Which has nothing to do with Mods, they just approve or reject a pic they don't pick n choose who goes on the top fabbed list.
That is down to the amount of fabs a pic receives a certain amount of time, 12 hours, this month or the year. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It could be for many reasons but personally I am not interested in couples so I don't fab their pictures, I only fab what I like or am interested in.
Sorry if my comment is a useless answer to you but just dropping my 2 pence worth. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Lol 470 fabs in 3 hours =no 2 spot
Just had a quick look at the Top Photos and the current No 2. picture has 2,384 fabs - which seems about right.over 12 hours yes "
But that is the measure by which the Top Photos works.
It's not a matter of the rate at which a pic is getting fabs, it's how many in a 12 hour period.
2,384 is a lot higher than 470 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"How is it the mods fault you only got 400 n odd fabs??"
I think the inference was that somehow the mods had kept them from their rightful position in the list rather than limiting fabs |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How is it the mods fault you only got 400 n odd fabs??
I think the inference was that somehow the mods had kept them from their rightful position in the list rather than limiting fabs "
Ohhh . Who has the time to complain about silly stuff .. the mind boggles |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eeleyWoman
over a year ago
Dudley |
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol"
Eh? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol
Eh?"
It's not uncommon to see a status update lamenting that their site supporter is running out and would anyone like to pay for a new one |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Methinks someone is trying to get someone to pay for their subscription again, lol. Did it last month I underand has done in the past,oh shame they aren't getting enough fabs to encourage..lol"
Who has? The op? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic