FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Suggestions - long list (from a single man)
Suggestions - long list (from a single man)
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew  I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
" below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
"
How is this fair for all if women and couples aren't charged £100 ?
£1200 a year would mean only wealthy men could join. Also not fair for all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
1) excuse me, what? 
2) why only mandatory for women/couples? There are thousands of fake male profiles on here too.
3) this is already a thing - tick the "I'm what they're looking for" box when you search.
4) read their bio or ask them maybe idk just a suggestion.
5) also already a thing; maybe you need to manually switch over to the new style inbox.
6) if you block profiles you're not interested in they won't show up anymore.
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
It does, I wont pay anymore because there is no deterrent to timewasters. they could cut down on the amount of free messages for a start like other sites do. I'd agree with a photo verification compulsory at registration though
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
1) Have a laugh
3) Needs to be done
6) Also needs to be added
Not fussed about the rest |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ilk_TreMan
over a year ago
Wherever the party is! |
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
Hi there!
You must be new here... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
When you say "if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place" do you mean "if half of these suggestions get implemented i'll stand more chance of getting laid"
Would you really pay £100 a month membership to Fab?
Winston
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eyeYCouple
over a year ago
Nr Leicester |
Plenty of exclusive site's where money buy's more success mate..
Are you really suggesting £1200 pa?! Or £100 pa? We'd agree with increasing what we pay to out some of the fake profiles and general improvements.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
For a user of this site for well over 6 years have experienced the site found that the fees for site supporter are very reasonable as they are increasing the fees as you've mentioned isn't a great business strategy either  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
How about, all users pay £100 minimum to use the site, and that is credited to your account, and is valid for 12 months.
Then each initial message you send is charged 50p from your credit.
Replies after first message thereafter are free.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"How about, all users pay £100 minimum to use the site, and that is credited to your account, and is valid for 12 months.
Then each initial message you send is charged 50p from your credit.
Replies after first message thereafter are free.
"
How about we leave things as they are never try to fix something that isn't broken |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How about, all users pay £100 minimum to use the site, and that is credited to your account, and is valid for 12 months.
Then each initial message you send is charged 50p from your credit.
Replies after first message thereafter are free.
How about we leave things as they are never try to fix something that isn't broken "
Winston |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How about, all users pay £100 minimum to use the site, and that is credited to your account, and is valid for 12 months.
Then each initial message you send is charged 50p from your credit.
Replies after first message thereafter are free.
How about we leave things as they are never try to fix something that isn't broken
Winston "
Yeah, I too subscribe to that logic most of the time.
I just think an upfront fee might help to deter the ever increasing number of fake profiles on here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
1 of fabs strengths is that it's free of charge. This seems a core part of the owners strategy. It gives us all more choice of people to pick from. Paying for more features is optional and isn't to prove that we're real. Anyone determined to fake will be keen to work around restrictions anyway.
Having more profile interests that are searchable, such as couples playing alone etc, is a good idea. All profile criteria should be searchable.
If a man struggles here, it's better to improve the profile, tactics used to find / meet and to visit clubs. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"1 of fabs strengths is that it's free of charge. This seems a core part of the owners strategy. It gives us all more choice of people to pick from. Paying for more features is optional and isn't to prove that we're real. Anyone determined to fake will be keen to work around restrictions anyway.
Having more profile interests that are searchable, such as couples playing alone etc, is a good idea. All profile criteria should be searchable.
If a man struggles here, it's better to improve the profile, tactics used to find / meet and to visit clubs. "
Totally agree as money paying for site supporter has nothing to do with it people are successful without as well,it's more about effort and how much that user puts input  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How about, all users pay £100 minimum to use the site, and that is credited to your account, and is valid for 12 months.
Then each initial message you send is charged 50p from your credit.
Replies after first message thereafter are free.
How about we leave things as they are never try to fix something that isn't broken
Winston
Yeah, I too subscribe to that logic most of the time.
I just think an upfront fee might help to deter the ever increasing number of fake profiles on here"
I subscribe to the theory more people should get their heads around what swinging is, be in less of a rush to get their genitals moist, carry out due diligence, take more time to build trust and common interests and no be so desperate about getting verified.
I've been here years and am yet to be troubled by a timewaster, similarly on our couples profile.
If people adopted these habits their time on Fab would be much more pleasurable.
People waste their own time messaging us, that's easily ignored and is no big deal.
Would we pay £1,200 a year? Hell no.
Would we put £100 "in the bank" towards future messaging in order to join? Hell no.
I've been a member of sites that cost £35+ a month to join. Those sites have far more fake profiles and time wasters than Fab ever has.
Winston
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
"
Who are the one's that shouldn't be here? Charging £100 per month would pretty much ensure that only the most desperate guys are left |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Definitely new, op do some research and you’ll find that this has been talked to death for many years. You’re missing the point of this site and don’t seem to realise the more fees you charge the more fakes there will be. If you chatting to or meeting fake profiles that down to you, they are easy enough to avoid. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *w5kerriTV/TS
over a year ago
SIN BIN CITY |
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
I'm not saying you're a rampant narcissist or anything but this list has a distinct air of rampant narcissism about it :-/ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
So OP you just proved quite how much of a newbie you are 
Fas is what it is. Those of us smart enough to know how to use it do not need such white knighting changes.
Brownie points for disguising a "single men ruin it for the rest of us" post though |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Uh, surely no2 is de facto implemented anyway.
Anyone who doesnt want to put a face pic up or include one in the first message isnt going to get a reply. Men bitch about it here all the time and nobody has the slightest bit of sympathy.
De facto, photo verification is pretty much mandatory! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place.
1) excuse me, what?
2) why only mandatory for women/couples? There are thousands of fake male profiles on here too.
3) this is already a thing - tick the "I'm what they're looking for" box when you search.
4) read their bio or ask them maybe idk just a suggestion.
5) also already a thing; maybe you need to manually switch over to the new style inbox.
6) if you block profiles you're not interested in they won't show up anymore.
"
3) not to mention the part at the bottom of the search which excludes “any one not looking for single guys” |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
The site works fine as it is.
Did you join thinking you would instantly get your hole?
I don't see how penalising a certain demographic will increase your chances. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hey,
If anybody reads this, after a few months on here, below are my suggestions to make this place great and fair for all.
1) Increase monthly membership fee for single men, from current pathetic few pounds to say £100. This will block all those who shouldn't be here.
2) Introduce mandatory photo verification with face, for all Women / Couples
3) In search, do not show profiles of people who do not seek what you seek. I.e. do not show couples who do not seek single men. I know it's supposed to work but it doesn't in reality.
4) Allow couples to specify if wife available on her own, and make this searchable.
5) (Dramatically) improve messaging so that all messages with the same account are always in the same thread.
6) While browsing search results, allow for 'hide profile' function so that one can hide any profile they don't want to see in search results any more.
Phew I'm sure if half of these suggestions get implemented, this is going to be a much more steamy place."
Says the pissed off guy with no verifications |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *adyJayneWoman
over a year ago
Burnleyish (She/They) |
"Uh, surely no2 is de facto implemented anyway.
Anyone who doesnt want to put a face pic up or include one in the first message isnt going to get a reply. Men bitch about it here all the time and nobody has the slightest bit of sympathy.
De facto, photo verification is pretty much mandatory!"
I get plenty of replies and meets... And I don't share face pictures at all... Not even once we'd agreed to meet |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Don't be ridiculous, all you're doing with a large membership fee is excluding genuine people who won't or can't afford it and opening it up to dickheads with a budget. If it's all about your wallet then hire someone and be done. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
