Why is it that the cam images on Fab are soooo small? Even "large" should really be tagged "less tiny".
Is it a problem with bandwidth or what? The other swingers site we use has a much better chat interface and significantly larger cam images with greater clarity and smoother play. Hence Soph makes her cam appearances there rather than here.
Much as we like the rest of the site's facilities, the chat interface and cam sizes really let it down. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why is it that the cam images on Fab are soooo small? Even "large" should really be tagged "less tiny".
Is it a problem with bandwidth or what? The other swingers site we use has a much better chat interface and significantly larger cam images with greater clarity and smoother play. Hence Soph makes her cam appearances there rather than here.
Much as we like the rest of the site's facilities, the chat interface and cam sizes really let it down. " ![](/icons/thumb_up.png) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
![](https://fabs-as.fabswingers.com/images/default.jpg) |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why is it that the cam images on Fab are soooo small? Even "large" should really be tagged "less tiny".
Is it a problem with bandwidth or what? The other swingers site we use has a much better chat interface and significantly larger cam images with greater clarity and smoother play. Hence Soph makes her cam appearances there rather than here.
Much as we like the rest of the site's facilities, the chat interface and cam sizes really let it down. "
This ![](/icons/thumb_up.png) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Nothing has changed much about Fab in years. It really is a bit outdated and in need of an overhaul, especially the chat rooms which have issues with current browsers. It often reminds me of chat rooms from 15 years ago or more.
If I had to guess, I'd just say it;s down to the site owners not being willing to update their servers, server hosting OR pay for someone to overhaul it for them.
I certainly don't recall any site feedback being acted upon over the last few years either come to think of it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why is it that the cam images on Fab are soooo small? Even "large" should really be tagged "less tiny".
Is it a problem with bandwidth or what? The other swingers site we use has a much better chat interface and significantly larger cam images with greater clarity and smoother play. Hence Soph makes her cam appearances there rather than here.
Much as we like the rest of the site's facilities, the chat interface and cam sizes really let it down. "
Our eyesight is being strained squinting at the tiny cams ![](/icons/s/sad.gif) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Why is it that the cam images on Fab are soooo small? Even "large" should really be tagged "less tiny".
Is it a problem with bandwidth or what? The other swingers site we use has a much better chat interface and significantly larger cam images with greater clarity and smoother play. Hence Soph makes her cam appearances there rather than here.
Much as we like the rest of the site's facilities, the chat interface and cam sizes really let it down. " ![](/icons/thumb_up.png) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"You get what you pay for i suspect, £5 for 50 days is nothing really. To update servers and software cost money. "
Its nothing for one person, but I think you underestimate the amount of people do actually pay for Gold or Silver membership and have been for many years and this will only increase with new members etc.
Its quite easy to look up a companies accounts and find out how much money they do make and how much cash they actually have ![](/icons/s/biggrin.gif) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic