and then remove it again.
Then any messages sent (that are unread) are automatically bounced back to the sender when they suddenly don't meet the filter criteria.
(Bry)"
That's a fantastic idea! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Is this ever going to get fixed? We have filter on to not allow messages from people with no public pics, yet it seems to do nothing at all. It can't be *that* hard to mend?
How can it be fixed? They add a public pic long enough to send the message and then remove it again.
Then any messages sent (that are unread) are automatically bounced back to the sender when they suddenly don't meet the filter criteria.
(Bry)"
. Good idea, as ever!
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic