 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
You've got to love the attitude of the quacks who write this stuff (and believe their own bullshit).
From everydayfeminism.com
"Because while fairness is a valuable goal, equality for equality’s sake isn’t nearly as important as justice – for liberation’s sake"
Can anybody translate that into something comprehensible?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
The tone of equality is not enough and "justice" is required worries me.
But thankfully they are ineffectual idiots that all but the most gullible see through. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's the word "feminism" that seems to rub some men up the wrong way. (Believe me I know how to rub the right way) 
As posted above, they're all either ugly, lesbian, liberal, middle class, boilersuit wearing, cropped haired nazis.
Or just maybe, they're attractive, straight, left wing, working class, dress wearing, short haired humanists. Yes, I would say I'm a feminist in that I believe in equality for women. I am not a man hater.
As women, we need to redefine the word so it is no longer associated with the imagery that some men still hold to be true.
Then again, I've discovered a few misogynists on this site so maybe we're fighting a losing battle. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
And of course cut out the thinly veiled misandry in parts of feminism.
An undefined amorphous blob of some reasonable ideals mixed with a fair helping of very unreasonable ideals.
I don't care how people dress or cut their hair, only what they stand for.
Why not scrap the lot and just be egalitarian? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
