"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it."
Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work.
Might as well not have that privacy setting.
Winston
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *s.KerryTV/TS
over a year ago
Blackpool |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it.
Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work.
Might as well not have that privacy setting.
Winston
"
It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private'  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"There is ,but sadly people can get round it by adding a pic and then deleting it.
Apparently if they have no public puc, but a pic set to private, the no public puc filter doesn't work.
Might as well not have that privacy setting.
Winston
It does work in a fashion. What people do is just set the picture to 'public' to be able to message you then after they have done so set it back to 'private' "
They do that too. But what I said is also correct, its been tested between our profile and someone else's.
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does anyone else wish there was a message filter for profiles with no profile picture? Or not pictures at all for that matter. "
Guess it's so easy to get around that filter. Might be quite a lot of effort to fix it. Is it really worth having? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
