 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
So this probably seems rather niche but it's strange fabs doesn't allow for trans or poly couples? This probably make sense 10 years ago but it's a little old fashioned now and would be good for couples who can declare they are trans or list a poly/thruple couple. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"go on a TV & TS site keep this site for swingers"
You don't need to be so scared. Nobody's forcing you to interact with anyone on a site you don't want to. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Probably just jealous that they don’t look as good in knickers.
Hijacking the thread every so slightly-a lot.
It’s also about time TS isnt used/is a option, and FtM, MtF is an option instead. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options... "
I mean, possibly, but there's definitely extras where the search is too limited. If there were options to search for certain body types (seeing as we have to input that field in on the profile anyway), don't think that be a bad edition for example?
Obviously if the choice was too granular then it wouldn't work. But I doubt we'll see anything like that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don't disagree with ops comment but I reckon admins have to be careful about introducing too much granularity in how people define themselves. Because that increases how many search criteria you have. We'll all end up in our own little silos if we get to the point where you can choose too many options... "
And that.. would be beautiful |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
