See so many so called couple profiles where generally just guy active, looks at verifications & no activety for years so assume couple have split & male still using profile. Would be a good idea if people had to update pic verification every year to out fakes? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ucka39Man
over a year ago
Newcastle |
"See so many so called couple profiles where generally just guy active, looks at verifications & no activety for years so assume couple have split & male still using profile. Would be a good idea if people had to update pic verification every year to out fakes? "
Good idea but some relationships are lucky to last a year so everything 6 months could be a better option |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Or why not just ask to see them both or the female on cam briefly? There's no need to show faces and you can simply block those who refuse. "
I do that & have a long block list of time wasters, but would be better for all genuine members if the site asked for regular phote verifications to out fakes? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Photo verification hasn't been done for many that have been on here for years, what happens to those people that still don't want to do it?
What happens to the people that don't want to / won't reverify every 6 months?
What happens when someone takes a site break of more than 6 months?
The human hours required to re- photo verify the site, twice a year will be enormous.
I've never really used the photo verification option in my vetting process and I don't have issues with 'fakes'
I simply don't think it would achieve what you want it to achieve. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"See so many so called couple profiles where generally just guy active, looks at verifications & no activety for years so assume couple have split & male still using profile. Would be a good idea if people had to update pic verification every year to out fakes?
Good idea but some relationships are lucky to last a year so everything 6 months could be a better option"
Whilst they are at it, do you think Admin could also pop around to every single guys house every 6 months just to prove they are single? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Or why not just ask to see them both or the female on cam briefly? There's no need to show faces and you can simply block those who refuse.
I do that & have a long block list of time wasters, but would be better for all genuine members if the site asked for regular phote verifications to out fakes? "
No amount of photos is going to out fakes because the fakes come in various forms. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We’ve been on here for years but not photo verified !
Being a m/f couple a phone call prior always gives peace of mind all ways "
I always speak to both people in a couple before we meet. That's a good way of sorting out the timewasters. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"See so many so called couple profiles where generally just guy active, looks at verifications & no activety for years so assume couple have split & male still using profile. Would be a good idea if people had to update pic verification every year to out fakes? "
^^^^^^^ Totally Agree & such an excellent idea. I've come across a few too and pics are totally dated as in yrs old and photos are all of the Female and OMG the guys behind these profiles ain't so nice either |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Photo verification doesn't even prove anything.
We have noticed a significant rise in fake profiles with pictures stolen from the internet, but they have passed photo verification.
Some have had their verification photo in the photo gallery and they have obviously been photoshopped. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic