FabSwingers.com > Forums > Fabswingers.com site feedback > Verification after 6 weeks
Verification after 6 weeks
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?
Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
Harsh....for single men more so as they sometimes struggle to get meets early on. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
In anyway -
So webcam, photo etc.
Just so you get a feel for who is "real" |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ilandlarryCouple
over a year ago
more north lincs than mids! |
"In anyway -
So webcam, photo etc.
Just so you get a feel for who is "real""
some people don't like the idea of being photo verified. Each to their own.
Some people don't use the chat room so can't/won't get cam verified.
Harsh in my opinion. If you see someone who has been on longer than you think is acceptable without verifications then just pass them by |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
Most people don't take any notice of webcam veri's anyway.
I personally think that people should be left to use their profile how they wish.
Calling people trash for not using the site the same way as you think they should is a bit much I think. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
No disrespect intended for the word "trash" wrong choice of adjective.
I agree with your points, you can always pass them. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
http://www.fabswingers.com/my/filters
This might be the right time to mentione mail filters 
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
without the e on mention.  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
point taken |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *andcCouple
over a year ago
London and Cheshire |
We just pass the by
We would like to see people who have not logged in for say 3 months not to show in search results.. cannot see the point in showing them.
Also if someone has been away for a while like servicemen (and women) going to afgan etc.. soon as they return and log in they would show up again. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
Those who havn't logged on for a hile will fall don to the bottom of the list, so I suppose we can scroll as far as we want |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Think that would be harsh, if a persons a site supporter then should it matter? I'm looking for an local fb, it could take days or mths till the right lady came along , the filters can single out the folk you don't want surely that should be enough ... |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *xodussxMan
over a year ago
sheffield |
Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Fabswingers covers many different sexual areas , its a great site it just wouldn't be right to start excluding folk who don't meet a certain pre-fixed profile off how different people wanna use the site. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"ok who nicked my W's"
I hear you like your W's.... Willies that is...  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Probably a bit harsh!im a fusspot and have only had one meet this time round so far.Plus i work shifts so meets have to be arranged around them.I think alot of us genuine folk on here are in the same position. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *andcCouple
over a year ago
London and Cheshire |
"Think that would be harsh, if a persons a site supporter then should it matter? I'm looking for an local fb, it could take days or mths till the right lady came along , the filters can single out the folk you don't want surely that should be enough ..."
Whats being a site supporter got to do with verificaction? Just because you pay a few quid doesn't make you more genuine. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
"ok who nicked my W's
I hear you like your W's.... Willies that is... "
You heard right  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *alcmarCouple
over a year ago
Malaga, Spain now ex High Barnet |
"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?
Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?
"
I pretty much agree with the aim - but think six weeks is a bit short. Personally we don't really look at anyone who has been on longer than six months and hasn't been verified by meeting (we feel they are either phonies, so up themselves they wouldn't be interested in meeting us, or simply one of the many who talk about meeting rather than actually meeting). We're also doubtful about those couples or ladies who only have a verification from one bloke - and those who don't show their verifications.
But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
"But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact."
that is the crux of it.. gut feel - if you are not confident then just move on to the next profile - dont waste your own time |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
[Removed by poster at 31/08/12 01:47:08] |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?
Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?
"
bloody hell hes only been here 4 weeks and hes trying to get people booted off already, he'll be ruling the world after a year  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Harsh....for single men more so as they sometimes struggle to get meets early on."
Took me about the same as I've 2 jobs and meeting takes planning plus was nervous  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"In anyway -
So webcam, photo etc.
Just so you get a feel for who is "real""
Not everyone has a webcam and just because some has been picture verified, doesn't prove they are genuine |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?
Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?
I pretty much agree with the aim - but think six weeks is a bit short. Personally we don't really look at anyone who has been on longer than six months and hasn't been verified by meeting (we feel they are either phonies, so up themselves they wouldn't be interested in meeting us, or simply one of the many who talk about meeting rather than actually meeting). We're also doubtful about those couples or ladies who only have a verification from one bloke - and those who don't show their verifications.
But it is pretty much gut feel isn't it? If you don't feel comfortable with the messages you are getting from someone or if they aren't willing to provide a mobile number to verify there is a female member of the "couple" then politely apologise for wasting their time and break the contact."
Some people hide their verifications because they have perhaps been stalked, had someone go through their verifications slagging them off to the author or slagged the off because of either who they have played with or because they have a long verification list. So not all phonies or fakes or trash as the op says  |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Who are we to suggest that if no verifications after 6weeks people should be removed???? Will you pay back their membership? And someone may join the site just for fun and talk in the forum and never plan to meet
"
Don't forget those who only meet at clubs and use this site to keep in touch with those who they have met |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ikkiBWoman
over a year ago
Falkirk |
Its an idea but one that would be hard to enforce. I met a guy who had been on for 7 months with no veri due to the fact he hadn't been on due to being in a relationship, so going by this he would be booted for it.
Just think you need to understand people may have reasons for not meeting in 6 weeks/months and it doesn't mean they are automatically fake or timewasting.
I haven't met anyone for a wee while, well no one new and I've been happy browsing forums and going on chat. Everyones on here for diff reasons so just gotta put up with any fakes out there
And a wee extra, I once came across someone with about 20 verifications on their profile and they were a sick abusive twit so even the veri system isn't fool proof and if you give a time limit to get veri there would be a lot more fake verying going on |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Its an idea but one that would be hard to enforce. I met a guy who had been on for 7 months with no veri due to the fact he hadn't been on due to being in a relationship, so going by this he would be booted for it.
Just think you need to understand people may have reasons for not meeting in 6 weeks/months and it doesn't mean they are automatically fake or timewasting.
I haven't met anyone for a wee while, well no one new and I've been happy browsing forums and going on chat. Everyones on here for diff reasons so just gotta put up with any fakes out there
And a wee extra, I once came across someone with about 20 verifications on their profile and they were a sick abusive twit so even the veri system isn't fool proof and if you give a time limit to get veri there would be a lot more fake verying going on"
nah its a daft idea really, see if you like to see people verified within 6 weeks to show they not time wasters or they get kicked off the site then you arnt going to see anymore who has been on for longer than 6 weeks with no verification
people will just either beg for fake verifications so they dont get banned, and people will probally help them out and do it for them - or they will simply make new accounts
at the moment the systems perfect for you coz you can put a filter on unverified people messaging, but you can also see how long someone has been on the site for and if they have been verified, if they havent you can make your own judgement
but adding this feature will take away the facility to make that judgement |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Most people don't take any notice of webcam veri's anyway.
I personally think that people should be left to use their profile how they wish.
Calling people trash for not using the site the same way as you think they should is a bit much I think."
 |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I spend months at sea so we would have been kicked off if we didnt get a verification before I left. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm genuine, but not verified...been on a while longer now.....chatted to a few folk but not met yet....so still looking anyone interested get back for a chat . Seems its just not as easy as some people think to get a real meet... . |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does anybody agree that there should be rule regarding verifications? For example you have been on the site 6 weeks and you haven't been verified in anyway since joining then you should be removed?
Harsh or cutting the "trash" out?
"
Harsh and totally unnecessary because of all the reasons quoted above
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Let us just except this site for what it is |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm genuine, but not verified...been on a while longer now.....chatted to a few folk but not met yet....so still looking anyone interested get back for a chat . Seems its just not as easy as some people think to get a real meet...."
But your profile says verified genuine profile? |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
right as a single guy , struggles to get meet if not verified, let me put this to you , as a single guy not verified , meet a new women on here also not verified , hoew do we verify our meet ......... simply not fair !!!!
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
|
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
|
By *ugby 123Couple
over a year ago
Forum Mod O o O oo |
As this has now gone from a perfectly good feedback question to questioning the mans grammar then maybe time to shut it....especially as the man saw many peoples points way up the thread. |
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) | |
